Fuel Economy Rating Unchanged in February

Photo of Paul Ausick
By Paul Ausick Updated Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
Fuel Economy Rating Unchanged in February

© Thinkstock

The average fuel-economy rating for new vehicles sold in the United States in February 2016 was 25.2 miles per gallon (mpg), flat with January’s average. For all of 2015, the average fuel-economy rating for new vehicles sold was 25.3 mpg, down from 25.4 mpg in 2014.

Compared with October 2007, fuel economy ratings on new cars sold has improved by 5 mpg, or more than 24%.

While the window sticker average is 5 mpg higher than when the data were first collected, the average is still 0.7 mpg below its all-time high of 25.8 mpg set in August 2014. When gasoline prices started dropping in the United States, consumers purchased more light trucks, sport utility vehicles (SUVs) and crossovers, which get lower mpg ratings and drive down the average.

The data are based on the average sales-weighted fuel-economy rating printed on a new car’s window sticker and is compiled by Michael Sivak and Brandon Schoettle of the University of Michigan’s Transportation Research Institute.
[nativounit]
The sales-weighted unadjusted Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) performance rating averaged 31.3 miles per gallon in January, up 0.3 mpg month over month and a 6.6 mpg improvement since October 2007. These values are not directly comparable to the window-sticker ratings because these are adjusted by the EPA and used to derive the window-sticker ratings.

Auto sales in the month of February rose 6.8% to a seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) of 17.53 million vehicles, compared with a SAAR of 16.39 million in February 2015. The past month was the best February for new vehicle sales since 2000. Ford sales jumped 20% last month, with SUV and pickup truck sales leading the way.

Americans continue to buy less fuel-efficient SUVs and pickups, and barring some gargantuan event, pump prices are not expected to rise much, if at all, this year.

Photo of Paul Ausick
About the Author Paul Ausick →

Paul Ausick has been writing for a673b.bigscoots-temp.com for more than a decade. He has written extensively on investing in the energy, defense, and technology sectors. In a previous life, he wrote technical documentation and managed a marketing communications group in Silicon Valley.

He has a bachelor's degree in English from the University of Chicago and now lives in Montana, where he fishes for trout in the summer and stays inside during the winter.

Featured Reads

Our top personal finance-related articles today. Your wallet will thank you later.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

WAT Vol: 2,131,048
INTC Vol: 198,362,091
AKAM Vol: 8,677,900
MU Vol: 64,268,462
QCOM Vol: 34,272,223

Top Losing Stocks

HII Vol: 1,746,810
POOL Vol: 2,311,870
APTV Vol: 10,166,405
LDOS Vol: 2,252,442
PYPL Vol: 39,099,369