Calls Begin for End to U.S. Ban on Crude Oil Exports

Photo of Paul Ausick
By Paul Ausick Updated Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

Oil Tanker
Thinkstock
It was only a matter of time. In the wake of the 1973 OPEC oil embargo, the U.S. enacted a law in 1975 that prohibits (with minor exceptions) exporting U.S. crude oil. But as U.S. crude production continues to rise, the inevitable calls for lifting that ban will begin.

The first shot was fired by an editorial in the Financial Times:

In effect, the ban is principally a subsidy to the US refining industry. But it is of little benefit to consumers and threatens to harm North American oil production. It also undermines US credibility with its trading partners. It is long past time that the US embargo was lifted, too.

That the export ban is a boon to refiners is inarguable, but that is only a recent phenomena. We have noted before that refiners stand to dictate the price they will pay for domestic crude so that they can make a profit on exports of refined products like gasoline and, principally, diesel fuel. Gulf Coast refiners like Valero Corp. (NYSE: VLO) and Marathon Petroleum Corp. (NYSE: MPC) and East Coast refiners like PBF Energy Inc. (NYSE: PBF) now have the ability to move crude to their refineries by rail. Even though that costs much more than pipeline transportation, by hard bargaining over the price of crude the refiners can make a tidy profit of around $6 to $7 a barrel. Phillips 66 (NYSE: PSX), with one refinery on the East Coast and three on the Gulf Coast, also stands to prosper.

The Financial Times notes that U.S. consumers “would see no benefit [from a continued ban on crude exports], because oil product exports are unrestricted, allowing refiners to receive world prices for their sales.” That conclusion assumes that refiners will export more gasoline and diesel fuel at higher world prices that will be unaffected by the new product on the market. More refined product on the global market should lower prices for all. Besides, if U.S. refiners get too greedy, they likely would face regulatory restrictions on exports of refined products.

Making the case for lifting the ban on exports means going against all the recent public attention given to U.S. energy security and energy independence. That will be a hard sell in the court of public opinion, but crude producers, including supermajors like Exxon Mobil Corp. (NYSE: XOM) and Chevron Corp. (NYSE: CVX), have deep pockets and a lot to gain from being able to export U.S. crude.

Photo of Paul Ausick
About the Author Paul Ausick →

Paul Ausick has been writing for a673b.bigscoots-temp.com for more than a decade. He has written extensively on investing in the energy, defense, and technology sectors. In a previous life, he wrote technical documentation and managed a marketing communications group in Silicon Valley.

He has a bachelor's degree in English from the University of Chicago and now lives in Montana, where he fishes for trout in the summer and stays inside during the winter.

Featured Reads

Our top personal finance-related articles today. Your wallet will thank you later.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618