A review of the fundamentals begs the issue of why each stock price isn’t down further. For instance, Chevron saw its revenue and net income decline year over year by 35% and 43%, respectively. Exxon Mobil fared slightly worse with revenue and net income declining 36% and 46%, respectively.
Fundamentals are not the only driving force in the stocks, especially over the short term. At times, it is about beating lowered Wall Street expectations. Chevron’s 35% fall in revenue was $10 billion less than analysts expected. In addition, it earned $0.58 per share more than expected. The same could be said about Exxon Mobil. Its 36% decline in revenue was $14 billion greater than Wall Street’s low expectations. Exxon Mobil’s earnings per share also came in at $0.35 better than expected.
ALSO READ: Has the Growth of Dividends and Buybacks Peaked?
Analysts are not expecting a bright future for these two companies either. The Wall Street consensus has Chevron’s earnings pegged at $4.03 per share for 2015. At its current price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 11, this works out to $44.33 per share, representing a 57% decline from its current level of $103.08, as of this writing. Analysts collectively predict full-year earnings of $4.26 per share for Exxon Mobil. At its current P/E ratio of 13, this works out to $55.38 per share, representing a 35% decline from its current stock price of $85.08.
However, the market could tolerate a higher P/E ratio for these companies, assuming that hope for a turnaround remains. If that sentiment disappears due to worse than expected fundamentals, the downside for these two companies could be much worse.
Author William Bias holds shares in Exxon.
Top Gaining Stocks
Top Losing Stocks