Reviewing a Million Foreclosures

Reuters reports that the San Francisco problem is really an example of a national one. “The audit in San Francisco is the most detailed and comprehensive that has been done — but it’s likely those numbers are comparable nationally,” Diane Thompson, an attorney at the National Consumer Law Center, told the news service. The problems of robosigning and faulty documentation will need to be examined again despite the huge bank settlement terms. The San Francisco data shows that.

There were 1.4 million homes in the foreclosed residential house pool at the end of last year, according to research firm Corelogic. Many experts put the number higher than that because of shadow inventory, which are homes held by banks that have been foreclosed on but are not yet up for sale. The effects of foreclosures go well beyond how these homes might be sold. A foreclosed home affects the value of homes around it because that home is likely to be sold below market. Many of the foreclosed homes receive no upkeep. Federal officials such as Ben Bernanke want to see renters in these homes, but the logistics of that process would be a nightmare.

The number of foreclosures is into the seven figures since the housing crisis began, and there is no systematic way to tell which of them were done properly. That means abuses would need to be discovered by a review of all of them. That would take months, if not years, even if federal officials and banks worked hand in hand. Congress and the administration are unlikely to provide funds for such a large undertaking, which means it will not happen. Tens of thousand of people who were foreclosed on unfairly or illegally will never have any recourse because there in no way to uncover the abuse case by case.

Douglas A. McIntyre