KB Home Does Not Even Clear Low Earnings Bar

Photo of Paul Ausick
By Paul Ausick Updated Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

Housing Patterns
Thinkstock
KB Home (NYSE: KBH) reported third-quarter 2014 before markets opened Wednesday. The homebuilder reported diluted earnings per share (EPS) of $0.28 on revenues of $589.2 million. In the same period a year ago, KB Home reported an EPS loss of $0.30 on revenue of $549.0 million. Second-quarter results also compare to the Thomson Reuters consensus estimates for EPS of $0.40 and $646.76 million in revenue.

The company offered no guidance, but the consensus estimates for the fourth quarter call for EPS of $0.53 on revenues of $744.29 million. For the full year, the EPS estimate is $1.30 on revenues of $2.41 billion.

KB Home said that it delivered 1,793 homes in the second quarter, down from 1,825 delivered in the same period a year ago. The average selling price increased by $27,900 to $327,000. The increase was largest in the company’s West Coast region.

The company’s CEO said:

In a slowly recovering economic and housing market environment, we are consistently producing profitable results, growing our community count and generating our highest backlog value since 2008. … During the third quarter, there was an appreciable uptick in our traffic levels which we see as evidence of the pent-up demand for new housing and strong interest in our product offerings. We believe demand will continue to strengthen as consumer confidence, household incomes and mortgage availability improve, creating even greater opportunities to achieve continued success in our served markets.

Gross profit margins came in an 18.8%, up from 18.2% in the year-ago quarter. Gross margin slipped from 18.9% sequentially. Housing backlog is up 37% on a dollar basis going into the fourth quarter of 2014 and up 13% on a number of homes basis.

KB Home posted higher revenue, a sequential improvement in SG&A costs, and higher selling prices. But costs and expenses rose more than 8% from $510 million to $552 million, and that chopped operating income by slightly more than $2 million. Net income was up about $1 million year-over-year, but EPS was lower likely due to an increase of about 8 million in shares outstanding.

Whatever caused the bad miss on both EPS and revenues consensus estimates is a little difficult to pin down, but investors are not waiting for any explanations. Shares were down about 7% in premarket trading and still down more than 6% shortly after the bell, at $15.90 in a 52-week range of $15.40 to $20.78. Thomson Reuters had a consensus analyst price target of around $20.20 before the results were announced.

ALSO READ: The 10 Most Affordable Housing Markets in America

[protected-iframe id=”7480533d6474a356c476bd23e7878114-5450697-30366712″ info=”//companies.findthebest.com/w/cc8E7qHUUwl” width=”600″ height=”400″ frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no”]
Photo of Paul Ausick
About the Author Paul Ausick →

Paul Ausick has been writing for a673b.bigscoots-temp.com for more than a decade. He has written extensively on investing in the energy, defense, and technology sectors. In a previous life, he wrote technical documentation and managed a marketing communications group in Silicon Valley.

He has a bachelor's degree in English from the University of Chicago and now lives in Montana, where he fishes for trout in the summer and stays inside during the winter.

Featured Reads

Our top personal finance-related articles today. Your wallet will thank you later.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618