PG&E Cuts Off Power, Costs California Economy $2.6 Billion

Photo of Paul Ausick
By Paul Ausick Updated Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
PG&E Cuts Off Power, Costs California Economy $2.6 Billion

© michellegibson / Getty Images

All those years of insufficient maintenance caught up with PG&E Corp. (NYSE: PCG | PCG Price Prediction) in 2017 and 2018 when wildfires raged through Northern California destroying thousands of homes and causing at least 100 deaths. In order to avoid a repeat of past disasters, the company cut off power to 513,000 customers early Wednesday morning in response to forecasts for widespread areas of high winds.

Power will be shut off to another 234,000 customers at around noon PT on Wednesday with a potential for 42,000 more to lose power later. The company said they expected the winds to last through midday Thursday, although the risk in some areas remains “elevated” into Friday.

In cities affected by the power shutdown, officials have warned residents to be prepared for six powerless days.

A two-day blackout could post a loss of $2.6 billion for the affected area, and PG&E likely will be off the hook for those costs.

But avoiding another disaster is local and state governments’ primary goal. Governor Gavin Newsom on Tuesday acknowledged the disruption the power shutdown will cause at the same time that he offered a bit of praise for PG&E for finally “[waking] up to their responsibility to keep people safe.”

[nativounit]

State Senator Jerry Hill, a long-time critic of the company, told a local television station it’s easy for PG&E to turn off the power: “There’s no liability if there’s a fire after that, rather than providing that safe system that they haven’t and that they’ve been paid to do.”

“We are not a third-world country,” Hill said.

Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf said that PG&E should have been doing more, presumably over a long period, to maintain its power distribution system and avoid a shutdown of this size. She did say, however, that “in the interest of public safety,” the shutdown can’t be avoided.

Hill called the shutdown an overreaction, according to a report at Bloomberg News: “I think they need to spend the billions they’ve already received to harden the system. I think they’re in crisis and will do anything to prevent another wildfire.”

He appears to have a point. Investors seem to agree that the company’s bankruptcy won’t be adversely affected by the shutdown. After all, if there is no power running through the lines and a fire starts, how can it be PG&E’s fault?

PG&E stock traded up more than two points earlier Wednesday and was trading up about 1.3% at $11.05 just after the noon hour. The stock’s 52-week range is $5.07 to $49.42, and the consensus 12-month price target is $16.77.

[recirclink id=583510]
[wallst_email_signup]

Photo of Paul Ausick
About the Author Paul Ausick →

Paul Ausick has been writing for a673b.bigscoots-temp.com for more than a decade. He has written extensively on investing in the energy, defense, and technology sectors. In a previous life, he wrote technical documentation and managed a marketing communications group in Silicon Valley.

He has a bachelor's degree in English from the University of Chicago and now lives in Montana, where he fishes for trout in the summer and stays inside during the winter.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618