IonQ Tripled Revenue but Its Stock Is Down 22%

Photo of David Beren
By David Beren Published

Quick Read

  • IonQ (IONQ) is down 22.3% despite Q4 revenue of $61.9M (up 428%), 2025 revenue of $130M, and 2026 guidance of $225-245M; EBITDA loss expected at -$310M to -$330M, P/S of 101, SkyWater acquisition pending.

  • IonQ became the first public quantum company to exceed $100M in annual revenue, but 2026 losses are widening to -$310M even as revenue scales, creating a disconnect between business performance and stock price.

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
IonQ Tripled Revenue but Its Stock Is Down 22%

© HelloRF Zcool / Shutterstock.com

Providing full-stack infrastructure for the artificial intelligence industry, IonQ (NYSE:IONQ | IONQ Price Prediction) has delivered revenue growth that almost no one predicted at this pace, yet the stock sits 21% below where it started 2026, and that gap between business performance and price is what retail investors are debating right now.

Ultimately, the Q4 2025 numbers are hard to dismiss as quarterly revenue hit $61.9 million, a 429% year-over-year jump that beat consensus estimates by 53.7%. Full-year 2025 revenue reached $130 million, tripling 2024 and making IonQ the first public quantum company to exceed $100 million in annual GAAP revenue. Management is guiding for $225 million to $245 million in 2026 revenue, with CEO Niccolo de Masi calling it a “strategic and financial inflection point.”

The problem is what sits on the other side of that growth. The 2026 Adjusted EBITDA loss is expected to widen to between -$310 million and -$330 million. Operating cash flow in 2025 was -$283 million. The stock trades at a price-to-sales ratio of around 100-120, a valuation that prices in breakthroughs still years away.

Reddit Is Split, and the Data Shows It

Social sentiment on IonQ has whipsawed over the past two weeks. A post on r/wallstreetbets on February 25 drove sentiment to 84 (Very Bullish) after a user flagged IonQ’s inclusion in a $151 billion missile contract. That spike faded fast. By March 8-9, sentiment in r/stocks had fallen back to 22-28 (Bearish), with comment-to-upvote ratios suggesting genuine debate rather than consensus.

An infographic titled
24/7 Wall St.
This infographic provides a detailed look at IONQ’s financial performance, including Q4 and FY 2025 revenue and 2026 guidance, alongside an analysis of its social sentiment score and its drivers on March 9, 2026.
IONQ SECURES PLACE IN MISSLE CONTACT
by u/therealJcrusin in wallstreetbets

 

The post’s author, u/therealJcrusin, wrote: “Unfortunately, most people don’t understand Quantum and that makes the company an easy target for short sellers… I believe there is a TON of upside to investing now and way, way more in the long term (5 to 10 years).”

The bearish case in r/stocks centers on three concerns:

  • Losses are accelerating, not shrinking: the 2026 EBITDA loss guidance of -$310M to -$330M is wider than the -$186.75M posted in 2025
  • The 2026 EBITDA loss guidance of -$310M to -$330M is wider than the -$186.75M posted in 2025, meaning losses are expanding even as revenue scales.
  • Per prior coverage, Wolfpack Research has alleged revenue quality concerns tied to government contract dependency, a claim IonQ disputes
 

The Backlog Is Real, but the Burn Rate Is the Test

As of the end of 2025, remaining performance obligations stood at $370 million, nearly five times the $77 million figure at the end of 2024, and that backlog is not speculative. The QuantumBasel contract alone exceeds $60 million over four years, and IonQ holds $3.3 billion in cash and investments to fund the roadmap. Analysts carry a consensus price target of $74 with 7 Buy ratings and zero Sells.

The pending SkyWater Technology acquisition, expected to close in Q2 or Q3 2026, is the clearest near-term test of IonQ’s execution credibility. A clean close would strengthen its position with government buyers who increasingly require domestic manufacturing capability. A stumble would expose how little room the current valuation leaves for operational setbacks.

Photo of David Beren
About the Author David Beren →

David Beren has been a Flywheel Publishing contributor since 2022. Writing for 24/7 Wall St. since 2023, David loves to write about topics of all shapes and sizes. As a technology expert, David focuses heavily on consumer electronics brands, automobiles, and general technology. He has previously written for LifeWire, formerly About.com. As a part-time freelance writer, David’s “day job” has been working on and leading social media for multiple Fortune 100 brands. David loves the flexibility of this field and its ability to reach customers exactly where they like to spend their time. Additionally, David previously published his own blog, TmoNews.com, which reached 3 million readers in its first year. In addition to freelance and social media work, David loves to spend time with his family and children and relive the glory days of video game consoles by playing any retro game console he can get his hands on.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618