The Eurovision Song Contest and Apple

Photo of Paul Ausick
By Paul Ausick Updated Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

ABBA
Sue Katz
Though barely a blip on the U.S. radar, the Eurovision song contest is among the most-watched TV programs in the world. More than 170 million viewers worldwide watched the 2013 contest and even more probably tuned in Saturday night to watch the bearded lady, Conchita Wurst of Austria, run off with the title. The winner is chosen by jury and viewer voting.

Wurst, a 25 year-old singer whose real name is Thomas Neuwirth, sported a tight shimmering dress, long hair, and a beard to win the contest. The best known of former winners are the Swedish supergroup ABBA which took the prize in 1974 and Celine Dion, the 1988 winner. Things have obviously changed a little in the 58 years of Eurovision history.

Thinking about Eurovision and music calls to mind again last week’s reports that Apple Inc. (NASDAQ: AAPL) is reportedly set to acquire headphones and streaming music company Beats Electronics for $3.2 billion. Apple revived the music business in the first years of the new century with its iPod players.

Relatively inexpensive music sold by the song and available anywhere the customer could carry the player revolutionized the way people listen to and buy music. The music industry had focused on selling CDs with several tunes at prices approaching $20 compared with the $0.99 price of most songs from iTunes. And most fans don’t want to pay for a dozen songs they don’t care about to get the one they want to listen to.

Now streaming music that is available for rent is replacing purchases of single tracks as well as CDs and Apple and the music industry were both late to the party. In order to jump to the top of the heap — which is the only place that Apple can afford to be — the company has to do something big and daring and paying a fortune to Dr. Dre and music industry mogul Jimmy Iovine will certainly make everyone notice that Apple is now in the streaming business for real.

The deal, if it happens, is not about headphones and maybe not even about streaming. It’s largely about Iovine, a 61 year-old music industry veteran who has engineered and produced artists like Bruce Springsteen and Patti Smith, and founded and ran a successful record company. He’s a proven quantity in the industry, and, if if he joins Apple and can drive the adoption of streaming even further than it has already gone, he will be worth every penny Apple pays.

But it’s a very big if. The Beats streaming music player has generated little enthusiasm, and the competitor Apple is aiming at — Spotify — has 24 million users in 56 countries. More than 6 million of those users are paying subscribers. Apple starts in a big hole, and even a music industry big shot like Iovine may not be able to pull the company out.

ALSO READ: $3.2 Billion for Beats — Is Apple Crazy?

Photo of Paul Ausick
About the Author Paul Ausick →

Paul Ausick has been writing for a673b.bigscoots-temp.com for more than a decade. He has written extensively on investing in the energy, defense, and technology sectors. In a previous life, he wrote technical documentation and managed a marketing communications group in Silicon Valley.

He has a bachelor's degree in English from the University of Chicago and now lives in Montana, where he fishes for trout in the summer and stays inside during the winter.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618