Military

Could Boeing's Move Into Spare Parts Business Backfire?

courtesy of the Boeing Co.

As new orders for commercial jets have slowed down in the past year and look to be slower still this year, the two largest manufacturers of passenger jets have been forced to compete on pricing in order to win new business. One effect of that competition has been a squeeze on supplier pricing, and now that squeeze is getting even a little tighter.

The Wall Street Journal reported Monday that Boeing Co. (NYSE: BA) is trying to shoulder its way into the spare parts business that has traditionally been left to suppliers like Spirit AeroSystems and TransDigm, among many others. About 65% of the cost of building a new plane is paid out to suppliers. That can’t be helped, but Boeing now wants a piece of the very lucrative spare parts business.

How lucrative? Jet engine maker Rolls-Royce may be the gold standard in after-market parts and maintenance. The company’s civil aerospace division earned 53% of its 2015 revenues from services. The company long ago initiated a so-called power-by-the-hour maintenance contract for airlines that used RR engines on their Boeing or Airbus airframes. Essentially the contracts set a fixed sum per flying hour to pay for engine repair and parts replacement. The airlines would rather perform their own maintenance and purchase their own parts, but have virtually no choice but to sign.

As the Wall Street Journal pointed out, in 2012 Boeing started charging its suppliers a royalty when suppliers sold replacement parts or upgrades to airlines, claiming the suppliers’ parts were created using Boeing’s intellectual property. The suppliers basically had to pay up, but that does not mean that the airlines are happy.


Last month the International Air Transport Association (IATA) filed a complaint on behalf of its member carriers with the European Commission’s Directorate General for Competition, the same group that is currently holding Google’s feet to the antitrust fire in Europe. The complaint alleges “abuses of dominant positions by manufacturers of aviation equipment.”

According to the IATA’s CEO Tony Tyler, the focus is on the future:

Our members want to be able to negotiate contract terms more effectively and with more options than the OEM community will entertain today. Our aim is to help re-balance the relationship so that airlines and OEMs can work together as true business partners in a normal commercial relationship.

A ruling is likely to take months if not much longer, and OEMs like Boeing, Airbus and Rolls-Royce won’t give up without a fight. But it’s no secret that the airlines would like to be able to shop around for parts and services.

For Boeing, firing up to 8,000 employees, squeezing suppliers on costs, and now trying to take on their suppliers’ spare parts business is all directed at boosting the company’s cash flow. When Boeing reports first-quarter results on Wednesday, and analysts are looking for $1.83 in earnings per share and $21.44 billion in revenue. Both are below the totals for the first quarter of last year and are in line with the downwardly revised guidance the company gave when it reported fourth-quarter results in January.

Boeing’s costs have to go down if Boeing has to compete with Airbus and Bombardier on price, and that includes costs on spare parts and service. Every little bit will help.

Want to Retire Early? Start Here (Sponsor)

Want retirement to come a few years earlier than you’d planned? Or are you ready to retire now, but want an extra set of eyes on your finances?

Now you can speak with up to 3 financial experts in your area for FREE. By simply clicking here you can begin to match with financial professionals who can help you build your plan to retire early. And the best part? The first conversation with them is free.

Click here to match with up to 3 financial pros who would be excited to help you make financial decisions.

Thank you for reading! Have some feedback for us?
Contact the 24/7 Wall St. editorial team.