This suit could have the same result of a similar 2004 charge that Tiffany leveled against eBay Inc. (NASDAQ: EBAY). In that case the court said it was Tiffany’s responsibility to figure out the source of the counterfeit jewelry, not eBay’s.
In this case, Costco removed the rings from its stores in December on a request from Tiffany, but Tifffany filed suit yesterday after the company said it learned that Costco had been selling the rings for “many years,” according to a report in The Wall Street Journal.
Counterfeiting of luxury goods is an issue most of us associate with emerging country economies, where the luxury brand confers a status simply on the basis of its logo, not on the quality of its goods. Whether or not Costco knew the source of the rings, the company probably should have been more suspicious of Tiffany-labelled jewelry that it could sell for half price. When something appears to be too good to be true, it usually is.
Want to Retire Early? Start Here (Sponsor)
Want retirement to come a few years earlier than you’d planned? Or are you ready to retire now, but want an extra set of eyes on your finances?
Now you can speak with up to 3 financial experts in your area for FREE. By simply clicking here you can begin to match with financial professionals who can help you build your plan to retire early. And the best part? The first conversation with them is free.
Click here to match with up to 3 financial pros who would be excited to help you make financial decisions.
Have questions about retirement or personal finance? Email us at [email protected]!
By emailing your questions to 24/7 Wall St., you agree to have them published anonymously on a673b.bigscoots-temp.com.
By submitting your story, you understand and agree that we may use your story, or versions of it, in all media and platforms, including via third parties.
Thank you for reading! Have some feedback for us?
Contact the 24/7 Wall St. editorial team.