Why Lululemon’s Downgrade May Be Premature

Photo of Trey Thoelcke
By Trey Thoelcke Updated Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
Why Lululemon’s Downgrade May Be Premature

© Thinkstock

When Susan Anderson at FBR downgraded Lululemon Athletica Inc. (NASDAQ: LULU) with a 12-month target of $42 from $55, she probably didn’t expect the market to meet her half way at $47.80 the same day. FBR’s worries are based on backed-up inventory and broad discounts for the holiday season. Lululemon is traditionally known for its high prices to a niche market, and wide discounts could eat into the company’s margins.

The market’s reaction was perhaps a bit exaggerated, as the inventory problem is not new. Lululemon has been dealing with unusually high inventories since the end of most recent quarter. Inventory at the end of the second quarter was 55% higher year over year to begin with, but that was due to being under-inventoried for the second quarter of 2014, in addition to port delays according to Chief Financial Officer Stuart Haselden. Lululemon’s supply chain has since normalized, but the company is still dealing with a combination of late product from the first half of 2015 arriving with on-time product from the second.

From a pure supply and demand perspective going back to Microeconomics 101, inflated inventories are a supply increase, which forces price down, assuming demand remains the same. So it is not surprising that Lululemon was spotted offering broader discounts than it is accustomed to during a time when it is suffering from an oversupply caused by external factors.

ALSO READ: 6 Analyst Stock Picks With Massive Upside Targets

From a numbers perspective then, the analysts at FBR are probably correct in saying that Lululemon’s margins will be impacted by higher and broader discounts on its yoga apparel. The real question is, are these expected lower margins a signal of decreasing demand for its sports clothing, or only a brief hiccup caused by increased supply due to port problems?

Put another way, had there been no disruptions in Lululemon’s supply chain resulting in the current overstock and the current level of discounting nevertheless observed, then it would be a sign for worry that demand is what’s falling here. But given the extenuating circumstances in this case, the market’s reaction to one analyst’s opinion seems knee-jerk.

The implication of this downgrade is that Lululemon’s customers might be starting to migrate to lower-priced alternatives entering the yoga market, like Under Armour Inc. (NYSE: UA) and Nike Inc. (NYSE: NKE). The problem with that assumption is that Lululemon caters to a market of intense and tight-knit (no pun intended) yoga consumers with high brand loyalty who would rather buy better at a higher price than shop around for a deal on a brand they aren’t used to. They won’t switch to other brands so easily. Lululemon’s reputation for high prices is nothing new, so there is no obvious reason why its customers should switch specifically now.

The verdict on Lululemon should be held until we see if margins return to normal, once all supply issues have been normalized.

ALSO READ: Jefferies Has 4 Blue Chip High-Dividend Franchise Picks to Buy Now

Photo of Trey Thoelcke
About the Author Trey Thoelcke →

Trey has been an editor and author at 24/7 Wall St. for more than a decade, where he has published thousands of articles analyzing corporate earnings, dividend stocks, short interest, insider buying, private equity, and market trends. His comprehensive coverage spans the full spectrum of financial markets, from blue-chip stalwarts to emerging growth companies.

Beyond 24/7 Wall St., Trey has created and edited financial content for Benzinga and AOL's BloggingStocks, contributing additional hundreds of articles to the investment community. He previously oversaw the 24/7 Climate Insights site, managing editorial operations and content strategy, and currently oversees and creates content for My Investing News.

Trey's editorial expertise extends across multiple publishing environments. He served as production editor at Dearborn Financial Publishing and development editor at Kaplan, where he helped shape financial education materials. Earlier in his career, he worked as a writer-producer at SVE. His freelance editing portfolio includes work for prestigious clients such as Sage Publications, Rand McNally, the Institute for Supply Management, the American Library Association, Eggplant Literary Productions, and Spiegel.

Outside of financial journalism, Trey writes fiction and has been an active member of the writing community for years, overseeing a long-running critique group and moderating workshop sessions at regional conventions. He lives with his family in an old house in the Midwest.

Featured Reads

Our top personal finance-related articles today. Your wallet will thank you later.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618