Special Report

The Most (and Least) Dangerous States for Older Drivers

Thinkstock

Americans 65 years of age and older are 21% more likely to be killed in a traffic accident than the population as a whole. While people of this age group account for 14.5% of the total population, they represent 17.5% of all traffic fatalities.

The difference between the likelihood of traffic fatalities among older Americans and the entire population varies between states. To determine where driving is the most dangerous for seniors, 24/7 Wall St. compared traffic fatality data for state residents 65 years and older to that of the state’s entire population. The states with the widest gaps in fatality rates between these age groups were considered the most dangerous states to drive for seniors.

The most dangerous state for older Americans is Rhode Island, where seniors are 2.2 times more likely to die in a traffic accident than the overall state population. By contrast, seniors in New Mexico are 38% less likely than the state’s total population to die in a traffic accident, the safest state for seniors in the nation.

Click here to see the most (and least) dangerous states for older drivers.

States with the highest overall rates of traffic fatalities — including drivers, passengers, cyclists, and pedestrians — are not necessarily the states that are the most dangerous for senior drivers. Instead, the most dangerous states for Americans 65 and older are states with the highest share of residents 85 and older.

Age-related vision and cognitive declines, which worsen with age, can impair driving capabilities. However, this is not the main contributor to seniors having a higher traffic fatality rate than younger individuals.

The main contributor is the susceptibility of seniors to injury and medical complications when involved in an accident. Drivers who are 80-84 year olds, for example, tend to be involved in the same number of accidents as 25-29 year olds. Yet, the 80-84 year old drivers are nearly three times as likely to die from those accidents.

Because the risk of dying from an accident increases as a senior ages, the share of 85 and older residents is one predictor of a state’s elderly car accident death rate. Rhode Island, for example, where elderly residents are more than twice as likely as the whole population to die in a car accident, is tied for the largest share of residents 85 and older in the nation. In Alaska, on the other hand, seniors are considerably less likely to die in a traffic accident than the total population. This may be partially due to the fact that only 0.8% of Alaska’s population is 85 and older, the lowest share of any state.

To identify the states where driving is the most dangerous for seniors, 24/7 Wall St. compared traffic fatality rates for residents 65 and older and for the entire state population. Data for these rates are from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and are as of 2014, the most current available. Populations by age are from the 2014 American Consumer Survey from the U.S. Census Bureau.

These are the most dangerous states to drive for seniors.

Family trip new mexico
Thinkstock

50. New Mexico
> Traffic fatality risk for elderly vs. total pop.: 38.4% less likely
> Traffic fatalities, 65 and older: 11.3 per 100,000 (20th lowest)
> Traffic fatalities, total pop.: 18.4 per 100,000 (4th highest)
> Pct. pop. 85 and older: 1.6% (tied-11th lowest)

Fargo, North Dakota 2
Thinkstock

49. North Dakota
> Traffic fatality risk for elderly vs. total pop.: 32.0% less likely
> Traffic fatalities, 65 and older: 12.4 per 100,000 (23rd lowest)
> Traffic fatalities, total pop.: 18.3 per 100,000 (5th highest)
> Pct. pop. 85 and older: 2.3% (9th highest)

Alaska
Thinkstock

48. Alaska
> Traffic fatality risk for elderly vs. total pop.: 27.8% less likely
> Traffic fatalities, 65 and older: 7.2 per 100,000 (2nd lowest)
> Traffic fatalities, total pop.: 9.9 per 100,000 (23rd lowest)
> Pct. pop. 85 and older: 0.8% (the lowest)

Aerial view of downtown New Orleans, Louisiana
Thinkstock

47. Louisiana
> Traffic fatality risk for elderly vs. total pop.: 20.0% less likely
> Traffic fatalities, 65 and older: 12.7 per 100,000 (25th lowest)
> Traffic fatalities, total pop.: 15.9 per 100,000 (10th highest)
> Pct. pop. 85 and older: 1.6% (tied-11th lowest)

National Bison Range Montana
Wikimedia Commons

46. Montana
> Traffic fatality risk for elderly vs. total pop.: 9.1% less likely
> Traffic fatalities, 65 and older: 17.0 per 100,000 (10th highest)
> Traffic fatalities, total pop.: 18.8 per 100,000 (3rd highest)
> Pct. pop. 85 and older: 2.0% (tied-23rd highest)

Biloxi Beach at Sunset, Mississippi
Thinkstock

45. Mississippi
> Traffic fatality risk for elderly vs. total pop.: 8.8% less likely
> Traffic fatalities, 65 and older: 18.5 per 100,000 (5th highest)
> Traffic fatalities, total pop.: 20.3 per 100,000 (2nd highest)
> Pct. pop. 85 and older: 1.7% (tied-18th lowest)

Traffic Out of Charleston, South Carolina
Thinkstock

44. South Carolina
> Traffic fatality risk for elderly vs. total pop.: 2.2% less likely
> Traffic fatalities, 65 and older: 16.7 per 100,000 (13th highest)
> Traffic fatalities, total pop.: 17.1 per 100,000 (7th highest)
> Pct. pop. 85 and older: 1.7% (tied-18th lowest)

Panama City Beach, Florida, view of Front Beach Road at night
Thinkstock

43. Florida
> Traffic fatality risk for elderly vs. total pop.: 1.6% more likely
> Traffic fatalities, 65 and older: 12.7 per 100,000 (25th highest)
> Traffic fatalities, total pop.: 12.5 per 100,000 (20th highest)
> Pct. pop. 85 and older: 2.6% (3rd highest)

Wyoming Winter Traffic Jam
Thinkstock

42. Wyoming
> Traffic fatality risk for elderly vs. total pop.: 1.8% more likely
> Traffic fatalities, 65 and older: 26.1 per 100,000 (the highest)
> Traffic fatalities, total pop.: 25.7 per 100,000 (the highest)
> Pct. pop. 85 and older: 1.4% (6th lowest)

Interstate 91 southbound Vermont
Wikimedia Commons

41. Vermont
> Traffic fatality risk for elderly vs. total pop.: 6.8% more likely
> Traffic fatalities, 65 and older: 7.5 per 100,000 (4th lowest)
> Traffic fatalities, total pop.: 7.0 per 100,000 (9th lowest)
> Pct. pop. 85 and older: 2.1% (tied-14th highest)

Skyline of Hartford Connecticut on a beautiful sunny day
Thinkstock

40. Connecticut
> Traffic fatality risk for elderly vs. total pop.: 7.0% more likely
> Traffic fatalities, 65 and older: 7.4 per 100,000 (3rd lowest)
> Traffic fatalities, total pop.: 6.9 per 100,000 (8th lowest)
> Pct. pop. 85 and older: 2.4% (tied-5th highest)

Crossing the Dauphin Island Bridge Alabama
Thinkstock

39. Alabama
> Traffic fatality risk for elderly vs. total pop.: 7.7% more likely
> Traffic fatalities, 65 and older: 18.2 per 100,000 (7th highest)
> Traffic fatalities, total pop.: 16.9 per 100,000 (8th highest)
> Pct. pop. 85 and older: 1.7% (tied-18th lowest)

Arkansas, Countryside
Thinkstock

38. Arkansas
> Traffic fatality risk for elderly vs. total pop.: 8.1% more likely
> Traffic fatalities, 65 and older: 17.0 per 100,000 (12th highest)
> Traffic fatalities, total pop.: 15.7 per 100,000 (11th highest)
> Pct. pop. 85 and older: 1.9% (tied-25th highest)

Independence Pass Colorado
Wikimedia Commons

37. Colorado
> Traffic fatality risk for elderly vs. total pop.: 11.4% more likely
> Traffic fatalities, 65 and older: 10.2 per 100,000 (12th lowest)
> Traffic fatalities, total pop.: 9.1 per 100,000 (20th lowest)
> Pct. pop. 85 and older: 1.5% (7th lowest)

Wheeling, West Virginia
Thinkstock

36. West Virginia
> Traffic fatality risk for elderly vs. total pop.: 11.6% more likely
> Traffic fatalities, 65 and older: 16.4 per 100,000 (14th highest)
> Traffic fatalities, total pop.: 14.7 per 100,000 (13th highest)
> Pct. pop. 85 and older: 2.1% (tied-14th highest)

Farmland, Indiana, USA
Thinkstock

35. Indiana
> Traffic fatality risk for elderly vs. total pop.: 13.6% more likely
> Traffic fatalities, 65 and older: 12.9 per 100,000 (24th highest)
> Traffic fatalities, total pop.: 11.3 per 100,000 (25th highest)
> Pct. pop. 85 and older: 1.9% (tied-25th highest)

Houston, Texas 3
Thinkstock

34. Texas
> Traffic fatality risk for elderly vs. total pop.: 14.7% more likely
> Traffic fatalities, 65 and older: 15.1 per 100,000 (17th highest)
> Traffic fatalities, total pop.: 13.1 per 100,000 (16th highest)
> Pct. pop. 85 and older: 1.3% (tied-5th lowest)

Kentucky
Thinkstock

33. Kentucky
> Traffic fatality risk for elderly vs. total pop.: 15.7% more likely
> Traffic fatalities, 65 and older: 17.6 per 100,000 (8th highest)
> Traffic fatalities, total pop.: 15.2 per 100,000 (12th highest)
> Pct. pop. 85 and older: 1.8% (tied-23rd lowest)

Nebraska sign
Thinkstock

32. Nebraska
> Traffic fatality risk for elderly vs. total pop.: 17.4% more likely
> Traffic fatalities, 65 and older: 14.0 per 100,000 (20th highest)
> Traffic fatalities, total pop.: 12.0 per 100,000 (21st highest)
> Pct. pop. 85 and older: 2.1% (tied-14th highest)

Driving in the rain north carolina
Thinkstock

31. North Carolina
> Traffic fatality risk for elderly vs. total pop.: 17.7% more likely
> Traffic fatalities, 65 and older: 15.2 per 100,000 (16th highest)
> Traffic fatalities, total pop.: 12.9 per 100,000 (18th highest)
> Pct. pop. 85 and older: 1.7% (tied-18th lowest)

Wisconsin Highway 110
Wikimedia Commons

30. Wisconsin
> Traffic fatality risk for elderly vs. total pop.: 18.0% more likely
> Traffic fatalities, 65 and older: 10.4 per 100,000 (14th lowest)
> Traffic fatalities, total pop.: 8.8 per 100,000 (17th lowest)
> Pct. pop. 85 and older: 2.2% (tied-10th highest)

Automobile Alley Oklahoma City
Wikimedia Commons

29. Oklahoma
> Traffic fatality risk for elderly vs. total pop.: 18.7% more likely
> Traffic fatalities, 65 and older: 20.5 per 100,000 (2nd highest)
> Traffic fatalities, total pop.: 17.3 per 100,000 (6th highest)
> Pct. pop. 85 and older: 1.7% (tied-18th lowest)

Georgia
Thinkstock

28. Georgia
> Traffic fatality risk for elderly vs. total pop.: 19.5% more likely
> Traffic fatalities, 65 and older: 13.8 per 100,000 (21st highest)
> Traffic fatalities, total pop.: 11.5 per 100,000 (22nd highest)
> Pct. pop. 85 and older: 1.3% (tied-5th lowest)

Hawthorne (Mineral County), Nevada
Wikimedia Commons

27. Nevada
> Traffic fatality risk for elderly vs. total pop.: 19.8% more likely
> Traffic fatalities, 65 and older: 12.2 per 100,000 (22nd lowest)
> Traffic fatalities, total pop.: 10.2 per 100,000 (24th lowest)
> Pct. pop. 85 and older: 1.3% (tied-5th lowest)

Baltimore, Maryland
Thinkstock

26. Maryland
> Traffic fatality risk for elderly vs. total pop.: 20.0% more likely
> Traffic fatalities, 65 and older: 8.6 per 100,000 (6th lowest)
> Traffic fatalities, total pop.: 7.2 per 100,000 (10th lowest)
> Pct. pop. 85 and older: 1.8% (tied-23rd lowest)

Cheshire County, New Hampshire
Wikimedia Commons

25. New Hampshire
> Traffic fatality risk for elderly vs. total pop.: 20.1% more likely
> Traffic fatalities, 65 and older: 8.9 per 100,000 (7th lowest)
> Traffic fatalities, total pop.: 7.4 per 100,000 (12th lowest)
> Pct. pop. 85 and older: 2.1% (tied-14th highest)

South Dakota
Thinkstock

24. South Dakota
> Traffic fatality risk for elderly vs. total pop.: 21.2% more likely
> Traffic fatalities, 65 and older: 19.3 per 100,000 (3rd highest)
> Traffic fatalities, total pop.: 15.9 per 100,000 (9th highest)
> Pct. pop. 85 and older: 2.4% (tied-5th highest)

Iowa
Thinkstock

23. Iowa
> Traffic fatality risk for elderly vs. total pop.: 22.3% more likely
> Traffic fatalities, 65 and older: 12.6 per 100,000 (24th lowest)
> Traffic fatalities, total pop.: 10.3 per 100,000 (25th lowest)
> Pct. pop. 85 and older: 2.4% (tied-5th highest)

Arizona road
Thinkstock

22. Arizona
> Traffic fatality risk for elderly vs. total pop.: 23.3% more likely
> Traffic fatalities, 65 and older: 14.1 per 100,000 (19th highest)
> Traffic fatalities, total pop.: 11.4 per 100,000 (23rd highest)
> Pct. pop. 85 and older: 1.8% (tied-23rd lowest)

Michigan winter driving
Thinkstock

21. Michigan
> Traffic fatality risk for elderly vs. total pop.: 24.3% more likely
> Traffic fatalities, 65 and older: 11.3 per 100,000 (19th lowest)
> Traffic fatalities, total pop.: 9.1 per 100,000 (19th lowest)
> Pct. pop. 85 and older: 2.1% (tied-14th highest)

Richmond, Virginia
Thinkstock

20. Virginia
> Traffic fatality risk for elderly vs. total pop.: 25.0% more likely
> Traffic fatalities, 65 and older: 10.6 per 100,000 (16th lowest)
> Traffic fatalities, total pop.: 8.4 per 100,000 (14th lowest)
> Pct. pop. 85 and older: 1.7% (tied-18th lowest)

Cincinnati, Ohio
Thinkstock

19. Ohio
> Traffic fatality risk for elderly vs. total pop.: 25.1% more likely
> Traffic fatalities, 65 and older: 10.9 per 100,000 (18th lowest)
> Traffic fatalities, total pop.: 8.7 per 100,000 (15th lowest)
> Pct. pop. 85 and older: 2.1% (tied-14th highest)

St. Louis, Missouri
Thinkstock

18. Missouri
> Traffic fatality risk for elderly vs. total pop.: 26.6% more likely
> Traffic fatalities, 65 and older: 16.0 per 100,000 (15th highest)
> Traffic fatalities, total pop.: 12.6 per 100,000 (19th highest)
> Pct. pop. 85 and older: 2.0% (tied-23rd highest)

Downtown Nashville
Thinkstock

17. Tennessee
> Traffic fatality risk for elderly vs. total pop.: 28.3% more likely
> Traffic fatalities, 65 and older: 18.8 per 100,000 (4th highest)
> Traffic fatalities, total pop.: 14.7 per 100,000 (14th highest)
> Pct. pop. 85 and older: 1.6% (tied-11th lowest)

Rear view of traffic on a street, Rodeo Drive, Los Angeles, California, USA
Thinkstock

16. California
> Traffic fatality risk for elderly vs. total pop.: 29.8% more likely
> Traffic fatalities, 65 and older: 11.7 per 100,000 (21st lowest)
> Traffic fatalities, total pop.: 9.0 per 100,000 (18th lowest)
> Pct. pop. 85 and older: 1.7% (tied-18th lowest)

Oregon - Columbia Gorge winding highway with semi trucks evening traffic
Thinkstock

15. Oregon
> Traffic fatality risk for elderly vs. total pop.: 29.8% more likely
> Traffic fatalities, 65 and older: 10.3 per 100,000 (13th lowest)
> Traffic fatalities, total pop.: 7.9 per 100,000 (13th lowest)
> Pct. pop. 85 and older: 2.1% (tied-14th highest)

Massachusetts
Thinkstock

14. Massachusetts
> Traffic fatality risk for elderly vs. total pop.: 31.6% more likely
> Traffic fatalities, 65 and older: 6.4 per 100,000 (the lowest)
> Traffic fatalities, total pop.: 4.9 per 100,000 (the lowest)
> Pct. pop. 85 and older: 2.2% (tied-10th highest)

Delaware Route 41
Wikimedia Commons

13. Delaware
> Traffic fatality risk for elderly vs. total pop.: 35.8% more likely
> Traffic fatalities, 65 and older: 17.6 per 100,000 (9th highest)
> Traffic fatalities, total pop.: 12.9 per 100,000 (17th highest)
> Pct. pop. 85 and older: 1.8% (tied-23rd lowest)

Busy city highway at twilight.
Thinkstock

12. Illinois
> Traffic fatality risk for elderly vs. total pop.: 38.8% more likely
> Traffic fatalities, 65 and older: 10.0 per 100,000 (11th lowest)
> Traffic fatalities, total pop.: 7.2 per 100,000 (11th lowest)
> Pct. pop. 85 and older: 1.9% (tied-25th highest)

Kansas freeway
Thinkstock

11. Kansas
> Traffic fatality risk for elderly vs. total pop.: 39.1% more likely
> Traffic fatalities, 65 and older: 18.4 per 100,000 (6th highest)
> Traffic fatalities, total pop.: 13.3 per 100,000 (15th highest)
> Pct. pop. 85 and older: 2.1% (tied-14th highest)

Seattle, Washington roads
Thinkstock

10. Washington
> Traffic fatality risk for elderly vs. total pop.: 42.9% more likely
> Traffic fatalities, 65 and older: 13.4 per 100,000 (22nd highest)
> Traffic fatalities, total pop.: 9.3 per 100,000 (21st lowest)
> Pct. pop. 85 and older: 1.8% (tied-23rd lowest)

Philadelphia skyline - Pennsylvania - USA United States of America
Thinkstock

9. Pennsylvania
> Traffic fatality risk for elderly vs. total pop.: 44.1% more likely
> Traffic fatalities, 65 and older: 9.6 per 100,000 (10th lowest)
> Traffic fatalities, total pop.: 6.7 per 100,000 (7th lowest)
> Pct. pop. 85 and older: 2.5% (4th highest)

Utah
Thinkstock

8. Utah
> Traffic fatality risk for elderly vs. total pop.: 44.8% more likely
> Traffic fatalities, 65 and older: 9.5 per 100,000 (9th lowest)
> Traffic fatalities, total pop.: 6.5 per 100,000 (5th lowest)
> Pct. pop. 85 and older: 1.1% (2nd lowest)

Hawaii road
Thinkstock

7. Hawaii
> Traffic fatality risk for elderly vs. total pop.: 45.8% more likely
> Traffic fatalities, 65 and older: 9.1 per 100,000 (8th lowest)
> Traffic fatalities, total pop.: 6.2 per 100,000 (4th lowest)
> Pct. pop. 85 and older: 2.7% (tied-the highest)

New Jersey Turnpike
Wikimedia Commons

6. New Jersey
> Traffic fatality risk for elderly vs. total pop.: 48.1% more likely
> Traffic fatalities, 65 and older: 12.9 per 100,000 (23rd highest)
> Traffic fatalities, total pop.: 8.7 per 100,000 (16th lowest)
> Pct. pop. 85 and older: 2.2% (tied-10th highest)

Idaho welcome sign
Thinkstock

5. Idaho
> Traffic fatality risk for elderly vs. total pop.: 49.6% more likely
> Traffic fatalities, 65 and older: 17.0 per 100,000 (11th highest)
> Traffic fatalities, total pop.: 11.4 per 100,000 (24th highest)
> Pct. pop. 85 and older: 1.6% (tied-11th lowest)

Road in Acadia National Park Maine
Thinkstock

4. Maine
> Traffic fatality risk for elderly vs. total pop.: 50.7% more likely
> Traffic fatalities, 65 and older: 14.8 per 100,000 (18th highest)
> Traffic fatalities, total pop.: 9.8 per 100,000 (22nd lowest)
> Pct. pop. 85 and older: 2.4% (tied-5th highest)

Brooklyn, Kings County, New York
Thinkstock

3. New York
> Traffic fatality risk for elderly vs. total pop.: 56.2% more likely
> Traffic fatalities, 65 and older: 8.2 per 100,000 (5th lowest)
> Traffic fatalities, total pop.: 5.3 per 100,000 (3rd lowest)
> Pct. pop. 85 and older: 2.2% (tied-10th highest)

Minnesota
Thinkstock

2. Minnesota
> Traffic fatality risk for elderly vs. total pop.: 59.4% more likely
> Traffic fatalities, 65 and older: 10.5 per 100,000 (15th lowest)
> Traffic fatalities, total pop.: 6.6 per 100,000 (6th lowest)
> Pct. pop. 85 and older: 2.1% (tied-14th highest)

Warwick, Rhode Island, Kent County
Thinkstock

1. Rhode Island
> Traffic fatality risk for elderly vs. total pop.: 118.5% more likely
> Traffic fatalities, 65 and older: 10.8 per 100,000 (17th lowest)
> Traffic fatalities, total pop.: 4.9 per 100,000 (2nd lowest)
> Pct. pop. 85 and older: 2.7% (tied-the highest)

Get Ready To Retire (Sponsored)

Start by taking a quick retirement quiz from SmartAsset that will match you with up to 3 financial advisors that serve your area and beyond in 5 minutes, or less.

Each advisor has been vetted by SmartAsset and is held to a fiduciary standard to act in your best interests.

Here’s how it works:
1. Answer SmartAsset advisor match quiz
2. Review your pre-screened matches at your leisure. Check out the advisors’ profiles.
3. Speak with advisors at no cost to you. Have an introductory call on the phone or introduction in person and choose whom to work with in the future

Get started right here.

Thank you for reading! Have some feedback for us?
Contact the 24/7 Wall St. editorial team.