Special Report

America's 25 Most Affordable Housing Markets

Thinkstock

The U.S. housing market improved over the course of 2016. Home purchases are up, foreclosure activity is down, and in a vote of confidence for the U.S. economy, the Federal Reserve announced last year it would hike its benchmark interest rate.

Owning a home — for those who can afford the down payment — continues to be more affordable than renting in most of the United States. Despite the indications of economic strength, rents and home prices are rising faster than wages in most housing markets across the nation.

Americans deciding whether to rent, buy, or move usually consider very carefully the timing and location of their potential home purchases. To highlight the regional patterns of the U.S. housing market, 24/7 Wall St. reviewed homeownership and rental affordability measures in over 500 counties nationwide based on a comparison of regional monthly home payments and rents to average monthly wages.

Click here to see the nation’s most affordable housing markets.

The most affordable housing markets are not necessarily the most desirable areas. In fact, low rental costs are often the result of weak demand. Some of the areas on this list include counties such as Madison County, Tennessee, where the typical rent actually declined by 6.4%, versus the average rent increase of over 4% across the more than 500 counties reviewed. The year-over-year rent increase was above that average in only six of the 25 most affordable areas.

In an interview with 24/7 Wall St., Daren Blomquist, senior vice president with property and real estate data company ATTOM Data Solutions, described increasing rent prices as part of a vicious cycle. High home prices encourage more renting, which pushes up the demand and prices for rentals. Eventually, at high enough rental prices, buying becomes more attractive.

This means that in the relatively affordable housing markets where rental prices are increasing slowly or even declining, there is relatively little demand for rental housing. Indeed, in all of these 25 markets, buying is cheaper than renting without exception.

Nationwide, especially in the relatively unaffordable counties on this list, wages are not keeping pace with rising rents and home prices. The pattern holds even in relatively affordable markets. Rent and or home price increases are outpacing wage growth in all but four of the 25 most affordable markets. For Blomquist, this trend is unsustainable. “Eventually, [rising rents and home prices] have to be supported by incomes,” he said.

To identify the most affordable housing markets, 24/7 Wall St. reviewed home affordability and rental affordability for U.S. counties from an analysis by ATTOM Data Solutions of U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development data. For the ranking, we calculated a weighted average of the homeownership and rental affordability measures in each county, weighted by the percentages of owner- and renter-occupied housing units. Home prices and wage data — used to determine whether home prices or wages or whether rents or wages are rising faster in each market — also came from ATTOM.

Rental affordability is median fair market rent for a three-bedroom property as a percentage of the average monthly wage (based on average weekly wages). Home buying affordability is the monthly house payment for a median-priced home (based on a 3% down payment and including mortgage, property tax, homeowner’s insurance and private mortgage insurance) as a percentage of the average monthly wage.

These are the nation’s most affordable housing markets.

Floyd County, Georgia
Wikimedia Commons

25. Floyd, Georgia
> Ownership cost as % of monthly wage: 18.6% of $3,324
> Rent as % of monthly wage: 28.6% of $3,324
> Home prices or wages rising faster: HOME PRICES
> Rents or wages rising faster: WAGES

[in-text-ad]

Genesee County, Michigan
Wikimedia Commons

24. Genesee, Michigan
> Ownership cost as % of monthly wage: 20.2% of $3,584
> Rent as % of monthly wage: 28.7% of $3,584
> Home prices or wages rising faster: HOME PRICES
> Rents or wages rising faster: WAGES

Coal Power Plant, Sheboygan, Wisconsin
Thinkstock

23. Sheboygan, Wisconsin
> Ownership cost as % of monthly wage: 21.1% of $3,579
> Rent as % of monthly wage: 26.3% of $3,579
> Home prices or wages rising faster: HOME PRICES
> Rents or wages rising faster: RENTS

Woodbury County, Iowa
Wikimedia Commons

22. Woodbury, Iowa
> Ownership cost as % of monthly wage: 20.3% of $3,696
> Rent as % of monthly wage: 27.1% of $3,696
> Home prices or wages rising faster: HOME PRICES
> Rents or wages rising faster: WAGES

[in-text-ad-2]

Jackson County, Michigan
Wikimedia Commons

21. Jackson, Michigan
> Ownership cost as % of monthly wage: 19.7% of $3,636
> Rent as % of monthly wage: 29.2% of $3,636
> Home prices or wages rising faster: HOME PRICES
> Rents or wages rising faster: WAGES

Madison Parish, Louisiana
Wikimedia Commons

20. Madison, Tennessee
> Ownership cost as % of monthly wage: 18.1% of $3,371
> Rent as % of monthly wage: 30.1% of $3,371
> Home prices or wages rising faster: WAGES
> Rents or wages rising faster: WAGES

[in-text-ad]

Cleveland, Ohio, Cuyahoga County
Thinkstock

19. Cuyahoga, Ohio
> Ownership cost as % of monthly wage: 19.9% of $4,312
> Rent as % of monthly wage: 25.5% of $4,312
> Home prices or wages rising faster: HOME PRICES
> Rents or wages rising faster: WAGES

Clayton County, Georgia
Wikimedia Commons

18. Clayton, Georgia
> Ownership cost as % of monthly wage: 10.8% of $4,047
> Rent as % of monthly wage: 34.2% of $4,047
> Home prices or wages rising faster: HOME PRICES
> Rents or wages rising faster: RENTS

Coffee County Tennessee
Thinkstock

17. Coffee, Tennessee
> Ownership cost as % of monthly wage: 19.6% of $3,514
> Rent as % of monthly wage: 27.5% of $3,514
> Home prices or wages rising faster: HOME PRICES
> Rents or wages rising faster: RENTS

[in-text-ad-2]

Spartanburg County Courthouse
Wikimedia Commons

16. Spartanburg, South Carolina
> Ownership cost as % of monthly wage: 20.2% of $3,744
> Rent as % of monthly wage: 26.5% of $3,744
> Home prices or wages rising faster: HOME PRICES
> Rents or wages rising faster: RENTS

Augusta, Richmond County, Georgia
Thinkstock

15. Richmond, Georgia
> Ownership cost as % of monthly wage: 15.5% of $3,553
> Rent as % of monthly wage: 30.6% of $3,553
> Home prices or wages rising faster: HOME PRICES
> Rents or wages rising faster: RENTS

[in-text-ad]

Peoria, Illinois
Thinkstock

14. Peoria, Illinois
> Ownership cost as % of monthly wage: 20.0% of $4,021
> Rent as % of monthly wage: 25.9% of $4,021
> Home prices or wages rising faster: WAGES
> Rents or wages rising faster: RENTS

Charleston, West Virginia 2
Thinkstock

13. Kanawha, West Virginia
> Ownership cost as % of monthly wage: 19.6% of $3,748
> Rent as % of monthly wage: 26.3% of $3,748
> Home prices or wages rising faster: WAGES
> Rents or wages rising faster: WAGES

Lawrence County, Pennsylvania
Thinkstock

12. Lawrence, Pennsylvania
> Ownership cost as % of monthly wage: 18.3% of $3,133
> Rent as % of monthly wage: 31.4% of $3,133
> Home prices or wages rising faster: HOME PRICES
> Rents or wages rising faster: RENTS

[in-text-ad-2]

View of state capitol in Montgomery, Alabama
Thinkstock

11. Montgomery, Alabama
> Ownership cost as % of monthly wage: 14.1% of $3,614
> Rent as % of monthly wage: 31.4% of $3,614
> Home prices or wages rising faster: WAGES
> Rents or wages rising faster: RENTS

Aiken County, South Carolina
Wikimedia Commons

10. Aiken, South Carolina
> Ownership cost as % of monthly wage: 18.7% of $3,896
> Rent as % of monthly wage: 27.9% of $3,896
> Home prices or wages rising faster: HOME PRICES
> Rents or wages rising faster: RENTS

[in-text-ad]

Huntsville, Alabama
Thinkstock

9. Madison, Alabama
> Ownership cost as % of monthly wage: 19.2% of $4,550
> Rent as % of monthly wage: 23.9% of $4,550
> Home prices or wages rising faster: HOME PRICES
> Rents or wages rising faster: RENTS

Saginaw, Michigan
Wikimedia Commons

8. Saginaw, Michigan
> Ownership cost as % of monthly wage: 16.4% of $3,410
> Rent as % of monthly wage: 31.0% of $3,410
> Home prices or wages rising faster: HOME PRICES
> Rents or wages rising faster: RENTS

Sullivan County Tennessee
Wikimedia Commons

7. Sullivan, Tennessee
> Ownership cost as % of monthly wage: 18.5% of $3,497
> Rent as % of monthly wage: 25.4% of $3,497
> Home prices or wages rising faster: WAGES
> Rents or wages rising faster: WAGES

[in-text-ad-2]

Bay City Michigan
Wikimedia Commons

6. Bay, Michigan
> Ownership cost as % of monthly wage: 16.6% of $3,293
> Rent as % of monthly wage: 31.0% of $3,293
> Home prices or wages rising faster: HOME PRICES
> Rents or wages rising faster: RENTS

Rock Island County Illinois
Wikimedia Commons

5. Rock Island, Illinois
> Ownership cost as % of monthly wage: 17.5% of $4,052
> Rent as % of monthly wage: 25.3% of $4,052
> Home prices or wages rising faster: WAGES
> Rents or wages rising faster: RENTS

[in-text-ad]

Warren, Ohio
Wikimedia Commons

4. Trumbull, Ohio
> Ownership cost as % of monthly wage: 16.1% of $3,267
> Rent as % of monthly wage: 27.7% of $3,267
> Home prices or wages rising faster: WAGES
> Rents or wages rising faster: WAGES

Downtown Detroit
Thinkstock

3. Wayne, Michigan
> Ownership cost as % of monthly wage: 14.4% of $4,710
> Rent as % of monthly wage: 27.5% of $4,710
> Home prices or wages rising faster: HOME PRICES
> Rents or wages rising faster: RENTS

Clinton, Tennessee
Wikimedia Commons

2. Anderson, Tennessee
> Ownership cost as % of monthly wage: 16.4% of $4,489
> Rent as % of monthly wage: 25.1% of $4,489
> Home prices or wages rising faster: HOME PRICES
> Rents or wages rising faster: RENTS

[in-text-ad-2]

Greeneville, Tennessee
Wikimedia Commons

1. Greene, Tennessee
> Ownership cost as % of monthly wage: 14.5% of $3,055
> Rent as % of monthly wage: 29.6% of $3,055
> Home prices or wages rising faster: WAGES
> Rents or wages rising faster: RENTS

Get Ready To Retire (Sponsored)

Start by taking a quick retirement quiz from SmartAsset that will match you with up to 3 financial advisors that serve your area and beyond in 5 minutes, or less.

Each advisor has been vetted by SmartAsset and is held to a fiduciary standard to act in your best interests.

Here’s how it works:
1. Answer SmartAsset advisor match quiz
2. Review your pre-screened matches at your leisure. Check out the advisors’ profiles.
3. Speak with advisors at no cost to you. Have an introductory call on the phone or introduction in person and choose whom to work with in the future

Get started right here.

Thank you for reading! Have some feedback for us?
Contact the 24/7 Wall St. editorial team.