Special Report
Cities Where It's Easiest to Buy a House for Less Than $100K
Published:
Last Updated:
Homeownership is, for many, the realization of the American dream. However, the sale price of the typical American home has climbed substantially in recent years — from about $214,000 in 2009 to nearly $316,000 in mid-2018. While increasing home values may discourage some potential buyers, owning a home does not have to break the bank — even in many urban markets, which are traditionally more expensive.
In every U.S. city, including some of the most expensive, like New York City and San Francisco, there are homes valued at less than $100,000. However, in these cities and others like them, low property values are the exception and not the rule. For those willing to live in smaller, less prominent cities, low-cost homes are widely available.
24/7 Wall St. reviewed median home value data from the U.S. Census Bureau to identify the cities where it’s easiest to buy a house for less than $100,000. We only ranked cities with populations of at least 100,000 where the majority of homes are worth less than $100,000.
The cities on this list are largely concentrated in the Midwest and upstate New York and have had slower than typical population growth in recent years. Many cities on this list, including Cleveland, Detroit, and Buffalo, New York, have had declining populations for decades.
In addition to reduced demand for housing precipitated by falling populations, low incomes also partially explain low housing costs in these cities. In each of the 20 cities on this list, the typical household earns over $12,000 less than the $57,652 national median income. Still, even taking lower incomes into account, housing in these cities is more affordable than it is nationwide on average.
Click here to see the cities where it’s easiest to buy a house for less than $100,000.
Click here to read our methodology.
20. Augusta-Richmond County, Georgia
> Median home value: $99,900
> Homes worth less than $100,000: 50.1%
> Median home size: 5.6 rooms
> Median household income: $39,258
> 5-year pop. change: +0.6%
[in-text-ad]
19. Beaumont, Texas
> Median home value: $99,800
> Homes worth less than $100,000: 50.2%
> Median home size: 5.3 rooms
> Median household income: $45,268
> 5-year pop. change: +0.6%
18. Wichita Falls, Texas
> Median home value: $96,700
> Homes worth less than $100,000: 52.0%
> Median home size: 5.2 rooms
> Median household income: $44,285
> 5-year pop. change: +0.5%
17. Memphis, Tennessee
> Median home value: $94,200
> Homes worth less than $100,000: 53.4%
> Median home size: 5.2 rooms
> Median household income: $38,230
> 5-year pop. change: +0.6%
[in-text-ad-2]
16. Syracuse, New York
> Median home value: $91,100
> Homes worth less than $100,000: 58.6%
> Median home size: 5.3 rooms
> Median household income: $34,716
> 5-year pop. change: -0.2%
15. Evansville, Indiana
> Median home value: $89,700
> Homes worth less than $100,000: 59.5%
> Median home size: 5.0 rooms
> Median household income: $36,956
> 5-year pop. change: +0.5%
[in-text-ad]
14. Kansas City, Kansas
> Median home value: $89,500
> Homes worth less than $100,000: 57.7%
> Median home size: 5.3 rooms
> Median household income: $41,671
> 5-year pop. change: +3.7%
13. Rockford, Illinois
> Median home value: $89,500
> Homes worth less than $100,000: 57.6%
> Median home size: 5.4 rooms
> Median household income: $41,991
> 5-year pop. change: -2.8%
12. Jackson, Mississippi
> Median home value: $88,700
> Homes worth less than $100,000: 57.8%
> Median home size: 5.3 rooms
> Median household income: $35,308
> 5-year pop. change: -2.3%
[in-text-ad-2]
11. Birmingham, Alabama
> Median home value: $86,900
> Homes worth less than $100,000: 58.1%
> Median home size: 5.2 rooms
> Median household income: $33,770
> 5-year pop. change: -0.4%
10. Brownsville, Texas
> Median home value: $85,900
> Homes worth less than $100,000: 60.3%
> Median home size: 5.0 rooms
> Median household income: $35,636
> 5-year pop. change: +3.9%
[in-text-ad]
9. South Bend, Indiana
> Median home value: $81,100
> Homes worth less than $100,000: 64.2%
> Median home size: 5.6 rooms
> Median household income: $37,441
> 5-year pop. change: +0.6%
8. Akron, Ohio
> Median home value: $80,100
> Homes worth less than $100,000: 67.9%
> Median home size: 5.5 rooms
> Median household income: $36,223
> 5-year pop. change: -0.9%
7. Rochester, New York
> Median home value: $79,400
> Homes worth less than $100,000: 66.2%
> Median home size: 5.2 rooms
> Median household income: $32,347
> 5-year pop. change: -0.7%
[in-text-ad-2]
6. Toledo, Ohio
> Median home value: $78,600
> Homes worth less than $100,000: 66.5%
> Median home size: 5.5 rooms
> Median household income: $35,808
> 5-year pop. change: -2.8%
5. Buffalo, New York
> Median home value: $77,800
> Homes worth less than $100,000: 61.6%
> Median home size: 5.6 rooms
> Median household income: $34,268
> 5-year pop. change: -0.9%
[in-text-ad]
4. Lansing, Michigan
> Median home value: $77,100
> Homes worth less than $100,000: 71.1%
> Median home size: 5.2 rooms
> Median household income: $38,642
> 5-year pop. change: +0.6%
3. Cleveland, Ohio
> Median home value: $67,600
> Homes worth less than $100,000: 76.5%
> Median home size: 5.2 rooms
> Median household income: $27,854
> 5-year pop. change: -2.3%
2. Dayton, Ohio
> Median home value: $66,500
> Homes worth less than $100,000: 78.0%
> Median home size: 5.3 rooms
> Median household income: $30,128
> 5-year pop. change: -1.2%
[in-text-ad-2]
1. Detroit, Michigan
> Median home value: $42,800
> Homes worth less than $100,000: 85.0%
> Median home size: 5.6 rooms
> Median household income: $27,838
> 5-year pop. change: -5.8%
Methodology
To identify the cities where it’s easiest to buy a house for less than $100,000, 24/7 Wall St. reviewed the median home value in all census designated places, cities, and towns, with at least 100,000 residents. We only ranked areas with median home values below $100,000. Median home value, total share of homes worth less than $100,000, median home size by room count, and median household income all came from the U.S. Census Bureau’s 2017 American Community Survey and are five-year year estimates. Population change was calculated using ACS data.
Want retirement to come a few years earlier than you’d planned? Or are you ready to retire now, but want an extra set of eyes on your finances?
Now you can speak with up to 3 financial experts in your area for FREE. By simply clicking here you can begin to match with financial professionals who can help you build your plan to retire early. And the best part? The first conversation with them is free.
Click here to match with up to 3 financial pros who would be excited to help you make financial decisions.
Thank you for reading! Have some feedback for us?
Contact the 24/7 Wall St. editorial team.