Special Report
The Weather in These US Cities Will be Unrecognizable in 30 Years
Published:
Last Updated:
Preliminary data indicates that 2018 will be the fourth warmest year since record keeping began nearly a century and a half ago. If these projections prove accurate, this year would join the preceding three years as the four warmest on record.
There is widespread consensus among scientists worldwide that our planet is getting warmer — and that human activity is to blame. For over a century, industrialization and the burning of fossil fuels have released certain gases, especially carbon dioxide, into the atmosphere. These gases prevent heat from escaping the atmosphere into space — a phenomenon commonly known as the greenhouse effect.
If drastic action is not soon taken to reduce carbon emissions, the effects of global warming will be devastating in many parts of the world. Here in the United States, rising temperatures will likely bring more extreme weather events, including heat waves, droughts, and severe rain storms. These, in turn, will strain infrastructure and industry.
Using a report recently released by Vox Media, 24/7 Wall St. ranked the U.S. cities where temperature changes will be the most dramatic in the coming years.
We ranked cities based on the projected change in the average summer high temperature from the year 2000 to 2050. Our list only includes cities with a projected change of at least 5 degrees Fahrenheit. We only considered the 100 largest cities by population in the continental United States. The U.S. cities with the largest projected summer temperature change are concentrated in the Midwest.
Vox’s report was put together with the assistance of NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory and the Scripps Institution of Oceanography.
Click here to see the U.S. cities where the weather will be unrecognizable in 30 years.
27. Tulsa, Oklahoma
> 50 yr. change in avg. summer high: +5.0 F
> 50 yr. change in avg. winter low: +3.9 F
> Avg. temp range in 2000: 28.6 F – 91.9 F
> Avg. temp range in 2050: 32.5 F – 96.9 F
> Current population: 402,227
[in-text-ad]
26. Toledo, Ohio
> 50 yr. change in avg. summer high: +5.0 F
> 50 yr. change in avg. winter low: +4.7 F
> Avg. temp range in 2000: 22.4 F – 85.2 F
> Avg. temp range in 2050: 27.0 F – 90.2 F
> Current population: 276,494
25. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
> 50 yr. change in avg. summer high: +5.0 F
> 50 yr. change in avg. winter low: +4.3 F
> Avg. temp range in 2000: 28.2 F – 86.0 F
> Avg. temp range in 2050: 32.6 F – 91.0 F
> Current population: 1,580,863
24. Seattle, Washington
> 50 yr. change in avg. summer high: +5.0 F
> 50 yr. change in avg. winter low: +3.9 F
> Avg. temp range in 2000: 37.9 F – 74.4 F
> Avg. temp range in 2050: 41.8 F – 79.4 F
> Current population: 724,764
[in-text-ad-2]
23. Colorado Springs, Colorado
> 50 yr. change in avg. summer high: +5.0 F
> 50 yr. change in avg. winter low: +4.6 F
> Avg. temp range in 2000: 19.0 F – 82.1 F
> Avg. temp range in 2050: 23.6 F – 87.2 F
> Current population: 464,470
22. Lubbock, Texas
> 50 yr. change in avg. summer high: +5.1 F
> 50 yr. change in avg. winter low: +4.2 F
> Avg. temp range in 2000: 28.7 F – 92.7 F
> Avg. temp range in 2050: 32.9 F – 97.8 F
> Current population: 253,887
[in-text-ad]
21. Wichita, Kansas
> 50 yr. change in avg. summer high: +5.1 F
> 50 yr. change in avg. winter low: +4.2 F
> Avg. temp range in 2000: 23.9 F – 91.6 F
> Avg. temp range in 2050: 28.1 F – 96.8 F
> Current population: 390,599
20. Memphis, Tennessee
> 50 yr. change in avg. summer high: +5.1 F
> 50 yr. change in avg. winter low: +3.5 F
> Avg. temp range in 2000: 33.8 F – 91.1 F
> Avg. temp range in 2050: 37.4 F – 96.2 F
> Current population: 652,231
19. Reno, Nevada
> 50 yr. change in avg. summer high: +5.1 F
> 50 yr. change in avg. winter low: +4.3 F
> Avg. temp range in 2000: 21.9 F – 87.5 F
> Avg. temp range in 2050: 26.2 F – 92.6 F
> Current population: 248,860
[in-text-ad-2]
18. Minneapolis, Minnesota
> 50 yr. change in avg. summer high: +5.3 F
> 50 yr. change in avg. winter low: +7.0 F
> Avg. temp range in 2000: 9.8 F – 82.8 F
> Avg. temp range in 2050: 16.9 F – 88.1 F
> Current population: 422,326
17. Denver, Colorado
> 50 yr. change in avg. summer high: +5.3 F
> 50 yr. change in avg. winter low: +5.0 F
> Avg. temp range in 2000: 21.5 F – 86.4 F
> Avg. temp range in 2050: 26.5 F – 91.7 F
> Current population: 704,621
[in-text-ad]
16. Milwaukee, Wisconsin
> 50 yr. change in avg. summer high: +5.4 F
> 50 yr. change in avg. winter low: +6.0 F
> Avg. temp range in 2000: 18.2 F – 81.8 F
> Avg. temp range in 2050: 24.1 F – 87.2 F
> Current population: 595,365
15. Louisville, Kentucky
> 50 yr. change in avg. summer high: +5.4 F
> 50 yr. change in avg. winter low: +4.0 F
> Avg. temp range in 2000: 28.9 F – 88.6 F
> Avg. temp range in 2050: 32.9 F – 94.0 F
> Current population: 621,337
14. Cleveland, Ohio
> 50 yr. change in avg. summer high: +5.4 F
> 50 yr. change in avg. winter low: +5.3 F
> Avg. temp range in 2000: 23.0 F – 82.3 F
> Avg. temp range in 2050: 28.3 F – 87.7 F
> Current population: 385,552
[in-text-ad-2]
13. Madison, Wisconsin
> 50 yr. change in avg. summer high: +5.4 F
> 50 yr. change in avg. winter low: +6.6 F
> Avg. temp range in 2000: 13.3 F – 82.1 F
> Avg. temp range in 2050: 19.8 F – 87.5 F
> Current population: 255,239
12. Aurora, Colorado
> 50 yr. change in avg. summer high: +5.4 F
> 50 yr. change in avg. winter low: +4.7 F
> Avg. temp range in 2000: 19.2 F – 86.1 F
> Avg. temp range in 2050: 23.9 F – 91.6 F
> Current population: 367,250
[in-text-ad]
11. Indianapolis, Indiana
> 50 yr. change in avg. summer high: +5.4 F
> 50 yr. change in avg. winter low: +4.8 F
> Avg. temp range in 2000: 22.6 F – 85.2 F
> Avg. temp range in 2050: 27.4 F – 90.6 F
> Current population: 857,386
10. Lincoln, Nebraska
> 50 yr. change in avg. summer high: +5.5 F
> 50 yr. change in avg. winter low: +4.8 F
> Avg. temp range in 2000: 17.5 F – 87.8 F
> Avg. temp range in 2050: 22.2 F – 93.2 F
> Current population: 284,734
9. Cincinnati, Ohio
> 50 yr. change in avg. summer high: +5.5 F
> 50 yr. change in avg. winter low: +4.1 F
> Avg. temp range in 2000: 26.6 F – 86.9 F
> Avg. temp range in 2050: 30.7 F – 92.3 F
> Current population: 301,305
[in-text-ad-2]
8. Columbus, Ohio
> 50 yr. change in avg. summer high: +5.5 F
> 50 yr. change in avg. winter low: +4.4 F
> Avg. temp range in 2000: 24.3 F – 84.8 F
> Avg. temp range in 2050: 28.8 F – 90.3 F
> Current population: 881,901
7. Lexington-Fayette, Kentucky
> 50 yr. change in avg. summer high: +5.6 F
> 50 yr. change in avg. winter low: +3.9 F
> Avg. temp range in 2000: 26.8 F – 85.9 F
> Avg. temp range in 2050: 30.7 F – 91.5 F
> Current population: 321,959
[in-text-ad]
6. Omaha, Nebraska
> 50 yr. change in avg. summer high: +5.6 F
> 50 yr. change in avg. winter low: +5.2 F
> Avg. temp range in 2000: 16.4 F – 85.8 F
> Avg. temp range in 2050: 21.6 F – 91.4 F
> Current population: 466,903
5. St. Louis, Missouri
> 50 yr. change in avg. summer high: +5.6 F
> 50 yr. change in avg. winter low: +4.5 F
> Avg. temp range in 2000: 25.2 F – 88.5 F
> Avg. temp range in 2050: 29.7 F – 94.2 F
> Current population: 308,626
4. Chicago, Illinois
> 50 yr. change in avg. summer high: +5.6 F
> 50 yr. change in avg. winter low: +5.8 F
> Avg. temp range in 2000: 21.2 F – 83.5 F
> Avg. temp range in 2050: 27.0 F – 89.2 F
> Current population: 2,716,462
[in-text-ad-2]
3. St. Paul, Minnesota
> 50 yr. change in avg. summer high: +5.7 F
> 50 yr. change in avg. winter low: +6.8 F
> Avg. temp range in 2000: 9.9 F – 82.7 F
> Avg. temp range in 2050: 16.7 F – 88.3 F
> Current population: 306,604
2. Kansas City, Missouri
> 50 yr. change in avg. summer high: +5.8 F
> 50 yr. change in avg. winter low: +4.9 F
> Avg. temp range in 2000: 24.1 F – 88.7 F
> Avg. temp range in 2050: 29.1 F – 94.5 F
> Current population: 488,825
[in-text-ad]
1. Fort Wayne, Indiana
> 50 yr. change in avg. summer high: +5.8 F
> 50 yr. change in avg. winter low: +5.3 F
> Avg. temp range in 2000: 20.4 F – 83.9 F
> Avg. temp range in 2050: 25.8 F – 89.7 F
> Current population: 254,796
A financial advisor can help you understand the advantages and disadvantages of investment properties. Finding a qualified financial advisor doesn’t have to be hard. SmartAsset’s free tool matches you with up to three financial advisors who serve your area, and you can interview your advisor matches at no cost to decide which one is right for you. If you’re ready to find an advisor who can help you achieve your financial goals, get started now.
Investing in real estate can diversify your portfolio. But expanding your horizons may add additional costs. If you’re an investor looking to minimize expenses, consider checking out online brokerages. They often offer low investment fees, helping you maximize your profit.
Thank you for reading! Have some feedback for us?
Contact the 24/7 Wall St. editorial team.