Naming a child is one of the first big responsibilities parents-to-be have, and most try really hard to rise to the occasion. Some are lucky to know exactly what they want to name their baby. Others ask family and friends for advice, consider whether potential nicknames sound funny, and even read Roman mythology. And sometimes, after much consideration, they opt for a classic name, one that won’t cause problems for others to pronounce or spell and one that is likely to be around for a long time — unlike these 25 baby names that are now going extinct. 

To determine the most popular baby names in the 1970s, 24/7 Tempo reviewed data on boy and girl names each year between 1880 and 2018 from the Social Security Administration. We took the 1970-1979 average ranking of each name appearing on any of the SSA’s lists between those years. The names are ranked by the number of boys or girls with a certain name out of the total number of boys and girl births in each year during the 70s.

There is no popular girl’s name from the 70’s that has had the staying power of Michael, though one name was a true stand-out in that decade. Number 98 in the ’50s and number 20 in the ’60s, Jennifer jumped to the very top of the charts in 1970 and remained there until 1984, becoming the second most popular baby name for girls in the ’80s, but falling to number 16 in the ’90s and 39th in the 2000s. By 2018 the name was already considered old fashioned, ranking 345th in today’s popularity rankings.

None of the other top names for baby girls in the 70’s have stood the test of time either: Amy, number 2, was a shooting star in the 70’s, but was no longer among the top 100 by the 2000’s.  Melissa, Michelle, and Kimberly, the next three most popular girls’ names in the ‘70s, stayed in the mix a bit longer, remaining among the top 25 through the last century. Of all the unique, peculiar, and classic names out there,some in particular are becoming more prevalent at an astonishing rate — these are America’s fastest growing first names. 

Girls Names	Number of births (1970-1979)	Share of births (1970-1979)
All Female births	15,451,447
Jennifer	581,772	3.77%
Amy	269,001	1.74%
Melissa	253,282	1.64%
Michelle	249,133	1.61%
Kimberly	229,109	1.48%
Lisa	228,684	1.48%
Angela	225,241	1.46%
Heather	203,929	1.32%
Stephanie	160,466	1.04%
Nicole	144,672	0.94%
Jessica	143,491	0.93%
Elizabeth	142,858	0.92%
Rebecca	137,298	0.89%
Kelly	133,563	0.86%
Mary	126,267	0.82%
Christina	125,737	0.81%
Amanda	123,935	0.80%
Julie	121,941	0.79%
Sarah	118,832	0.77%
Laura	118,212	0.77%
Shannon	113,804	0.74%
Christine	103,233	0.67%
Tammy	98,832	0.64%
Tracy	95,539	0.62%
Karen	95,186	0.62%
Dawn	92,443	0.60%
Susan	88,315	0.57%
Andrea	86,426	0.56%
Tina	84,758	0.55%
Patricia	81,104	0.52%
Cynthia	80,211	0.52%
Lori	77,780	0.50%
Rachel	77,765	0.50%
April	76,940	0.50%

A boy’s name that has been immensely popular over the last seven decades topped the list of baby names in every year of the 1970s — an incredible 4.28% of all American children born in those 10 years were given the name Michael. Though still very popular, the name has lost some of its allure only in the last decade, moving from number 2 in 2008 to number 14 in 2018.

Two other boys’ names that popped in the ’70s were Christopher at number 2 and Jason at 3. Christopher moved up dramatically from 20th place in the ’60’s and 49th in the ’50s. Jason, meanwhile, soared even more in the 1970s. The name ranked only 87th in the ’60s and was nowhere to be seen among the top 200 in the previous decade — meaning that Jason was less common than Rex, Arnold, and Milton just two decades before it became the third most popular name for baby boys.

Christopher remained the most popular boy’s name after Michael through the turn of the century, but then began losing its mojo. It is now number 42. Jason was more of a flash in the pan, losing its star power quickly since the ’70s. It was only the 100th most popular boys name in 2018. In contrast, the 4th and 5th most common baby boy names in the ’70s — David and James — never seem to go out of style, with James ranking number 1 for the last 100 years, and David number 6. While these two are unlikely to decline in popularity, many others are — these are the boys and girls names that are disappearing the fastest. 

Boys Names	Number of births (1970-1979)	Share of births (1970-1979)
All Male births	16,523,413
Michael	707,647	4.28%
Christopher	475,614	2.88%
Jason	462,928	2.80%
David	445,955	2.70%
James	444,948	2.69%
John	402,841	2.44%
Robert	397,407	2.41%
Brian	322,841	1.95%
William	283,564	1.72%
Matthew	277,959	1.68%
Joseph	244,925	1.48%
Daniel	244,557	1.48%
Kevin	212,367	1.29%
Eric	211,569	1.28%
Jeffrey	202,952	1.23%
Richard	202,880	1.23%
Scott	194,671	1.18%
Mark	194,415	1.18%
Steven	188,174	1.14%
Thomas	186,880	1.13%
Timothy	181,340	1.10%
Anthony	174,941	1.06%
Charles	163,110	0.99%
Joshua	140,396	0.85%
Ryan	139,734	0.85%
Jeremy	139,353	0.84%
Paul	136,473	0.83%
Andrew	133,061	0.81%
Gregory	115,625	0.70%
Chad	113,579	0.69%
Kenneth	111,542	0.68%
Jonathan	107,983	0.65%
Stephen	107,871	0.65%
Shawn	105,824	0.64%
Aaron	101,528	0.61%
Adam	91,812	0.56%
Patrick	91,297	0.55%
Justin	86,580	0.52%
Sean	83,923	0.51%
Edward	83,502	0.51%
Todd	83,374	0.50%
Donald	82,468	0.50%
Ronald	81,771	0.49%
Benjamin	81,388	0.49%

The rise and fall of the top baby names of the ’70s illustrates a difference between boys’ and girls’ name choices in America: While both are subject to trends, there has always been a reliably popular collection of boys’ names that endure over many decades, while girls’ names tend to be more varied and subject to fashion. 

Seven of the 20 most popular boys’ names in the 1920s were also among the top 20 in the ’70s: Robert, John, James, William, Joseph, Richard, and Thomas. There were also seven boys’ names that ranked among the 20 most popular in both the 70’s and the last decade: William, Michael, James, Joseph, David, Matthew, and Daniel. For girls, only Mary and Elizabeth were on both the ’20s and ’70s top 20 list, and only Elizabeth was listed for both the ’70s and the 2010s. 

Thank you for reading! Have some feedback for us?
Contact the 24/7 Wall St. editorial team.