U.S. population growth slowed to just 0.6% in 2018 — the lowest growth rate in 80 years. The last time the annual population growth was this low, the nation was in the throes of the Great Depression, when job opportunities were limited and there was little optimism about the future.
While the national population growth just hit a historic low, there are towns and cities across the country where even a small 0.6% population bump would be a welcome change. In these places, population decline has been a defining demographic trend for years.
24/7 Wall St. reviewed population changes between 2010 and 2017 in nearly 15,000 cities, towns, villages, and Census designated places to identify the fastest shrinking place in every state. We only considered areas with populations of at least 1,000. To ensure accuracy, we did not consider places where the margin of error for population was greater than 10%. All data are five-year estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.
National population growth is slowing primarily because the country’s population is aging. This also appears to be a factor in many of the cities and towns on this list.
In the fastest shrinking town in 38 states, the median age exceeds the national median of 37.8 years. Similarly, in the vast majority of places on this list, the share of residents 65 and older is greater than the comparable share statewide. While these places tend to have large shares of retirement-age residents, they are not necessarily the places with the oldest populations in their state. These are the oldest counties in every state.
Just like during the Great Depression, when population growth slowed nationwide, in many of these areas, economic conditions are lagging. In the majority of cities and towns on this list, the median household income is lower than it is across their respective state as a whole. This is in stark contrast to the fastest growing place in every state — which tend to be relatively affluent areas.
Click here to see the fastest shrinking place in every state
Click here to see the fastest growing place in every state
Click here to read our methodology
1. Alabama: Tuskegee
> 2010-2017 population change: -13.1% (state: +2.9%)
> Median household income: $27,314 (state: $46,472)
> Annual unemployment: 10.1% (state: 4.3%)
> Total population: 8,852
See all stories featuring: Alabama
[in-text-ad]
2. Alaska: Valdez
> 2010-2017 population change: -0.4% (state: +6.9%)
> Median household income: $94,003 (state: $76,114)
> Annual unemployment: 6.5% (state: 5.2%)
> Total population: 3,921
See all stories featuring: Alaska
24/7 Wall St.
3. Arizona: New Kingman-Butler
> 2010-2017 population change: -9.9% (state: +9.0%)
> Median household income: $31,923 (state: $53,510)
> Annual unemployment: 9.3% (state: 4.2%)
> Total population: 13,060
See all stories featuring: Arizona
4. Arkansas: Brinkley
> 2010-2017 population change: -14.1% (state: +3.7%)
> Median household income: $31,694 (state: $43,813)
> Annual unemployment: 5.5% (state: 3.6%)
> Total population: 2,854
See all stories featuring: Arkansas
[in-text-ad-2]
5. California: Willowbrook
> 2010-2017 population change: -35.6% (state: +6.4%)
> Median household income: $40,279 (state: $67,169)
> Annual unemployment: 7.3% (state: 4.8%)
> Total population: 22,654
See all stories featuring: California
6. Colorado: Air Force Academy
> 2010-2017 population change: -26.1% (state: +11.2%)
> Median household income: $70,179 (state: $65,458)
> Annual unemployment: 0.3% (state: 3.5%)
> Total population: 6,098
See all stories featuring: Colorado
[in-text-ad]
7. Connecticut: Pawcatuck
> 2010-2017 population change: -13.8% (state: +1.4%)
> Median household income: $57,780 (state: $73,781)
> Annual unemployment: 5.2% (state: 4.8%)
> Total population: 4,999
See all stories featuring: Connecticut
8. Delaware: North Star
> 2010-2017 population change: -6.8% (state: +7.1%)
> Median household income: $141,618 (state: $63,036)
> Annual unemployment: 1.3% (state: 4.0%)
> Total population: 7,390
See all stories featuring: Delaware
9. Florida: Zephyrhills West
> 2010-2017 population change: -19.2% (state: +9.5%)
> Median household income: $33,558 (state: $50,883)
> Annual unemployment: 3.1% (state: 4.2%)
> Total population: 4,734
See all stories featuring: Florida
[in-text-ad-2]
10. Georgia: Reidsville
> 2010-2017 population change: -38.2% (state: +7.7%)
> Median household income: $24,500 (state: $52,977)
> Annual unemployment: 1.6% (state: 4.7%)
> Total population: 2,652
See all stories featuring: Georgia
11. Hawaii: Ahuimanu
> 2010-2017 population change: -17.2% (state: +6.6%)
> Median household income: $103,825 (state: $74,923)
> Annual unemployment: 2.8% (state: 3.0%)
> Total population: 8,085
See all stories featuring: Hawaii
[in-text-ad]
12. Idaho: Kamiah
> 2010-2017 population change: -12.3% (state: +8.6%)
> Median household income: $36,905 (state: $50,985)
> Annual unemployment: 5.3% (state: 3.3%)
> Total population: 1,267
See all stories featuring: Idaho
24/7 Wall St.
13. Illinois: Mount Carroll
> 2010-2017 population change: -19.1% (state: +0.9%)
> Median household income: $42,404 (state: $61,229)
> Annual unemployment: 3% (state: 4.8%)
> Total population: 1,475
See all stories featuring: Illinois
14. Indiana: Shorewood Forest
> 2010-2017 population change: -16.7% (state: +3.1%)
> Median household income: $102,950 (state: $52,182)
> Annual unemployment: 1% (state: 3.9%)
> Total population: 2,512
See all stories featuring: Indiana
[in-text-ad-2]
15. Iowa: Reinbeck
> 2010-2017 population change: -17.1% (state: +3.4%)
> Median household income: $59,453 (state: $56,570)
> Annual unemployment: 4% (state: 2.8%)
> Total population: 1,628
See all stories featuring: Iowa
16. Kansas: Belleville
> 2010-2017 population change: -15.9% (state: +0.9%)
> Median household income: $42,406 (state: $61,229)
> Annual unemployment: 4.5% (state: 4.8%)
> Total population: 42,283
See all stories featuring: Kansas
[in-text-ad]
17. Kentucky: Fort Knox
> 2010-2017 population change: -23.8% (state: +3.2%)
> Median household income: $55,196 (state: $46,535)
> Annual unemployment: 1.6% (state: 4.0%)
> Total population: 9,092
See all stories featuring: Kentucky
18. Louisiana: Jefferson
> 2010-2017 population change: -13.1% (state: +5.3%)
> Median household income: $46,199 (state: $46,710)
> Annual unemployment: 3.8% (state: 4.3%)
> Total population: 10,469
See all stories featuring: Louisiana
19. Maine: Madawaska
> 2010-2017 population change: -18.4% (state: +0.2%)
> Median household income: $37,753 (state: $53,024)
> Annual unemployment: 0% (state: 3.3%)
> Total population: 2,816
See all stories featuring: Maine
[in-text-ad-2]
20. Maryland: Friendship Heights Village
> 2010-2017 population change: -12.4% (state: +5.3%)
> Median household income: $92,593 (state: $78,916)
> Annual unemployment: 2.6% (state: 4.1%)
> Total population: 5,051
See all stories featuring: Maryland
21. Massachusetts: North Scituate
> 2010-2017 population change: -11.0% (state: +4.8%)
> Median household income: $104,159 (state: $74,167)
> Annual unemployment: 4% (state: 4.0%)
> Total population: 4,890
See all stories featuring: Massachusetts
[in-text-ad]
22. Michigan: Beecher
> 2010-2017 population change: -19.9% (state: -0.3%)
> Median household income: $23,856 (state: $52,668)
> Annual unemployment: 11.3% (state: 4.5%)
> Total population: 9,490
See all stories featuring: Michigan
23. Minnesota: Appleton
> 2010-2017 population change: -33.5% (state: +4.7%)
> Median household income: $35,300 (state: $65,699)
> Annual unemployment: 5.6% (state: 3.0%)
> Total population: 1,449
See all stories featuring: Minnesota
24. Mississippi: Winona
> 2010-2017 population change: -12.3% (state: +4.7%)
> Median household income: $43,551 (state: $65,699)
> Annual unemployment: 4.8% (state: 3.0%)
> Total population: 27,153
See all stories featuring: Mississippi
[in-text-ad-2]
25. Missouri: Spanish Lake
> 2010-2017 population change: -15.1% (state: +2.6%)
> Median household income: $37,929 (state: $51,542)
> Annual unemployment: 10.6% (state: 3.6%)
> Total population: 18,511
See all stories featuring: Missouri
26. Montana: Malmstrom AFB
> 2010-2017 population change: -18.5% (state: +5.8%)
> Median household income: $48,787 (state: $50,801)
> Annual unemployment: 1.8% (state: 3.0%)
> Total population: 3,929
See all stories featuring: Montana
[in-text-ad]
27. Nebraska: Fairbury
> 2010-2017 population change: -6.3% (state: +0.9%)
> Median household income: $42,808 (state: $61,229)
> Annual unemployment: 3.2% (state: 4.8%)
> Total population: 3,558
See all stories featuring: Nebraska
24/7 Wall St.
28. Nevada: Hawthorne
> 2010-2017 population change: -26.1% (state: +9.7%)
> Median household income: $42,250 (state: $55,434)
> Annual unemployment: 11.4% (state: 5.1%)
> Total population: 2,689
See all stories featuring: Nevada
29. New Hampshire: Exeter
> 2010-2017 population change: -3.4% (state: +1.4%)
> Median household income: $66,412 (state: $71,305)
> Annual unemployment: 3.2% (state: 3.0%)
> Total population: 9,130
See all stories featuring: New Hampshire
[in-text-ad-2]
30. New Jersey: Leisure Village East
> 2010-2017 population change: -24.4% (state: +2.7%)
> Median household income: $43,915 (state: $76,475)
> Annual unemployment: 3.6% (state: 4.6%)
> Total population: 3,526
See all stories featuring: New Jersey
31. New Mexico: Nambe
> 2010-2017 population change: -11.4% (state: +3.6%)
> Median household income: $45,750 (state: $46,718)
> Annual unemployment: 4.1% (state: 4.5%)
> Total population: 1,876
See all stories featuring: New Mexico
[in-text-ad]
32. New York: West Point
> 2010-2017 population change: -30.8% (state: +3.0%)
> Median household income: $100,039 (state: $62,765)
> Annual unemployment: 0.5% (state: 4.3%)
> Total population: 6,536
See all stories featuring: New York
33. North Carolina: Plymouth
> 2010-2017 population change: -8.0% (state: +8.4%)
> Median household income: $18,314 (state: $50,320)
> Annual unemployment: 4.5% (state: 4.4%)
> Total population: 3,599
See all stories featuring: North Carolina
34. North Dakota: Carrington
> 2010-2017 population change: -9.5% (state: +13.0%)
> Median household income: $54,722 (state: $61,285)
> Annual unemployment: 0.1% (state: 1.9%)
> Total population: 1,923
See all stories featuring: North Dakota
[in-text-ad-2]
35. Ohio: Wheelersburg
> 2010-2017 population change: -12.9% (state: +0.8%)
> Median household income: $52,500 (state: $52,407)
> Annual unemployment: 2% (state: 4.1%)
> Total population: 6,183
See all stories featuring: Ohio
36. Oklahoma: Watonga
> 2010-2017 population change: -42.9% (state: +6.0%)
> Median household income: $51,891 (state: $49,767)
> Annual unemployment: 1.2% (state: 3.5%)
> Total population: 2,932
See all stories featuring: Oklahoma
[in-text-ad]
37. Oregon: Altamont
> 2010-2017 population change: -6.9% (state: +7.0%)
> Median household income: $41,048 (state: $56,119)
> Annual unemployment: 5% (state: 4.2%)
> Total population: 18,975
See all stories featuring: Oregon
38. Pennsylvania: West Wyomissing
> 2010-2017 population change: -18.9% (state: +1.4%)
> Median household income: $62,612 (state: $56,951)
> Annual unemployment: 2.9% (state: 4.1%)
> Total population: 3,195
See all stories featuring: Pennsylvania
39. Rhode Island: Greenville
> 2010-2017 population change: -4.3% (state: +0.0%)
> Median household income: $77,219 (state: $61,043)
> Annual unemployment: 3.6% (state: 4.4%)
> Total population: 8,388
See all stories featuring: Rhode Island
[in-text-ad-2]
40. South Carolina: Allendale
> 2010-2017 population change: -14.0% (state: +8.5%)
> Median household income: $19,420 (state: $48,781)
> Annual unemployment: 14.8% (state: 4.3%)
> Total population: 3,120
See all stories featuring: South Carolina
41. South Dakota: Fort Thompson
> 2010-2017 population change: -11.0% (state: +7.0%)
> Median household income: $25,125 (state: $54,126)
> Annual unemployment: 9.4% (state: 2.6%)
> Total population: 1,271
See all stories featuring: South Dakota
[in-text-ad]
42. Tennessee: Belle Meade
> 2010-2017 population change: -10.6% (state: +5.8%)
> Median household income: $195,000 (state: $48,708)
> Annual unemployment: 0.2% (state: 4.0%)
> Total population: 2,584
See all stories featuring: Tennessee
43. Texas: San Elizario
> 2010-2017 population change: -35.5% (state: +12.8%)
> Median household income: $26,807 (state: $57,051)
> Annual unemployment: 6.3% (state: 3.7%)
> Total population: 9,213
See all stories featuring: Texas
44. Utah: Richmond
> 2010-2017 population change: -2.3% (state: +6.4%)
> Median household income: $61,045 (state: $67,169)
> Annual unemployment: 5.7% (state: 4.8%)
> Total population: 108,853
See all stories featuring: Utah
[in-text-ad-2]
45. Vermont: St. Johnsbury
> 2010-2017 population change: -13.9% (state: +0.1%)
> Median household income: $36,958 (state: $57,808)
> Annual unemployment: 2.6% (state: 2.9%)
> Total population: 5,789
See all stories featuring: Vermont
46. Virginia: Gloucester Point
> 2010-2017 population change: -10.7% (state: +6.7%)
> Median household income: $55,600 (state: $68,766)
> Annual unemployment: 1.9% (state: 3.5%)
> Total population: 9,291
See all stories featuring: Virginia
[in-text-ad]
47. Washington: Davenport
> 2010-2017 population change: -22.4% (state: +9.5%)
> Median household income: $42,015 (state: $50,883)
> Annual unemployment: 2.4% (state: 4.2%)
> Total population: 3,665
See all stories featuring: Washington
48. West Virginia: Bethlehem
> 2010-2017 population change: -13.1% (state: -0.2%)
> Median household income: $70,288 (state: $44,061)
> Annual unemployment: 3.5% (state: 3.8%)
> Total population: 2,459
See all stories featuring: West Virginia
49. Wisconsin: Park Falls
> 2010-2017 population change: -15.2% (state: +2.2%)
> Median household income: $36,250 (state: $56,759)
> Annual unemployment: 1.7% (state: 3.1%)
> Total population: 2,294
See all stories featuring: Wisconsin
[in-text-ad-2]
50. Wyoming: Thermopolis
> 2010-2017 population change: -5.8% (state: +6.9%)
> Median household income: $50,417 (state: $60,938)
> Annual unemployment: 2.3% (state: 3.1%)
> Total population: 2,935
See all stories featuring: Wyoming
Methodology
To identify the fastest-shrinking place in every state, 24/7 Wall St. reviewed population change from 2010 to 2017 in nearly 15,000 cities, towns, villages, and Census designated places with populations of at least 1,000. We only considered places where the margin of error for population was less than 10%. All data are five-year estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey. We also reviewed data on median household income and annual unemployment for 2017 from the ACS.
Is Your Money Earning the Best Possible Rate? (Sponsor)
Let’s face it: If your money is just sitting in a checking account, you’re losing value every single day. With most checking accounts offering little to no interest, the cash you worked so hard to save is gradually being eroded by inflation.
However, by moving that money into a high-yield savings account, you can put your cash to work, growing steadily with little to no effort on your part. In just a few clicks, you can set up a high-yield savings account and start earning interest immediately.
There are plenty of reputable banks and online platforms that offer competitive rates, and many of them come with zero fees and no minimum balance requirements. Click here to see if you’re earning the best possible rate on your money!
Thank you for reading! Have some feedback for us?
Contact the 24/7 Wall St. editorial team.
Latest from 24/7
