Special Report

Cities Where People Spend the Most on Eating Out

monkeybusinessimages / Getty Images

Americans spent an average of $3,189 on food eaten away from home in 2017 (the last year for which figures are available), according to data site Statista. People aged 35 to 44 spent the most, an average of  $4,249. A CNBC report estimated last year that more than half of every dollar spent on food in this country goes to restaurants.

We not only spend a lot on food, but we also do it often. Americans eat out an average of 5.9 times a week, including both full-service and fast food restaurants, according to a 2018 survey of dining trends by the restaurant site Zagat.com.  

The advent of COVID-19 has almost certainly changed the equation dramatically. Many thousands of restaurants nationwide have already closed their doors, either voluntarily or in response to local or state government mandates. Some have shuttered completely, while many more continue to provide takeout and/or delivery service, where permitted under the new rules. This is a list of all the states with mandated bar and restaurant closings.

 When the dust settles and the coronavirus has been vanquished, it seems likely that many eating places, on every level, will be gone for good. There is no reason to think, however, that overall spending patterns will have changed substantially.

 To learn which communities spent the most money per capita on dining out in 2017, 24/7 Tempo compiled statistics focusing on full-service restaurant spending in some 293 towns and metropolitan areas around the country. Of the 30 cities listed here, 20 of them are west of the Mississippi, and the majority of them are wealthy municipalities known as tourist destination or resort communities. Sometimes unexpected places turn out to be among the U.S. cities with the most underrated food scenes.

Click here to see the cities where people spend the most on dining out.

The 10 biggest overall restaurant spending per capita were in places with comparatively small populations, none of them exceeding 100,000 people. The most populous entry by far is California’s San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward area, which far outpaces all the rest with some 4,673,221 people — and it’s No. 27 on the list.

To determine the cities where people spent the most money per capita on dining out at the time of this survey, 24/7 Tempo created an index based on the number of full-service restaurants and the full-service restaurant spending per capita across 293 urban areas of at least 10,000 people. Only full-service restaurants were considered, meaning those that generally offer table service from a wait staff, serving food and beverages for consumption on-premises. Limited-service restaurants — establishments in which patrons select and pay for items before eating, including fast-food chains and counter-service independents — were not considered.

miroslav_1 / Getty Images

30. Kalispell, Montana
> Population: 98,082
> Total amount spent dining out in 2017: $122,856,000
> Per capita amount spent dining out in 2017: $1,253
> Full-service restaurants: 125

[in-text-ad]

russokm1105 / Getty Images

29. San Luis Obispo-Paso Robles-Arroyo Grande, California
> Population: 281,455
> Total amount spent dining out in 2017: $382,164,000
> Per capita amount spent dining out in 2017: $1,358
> Full-service restaurants: 351

milehightraveler / Getty Images

28. Boulder, Colorado
> Population: 321,030
> Total amount spent dining out in 2017: $517,441,000
> Per capita amount spent dining out in 2017: $1,612
> Full-service restaurants: 356

Nicolas McComber / Getty Images

27. San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, California
> Population: 4,673,221
> Total amount spent dining out in 2017: $7,329,460,000
> Per capita amount spent dining out in 2017: $1,568
> Full-service restaurants: 5372

[in-text-ad-2]

voshadhi / Getty Images

26. Hood River, Oregon
> Population: 23,131
> Total amount spent dining out in 2017: $27,152,000
> Per capita amount spent dining out in 2017: $1,174
> Full-service restaurants: 35

Sean Pavone / Getty Images

25. Portland-South Portland, Maine
> Population: 529,323
> Total amount spent dining out in 2017: $734,607,000
> Per capita amount spent dining out in 2017: $1,388
> Full-service restaurants: 716

[in-text-ad]

DenisTangneyJr / Getty Images

24. Atlantic City-Hammonton, New Jersey
> Population: 268,539
> Total amount spent dining out in 2017: $434,466,000
> Per capita amount spent dining out in 2017: $1,618
> Full-service restaurants: 329

DenisTangneyJr / Getty Images

23. Laconia, New Hampshire
> Population: 60,640
> Total amount spent dining out in 2017: $87,437,000
> Per capita amount spent dining out in 2017: $1,442
> Full-service restaurants: 86

DenisTangneyJr / Getty Images

22. Pittsfield, Massachusetts
> Population: 127,328
> Total amount spent dining out in 2017: $146,085,000
> Per capita amount spent dining out in 2017: $1,147
> Full-service restaurants: 213

[in-text-ad-2]

miroslav_1 / Getty Images

21. Flagstaff, Arizona
> Population: 140,217
> Total amount spent dining out in 2017: $241,002,000
> Per capita amount spent dining out in 2017: $1,719
> Full-service restaurants: 177

20. Brookings, Oregon
> Population: 22,507
> Total amount spent dining out in 2017: $20,834,000
> Per capita amount spent dining out in 2017: $926
> Full-service restaurants: 42

[in-text-ad]

Tim Evanson / Wikimedia Commons

19. Bozeman, Montana
> Population: 104,729
> Total amount spent dining out in 2017: $172,055,000
> Per capita amount spent dining out in 2017: $1,643
> Full-service restaurants: 139

18. Easton, Maryland
> Population: 37,211
> Total amount spent dining out in 2017: $57,299,000
> Per capita amount spent dining out in 2017: $1,540
> Full-service restaurants: 55

latypova / Getty Images

17. Napa, California
> Population: 140,530
> Total amount spent dining out in 2017: $318,389,000
> Per capita amount spent dining out in 2017: $2,266
> Full-service restaurants: 149

[in-text-ad-2]

Eric Fischer / Wikimedia Commons

16. Salisbury, Maryland
> Population: 399,013
> Total amount spent dining out in 2017: $756,157,000
> Per capita amount spent dining out in 2017: $1,895
> Full-service restaurants: 563

mariusz_prusaczyk / Getty Images

15. Kapaa, Hawaii
> Population: 71,377
> Total amount spent dining out in 2017: $187,156,000
> Per capita amount spent dining out in 2017: $2,622
> Full-service restaurants: 94

[in-text-ad]

unclegene / Getty Images

14. Kahului-Wailuku-Lahaina, Hawaii
> Population: 165,356
> Total amount spent dining out in 2017: $506,543,000
> Per capita amount spent dining out in 2017: $3,063
> Full-service restaurants: 183

shanecotee / Getty Images

13. Hailey, Idaho
> Population: 28,201
> Total amount spent dining out in 2017: $48,254,000
> Per capita amount spent dining out in 2017: $1,711
> Full-service restaurants: 65

12. Glenwood Springs, Colorado
> Population: 76,447
> Total amount spent dining out in 2017: $195,972,000
> Per capita amount spent dining out in 2017: $2,564
> Full-service restaurants: 149

[in-text-ad-2]

Jon Bilous / Shutterstock.com

11. Barnstable Town, Massachusetts
> Population: 213,690
> Total amount spent dining out in 2017: $542,931,000
> Per capita amount spent dining out in 2017: $2,541
> Full-service restaurants: 433

raywhittemore / Getty Images

10. Newport, Oregon
> Population: 47,881
> Total amount spent dining out in 2017: $103,678,000
> Per capita amount spent dining out in 2017: $2,165
> Full-service restaurants: 112

[in-text-ad]

benedek / Getty Images

9. Jackson, Wyoming
> Population: 34,139
> Total amount spent dining out in 2017: $107,187,000
> Per capita amount spent dining out in 2017: $3,140
> Full-service restaurants: 85

seanfboggs / Getty Images

8. Edwards, Colorado
> Population: 54,357
> Total amount spent dining out in 2017: $182,315,000
> Per capita amount spent dining out in 2017: $3,354
> Full-service restaurants: 128

PhusePhoto / Getty Images

7. Astoria, Oregon
> Population: 38,562
> Total amount spent dining out in 2017: $110,192,000
> Per capita amount spent dining out in 2017: $2,858
> Full-service restaurants: 112

[in-text-ad-2]

THEPALMER / Getty Images

6. Summit Park, Utah
> Population: 40,511
> Total amount spent dining out in 2017: $156,123,000
> Per capita amount spent dining out in 2017: $3,854
> Full-service restaurants: 93

5. Steamboat Springs, Colorado
> Population: 24,874
> Total amount spent dining out in 2017: $76,728,000
> Per capita amount spent dining out in 2017: $3,085
> Full-service restaurants: 74

[in-text-ad]

Aneese / Getty Images

4. Ocean City, New Jersey
> Population: 93,705
> Total amount spent dining out in 2017: $311,948,000
> Per capita amount spent dining out in 2017: $3,329
> Full-service restaurants: 322

Joesboy / Getty Images

3. Kill Devil Hills, North Carolina
> Population: 39,860
> Total amount spent dining out in 2017: $169,240,000
> Per capita amount spent dining out in 2017: $4,246
> Full-service restaurants: 126

Jorge Moro / Getty Images

2. Vineyard Haven, Massachusetts
> Population: 17,313
> Total amount spent dining out in 2017: $87,055,000
> Per capita amount spent dining out in 2017: $5,028
> Full-service restaurants: 62

[in-text-ad-2]

Adventure_Photo / Getty Images

1. Breckenridge, Colorado
> Population: 30,429
> Total amount spent dining out in 2017: $164,369,000
> Per capita amount spent dining out in 2017: $5,402
> Full-service restaurants: 128

Essential Tips for Investing (Sponsored)

A financial advisor can help you understand the advantages and disadvantages of investment properties. Finding a qualified financial advisor doesn’t have to be hard. SmartAsset’s free tool matches you with up to three financial advisors who serve your area, and you can interview your advisor matches at no cost to decide which one is right for you. If you’re ready to find an advisor who can help you achieve your financial goals, get started now.

Investing in real estate can diversify your portfolio. But expanding your horizons may add additional costs. If you’re an investor looking to minimize expenses, consider checking out online brokerages. They often offer low investment fees, helping you maximize your profit.

Thank you for reading! Have some feedback for us?
Contact the 24/7 Wall St. editorial team.