Americans are less likely to move today than at any point in recent history. Over the 12 months ending in March 2019, the share of Americans who moved to a new home dipped below 10% for the first time since the U.S. Census Bureau began keeping track in 1947.
Still, an average of 35 million Americans have moved every year since 2010 — and in some cities, people are leaving much faster than they are arriving. To determine the cities Americans are abandoning in every state, 24/7 Wall St. used data from the Census Bureau’s Population Estimates Program and identified the metro area with the largest net-migration decline from April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2018 in every state.
Net migration is the difference between the number of new residents — either from other parts of the country or from abroad — and the number of residents who have moved elsewhere. It is not a measure of total population change, which is also a product of births and deaths.
It is important to note that four states — Delaware, New Hampshire. Rhode Island, and Vermont — have only one metropolitan area each, and each case reported a net migration increase. Additionally, Colorado, Florida, Nevada, Oregon, South Dakota, and Wyoming have no metro areas with a net migration decline between 2010 and 2018 .
Some of the most commonly cited reasons for packing up and moving to a new city are related to employment. Last year, more than one in every five moves were prompted by work-related reasons. In many of the cities Americans are abandoning, job availability is relatively low, as most have unemployment rates as high or higher than the 3.6% national rate. Here is a look at the hardest states to find full-time work.
Click here to see the cities Americans are abandoning in every state
Click here to see the cities Americans are flocking to in every state
1. Alabama: Montgomery
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: -12,144 (-3.2%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: -1,316 (-0.4%)
> 2018 population: 373,225
> Median household income: $51,943
> January 2020 unemployment: 2.7%
[in-text-ad]
2. Alaska: Fairbanks
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: -8,736 (-9.0%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +1,386 (+1.4%)
> 2018 population: 98,971
> Median household income: $75,448
> January 2020 unemployment: 5.3%
3. Arizona: Sierra Vista-Douglas
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: -7,484 (-5.7%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: -4,587 (-3.5%)
> 2018 population: 126,770
> Median household income: $50,495
> January 2020 unemployment: 5.5%
4. Arkansas: Pine Bluff
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: -11,360 (-11.3%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: -10,775 (-10.7%)
> 2018 population: 89,515
> Median household income: $37,314
> January 2020 unemployment: 5.3%
[in-text-ad-2]
5. California: Hanford-Corcoran
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: -14,567 (-9.5%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: -1,616 (-1.1%)
> 2018 population: 151,366
> Median household income: $61,663
> January 2020 unemployment: 7.6%
6. Colorado: None
[in-text-ad]
7. Connecticut: Norwich-New London
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: -9,732 (-3.6%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: -7,284 (-2.7%)
> 2018 population: 266,784
> Median household income: $67,197
> January 2020 unemployment: 3.6%
24/7 Wall St.
8. Delaware: None
9. Florida: None
[in-text-ad-2]
10. Georgia: Hinesville
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: -8,248 (-10.6%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +2,576 (+3.3%)
> 2018 population: 80,495
> Median household income: $47,234
> January 2020 unemployment: 3.5%
11. Hawaii: Urban Honolulu
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: -19,098 (-2.0%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +26,874 (+2.8%)
> 2018 population: 980,080
> Median household income: $84,423
> January 2020 unemployment: 2.5%
[in-text-ad]
12. Idaho: Pocatello
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: -647 (-0.8%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +4,296 (+5.2%)
> 2018 population: 87,138
> Median household income: $50,748
> January 2020 unemployment: 2.7%
13. Illinois: Danville
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: -5,455 (-6.7%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: -4,819 (-5.9%)
> 2018 population: 76,806
> Median household income: $43,655
> January 2020 unemployment: 4.9%
14. Indiana: Muncie
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: -2,889 (-2.5%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: -2,892 (-2.5%)
> 2018 population: 114,772
> Median household income: $41,662
> January 2020 unemployment: 3.8%
[in-text-ad-2]
15. Iowa: Sioux City
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: -6,978 (-4.1%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +482 (+0.3%)
> 2018 population: 169,045
> Median household income: $61,576
> January 2020 unemployment: 2.8%
16. Kansas: Manhattan
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: -2,405 (-2.6%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +5,240 (+5.7%)
> 2018 population: 97,980
> Median household income: $49,200
> January 2020 unemployment: 2.8%
[in-text-ad]
17. Kentucky: Elizabethtown-Fort Knox
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: -811 (-0.5%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +5,038 (+3.4%)
> 2018 population: 153,378
> Median household income: $51,147
> January 2020 unemployment: 4.2%
24/7 Wall St.
18. Louisiana: Shreveport-Bossier City
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: -17,484 (-4.0%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: -3,470 (-0.8%)
> 2018 population: 436,341
> Median household income: $41,969
> January 2020 unemployment: 5.5%
19. Maine: Lewiston-Auburn
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: -1,753 (-1.6%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: -31 (-0.0%)
> 2018 population: 107,679
> Median household income: $49,697
> January 2020 unemployment: 2.9%
[in-text-ad-2]
20. Maryland: Cumberland
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: -2,899 (-2.8%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: -5,330 (-5.2%)
> 2018 population: 97,915
> Median household income: $44,607
> January 2020 unemployment: 5.3%
21. Massachusetts: Pittsfield
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: -1,606 (-1.2%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: -4,927 (-3.8%)
> 2018 population: 126,348
> Median household income: $60,476
> January 2020 unemployment: 3.5%
[in-text-ad]
22. Michigan: Flint
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: -23,255 (-5.5%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: -18,897 (-4.4%)
> 2018 population: 406,892
> Median household income: $48,127
> January 2020 unemployment: 4.7%
23. Minnesota: Duluth
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: -450 (-0.2%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: -977 (-0.3%)
> 2018 population: 278,799
> Median household income: $53,767
> January 2020 unemployment: 4.3%
24. Mississippi: Jackson
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: -6,810 (-1.2%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +12,534 (+2.2%)
> 2018 population: 580,166
> Median household income: $55,700
> January 2020 unemployment: 4.8%
[in-text-ad-2]
25. Missouri: St. Joseph
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: -2,781 (-2.2%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: -837 (-0.7%)
> 2018 population: 126,490
> Median household income: $53,321
> January 2020 unemployment: 3.1%
26. Montana: Great Falls
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: -2,252 (-2.8%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +320 (+0.4%)
> 2018 population: 81,643
> Median household income: $49,948
> January 2020 unemployment: 3.3%
[in-text-ad]
27. Nebraska: Grand Island
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: -502 (-0.6%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +3,238 (+4.0%)
> 2018 population: 85,088
> Median household income: $54,235
> January 2020 unemployment: 3.5%
24/7 Wall St.
28. Nevada: None
29. New Hampshire: None
[in-text-ad-2]
30. New Jersey: Vineland-Bridgeton
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: -10,118 (-6.5%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: -5,661 (-3.6%)
> 2018 population: 150,972
> Median household income: $52,795
> January 2020 unemployment: 5.7%
31. New Mexico: Farmington
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: -11,873 (-9.1%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: -5,002 (-3.8%)
> 2018 population: 125,043
> Median household income: $44,841
> January 2020 unemployment: 5.7%
[in-text-ad]
32. New York: Watertown-Fort Drum
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: -14,329 (-12.3%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: -4,479 (-3.9%)
> 2018 population: 111,755
> Median household income: $53,146
> January 2020 unemployment: 5.8%
33. North Carolina: Rocky Mount
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: -7,021 (-4.6%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: -6,354 (-4.2%)
> 2018 population: 146,021
> Median household income: $46,733
> January 2020 unemployment: 5.0%
34. North Dakota: Grand Forks
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: -1,071 (-1.1%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +3,835 (+3.9%)
> 2018 population: 102,299
> Median household income: $54,659
> January 2020 unemployment: 2.6%
[in-text-ad-2]
35. Ohio: Lima
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: -5,125 (-4.8%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: -3,652 (-3.4%)
> 2018 population: 102,663
> Median household income: $49,063
> January 2020 unemployment: 4.2%
36. Oklahoma: Lawton
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: -11,422 (-8.8%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: -4,090 (-3.1%)
> 2018 population: 126,198
> Median household income: $52,034
> January 2020 unemployment: 3.5%
[in-text-ad]
37. Oregon: None
24/7 Wall St.
38. Pennsylvania: Johnstown
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: -7,980 (-5.6%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: -11,951 (-8.3%)
> 2018 population: 131,730
> Median household income: $45,084
> January 2020 unemployment: 5.6%
39. Rhode Island: None
[in-text-ad-2]
40. South Carolina: Sumter
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: -4,323 (-4.0%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: -978 (-0.9%)
> 2018 population: 106,512
> Median household income: $45,994
> January 2020 unemployment: 2.9%
41. South Dakota: None
[in-text-ad]
42. Tennessee: Memphis
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: -32,900 (-2.5%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +25,791 (+1.9%)
> 2018 population: 1.4 million
> Median household income: $50,338
> January 2020 unemployment: 4.1%
43. Texas: Brownsville-Harlingen
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: -20,487 (-5.0%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +17,693 (+4.4%)
> 2018 population: 423,908
> Median household income: $38,378
> January 2020 unemployment: 5.6%
44. Utah: Logan
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: -680 (-0.5%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +15,352 (+12.2%)
> 2018 population: 140,794
> Median household income: $59,414
> January 2020 unemployment: 1.9%
[in-text-ad-2]
45. Vermont: None
46. Virginia: Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: -20,469 (-1.2%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +51,910 (+3.1%)
> 2018 population: 1.7 million
> Median household income: $65,604
> January 2020 unemployment: 2.9%
[in-text-ad]
47. Washington: Yakima
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: -9,471 (-3.9%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +8,206 (+3.4%)
> 2018 population: 251,446
> Median household income: $51,555
> January 2020 unemployment: 6.8%
24/7 Wall St.
48. West Virginia: Charleston
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: -12,194 (-5.4%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: -16,023 (-7.1%)
> 2018 population: 211,037
> Median household income: $40,806
> January 2020 unemployment: 5.0%
49. Wisconsin: Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: -33,585 (-2.2%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +20,159 (+1.3%)
> 2018 population: 1.6 million
> Median household income: $60,643
> January 2020 unemployment: 3.7%
[in-text-ad-2]
50. Wyoming: None
Is Your Money Earning the Best Possible Rate? (Sponsor)
Let’s face it: If your money is just sitting in a checking account, you’re losing value every single day. With most checking accounts offering little to no interest, the cash you worked so hard to save is gradually being eroded by inflation.
However, by moving that money into a high-yield savings account, you can put your cash to work, growing steadily with little to no effort on your part. In just a few clicks, you can set up a high-yield savings account and start earning interest immediately.
There are plenty of reputable banks and online platforms that offer competitive rates, and many of them come with zero fees and no minimum balance requirements. Click here to see if you’re earning the best possible rate on your money!
Thank you for reading! Have some feedback for us?
Contact the 24/7 Wall St. editorial team.