Americans are less likely to move today than at any point in recent history. Over the 12 months ending in March 2019, the share of Americans who moved to a new home dipped below 10% for the first time since the U.S. Census Bureau began keeping track in 1947.
Indeed, in the majority of U.S. metropolitan areas, the greatest driver of population growth is natural increase — the number of births over a given period less the number of deaths. Still, an average of 35 million Americans have moved every year since 2010 — and some destinations are demonstrably more popular than others.
To determine the cities Americans flocking to in every state, 24/7 Wall St. used data from the Census Bureau’s Population Estimates Program and identified the metro area with the largest net-migration increase from April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2018 in every state.
Net migration is the difference between the number of new residents — either from other parts of the country or from abroad — and the number of residents who have moved elsewhere. It is not a measure of total population change, which also includes natural growth.
It is important to note that four states — Delaware, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont — have only one metropolitan area each. As a result, these cities rank on this list by default. Additionally, in Alaska, Connecticut, Illinois, and New Jersey, every metro area reported negative net migration.
Some of the most commonly cited reasons for packing up and moving to a new city are related to employment. Last year, more than one in every five moves were prompted by work-related reasons. In the cities Americans are flocking to, job markets appear generally strong as in most of them, unemployment rates are as low or lower than the 3.6% national unemployment rate. Here is a look at the cities that have added the most jobs in the last five years.
Click here to see the cities Americans are flocking to in every state
Click here to see the cities Americans are abandoning in every state
1. Alabama: Daphne-Fairhope-Foley
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: +33,655 (+18.5%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +35,758 (+19.6%)
> 2018 population: 218,022
> Median household income: $56,813
> January 2020 unemployment: 2.4%
[in-text-ad]
2. Alaska: None
3. Arizona: Prescott
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: +28,757 (+13.6%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +20,979 (+9.9%)
> 2018 population: 231,993
> Median household income: $48,148
> January 2020 unemployment: 4.2%
4. Arkansas: Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: +55,068 (+11.9%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +85,926 (+18.6%)
> 2018 population: 549,128
> Median household income: $57,911
> January 2020 unemployment: 2.5%
[in-text-ad-2]
5. California: Sacramento–Roseville–Arden-Arcade
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: +109,665 (+5.1%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +196,059 (+9.1%)
> 2018 population: 2.3 million
> Median household income: $73,142
> January 2020 unemployment: 3.4%
6. Colorado: Greeley
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: +41,180 (+16.3%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +61,458 (+24.3%)
> 2018 population: 314,305
> Median household income: $75,938
> January 2020 unemployment: 2.4%
[in-text-ad]
7. Connecticut: None
24/7 Wall St.
8. Delaware: Dover
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: +10,595 (+6.5%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +16,201 (+10.0%)
> 2018 population: 178,550
> Median household income: $54,419
> January 2020 unemployment: 4.3%
9. Florida: The Villages
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: +43,639 (+46.7%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +35,334 (+37.8%)
> 2018 population: 128,754
> Median household income: $53,895
> January 2020 unemployment: 4.2%
[in-text-ad-2]
10. Georgia: Gainesville
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: +12,744 (+7.1%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +22,422 (+12.5%)
> 2018 population: 202,148
> Median household income: $61,699
> January 2020 unemployment: 2.4%
11. Hawaii: Kahului-Wailuku-Lahaina
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: +5,840 (+3.8%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +12,365 (+8.0%)
> 2018 population: 167,295
> Median household income: $82,917
> January 2020 unemployment: 2.6%
[in-text-ad]
12. Idaho: Coeur d’Alene
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: +19,111 (+13.8%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +23,039 (+16.6%)
> 2018 population: 161,505
> Median household income: $55,236
> January 2020 unemployment: 3.5%
24/7 Wall St.
13. Illinois: None
14. Indiana: Lafayette-West Lafayette
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: +10,197 (+5.1%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +20,034 (+9.9%)
> 2018 population: 221,828
> Median household income: $50,799
> January 2020 unemployment: 2.9%
[in-text-ad-2]
15. Iowa: Des Moines-West Des Moines
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: +49,051 (+8.6%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +85,777 (+15.1%)
> 2018 population: 655,409
> Median household income: $71,352
> January 2020 unemployment: 2.6%
16. Kansas: Lawrence
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: +5,987 (+5.4%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +10,610 (+9.6%)
> 2018 population: 121,436
> Median household income: $54,668
> January 2020 unemployment: 2.9%
[in-text-ad]
17. Kentucky: Bowling Green
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: +13,518 (+8.5%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +18,824 (+11.9%)
> 2018 population: 177,432
> Median household income: $51,365
> January 2020 unemployment: 4.0%
18. Louisiana: Hammond
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: +6,704 (+5.5%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +12,670 (+10.5%)
> 2018 population: 133,777
> Median household income: $48,205
> January 2020 unemployment: 5.7%
19. Maine: Portland-South Portland
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: +20,096 (+3.9%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +21,316 (+4.1%)
> 2018 population: 535,420
> Median household income: $69,980
> January 2020 unemployment: 2.4%
[in-text-ad-2]
20. Maryland: Salisbury
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: +35,981 (+9.6%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +36,219 (+9.7%)
> 2018 population: 409,979
> Median household income: $59,214
> January 2020 unemployment: 4.5%
21. Massachusetts: Boston-Cambridge-Newton
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: +197,049 (+4.3%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +322,792 (+7.1%)
> 2018 population: 4.9 million
> Median household income: $88,711
> January 2020 unemployment: 2.6%
[in-text-ad]
22. Michigan: Ann Arbor
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: +13,480 (+3.9%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +25,859 (+7.5%)
> 2018 population: 370,963
> Median household income: $71,860
> January 2020 unemployment: 2.7%
23. Minnesota: Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: +92,289 (+2.8%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +280,328 (+8.4%)
> 2018 population: 3.6 million
> Median household income: $79,578
> January 2020 unemployment: 3.0%
24. Mississippi: Gulfport-Biloxi-Pascagoula
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: +16,855 (+4.5%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +26,474 (+7.1%)
> 2018 population: 397,261
> Median household income: $47,444
> January 2020 unemployment: 5.5%
[in-text-ad-2]
25. Missouri: Columbia
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: +8,607 (+5.3%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +17,360 (+10.7%)
> 2018 population: 180,005
> Median household income: $54,356
> January 2020 unemployment: 2.5%
26. Montana: Missoula
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: +6,448 (+5.9%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +9,495 (+8.7%)
> 2018 population: 118,791
> Median household income: $56,598
> January 2020 unemployment: 3.1%
[in-text-ad]
27. Nebraska: Lincoln
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: +15,816 (+5.2%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +32,433 (+10.7%)
> 2018 population: 334,590
> Median household income: $58,506
> January 2020 unemployment: 2.8%
28. Nevada: Las Vegas-Henderson-Paradise
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: +183,271 (+9.4%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +280,376 (+14.4%)
> 2018 population: 2.2 million
> Median household income: $57,076
> January 2020 unemployment: 3.9%
29. New Hampshire: Manchester-Nashua
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: +5,493 (+1.4%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +14,548 (+3.6%)
> 2018 population: 415,247
> Median household income: $78,978
> January 2020 unemployment: 2.4%
[in-text-ad-2]
30. New Jersey: None
31. New Mexico: Santa Fe
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: +4,218 (+2.9%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +5,829 (+4.0%)
> 2018 population: 150,056
> Median household income: $60,193
> January 2020 unemployment: 3.8%
[in-text-ad]
32. New York: Albany-Schenectady-Troy
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: +2,350 (+0.3%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +12,455 (+1.4%)
> 2018 population: 883,169
> Median household income: $71,301
> January 2020 unemployment: 3.6%
33. North Carolina: Raleigh
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: +159,756 (+14.1%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +232,052 (+20.5%)
> 2018 population: 1.4 million
> Median household income: $75,165
> January 2020 unemployment: 3.2%
34. North Dakota: Fargo
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: +21,211 (+10.2%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +36,694 (+17.6%)
> 2018 population: 245,471
> Median household income: $65,073
> January 2020 unemployment: 2.2%
[in-text-ad-2]
35. Ohio: Columbus
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: +106,381 (+5.6%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +204,534 (+10.8%)
> 2018 population: 2.1 million
> Median household income: $64,052
> January 2020 unemployment: 3.7%
36. Oklahoma: Oklahoma City
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: +81,389 (+6.5%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +143,455 (+11.4%)
> 2018 population: 1.4 million
> Median household income: $57,485
> January 2020 unemployment: 3.0%
[in-text-ad]
37. Oregon: Bend-Redmond
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: +30,773 (+19.5%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +34,266 (+21.7%)
> 2018 population: 191,996
> Median household income: $67,577
> January 2020 unemployment: 3.6%
38. Pennsylvania: Lebanon
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: +6,292 (+4.7%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +7,737 (+5.8%)
> 2018 population: 141,314
> Median household income: $61,362
> January 2020 unemployment: 4.1%
39. Rhode Island: Providence-Warwick
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: +7,768 (+0.5%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +20,126 (+1.3%)
> 2018 population: 1.6 million
> Median household income: $65,083
> January 2020 unemployment: 3.4%
[in-text-ad-2]
40. South Carolina: Myrtle Beach-Conway-North Myrtle Beach
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: +105,460 (+28.0%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +104,336 (+27.7%)
> 2018 population: 480,891
> Median household income: $51,580
> January 2020 unemployment: 3.2%
41. South Dakota: Sioux Falls
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: +19,823 (+8.7%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +37,391 (+16.4%)
> 2018 population: 265,653
> Median household income: $61,196
> January 2020 unemployment: 2.7%
[in-text-ad]
42. Tennessee: Nashville-Davidson–Murfreesboro–Franklin
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: +178,958 (+10.7%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +260,085 (+15.6%)
> 2018 population: 1.9 million
> Median household income: $65,919
> January 2020 unemployment: 2.6%
24/7 Wall St.
43. Texas: Austin-Round Rock
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: +310,931 (+18.1%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +451,995 (+26.3%)
> 2018 population: 2.2 million
> Median household income: $76,925
> January 2020 unemployment: 2.6%
44. Utah: St. George
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: +24,835 (+18.0%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +33,585 (+24.3%)
> 2018 population: 171,700
> Median household income: $56,333
> January 2020 unemployment: 2.7%
[in-text-ad-2]
45. Vermont: Burlington-South Burlington
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: +4,605 (+2.2%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +9,821 (+4.6%)
> 2018 population: 221,083
> Median household income: $71,452
> January 2020 unemployment: 1.8%
46. Virginia: Winchester
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: +8,171 (+6.4%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +11,335 (+8.8%)
> 2018 population: 139,810
> Median household income: $65,170
> January 2020 unemployment: 2.5%
[in-text-ad]
47. Washington: Olympia-Tumwater
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: +25,634 (+10.2%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +34,159 (+13.5%)
> 2018 population: 286,419
> Median household income: $72,703
> January 2020 unemployment: 4.8%
48. West Virginia: Morgantown
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: +7,237 (+5.6%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +10,549 (+8.1%)
> 2018 population: 140,259
> Median household income: $50,574
> January 2020 unemployment: 3.8%
49. Wisconsin: Madison
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: +29,185 (+4.8%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +54,973 (+9.1%)
> 2018 population: 660,422
> Median household income: $70,463
> January 2020 unemployment: 2.6%
[in-text-ad-2]
50. Wyoming: Cheyenne
> Population change due to migration, 2010-2018: +3,019 (+3.3%)
> Overall population change, 2010-2018: +7,091 (+7.7%)
> 2018 population: 98,976
> Median household income: $64,306
> January 2020 unemployment: 3.4%
Get Ready To Retire (Sponsored)
Start by taking a quick retirement quiz from SmartAsset that will match you with up to 3 financial advisors that serve your area and beyond in 5 minutes, or less.
Each advisor has been vetted by SmartAsset and is held to a fiduciary standard to act in your best interests.
Here’s how it works:
1. Answer SmartAsset advisor match quiz
2. Review your pre-screened matches at your leisure. Check out the advisors’ profiles.
3. Speak with advisors at no cost to you. Have an introductory call on the phone or introduction in person and choose whom to work with in the future
Get started right here.
Thank you for reading! Have some feedback for us?
Contact the 24/7 Wall St. editorial team.