Special Report
The City With the Worst Health Insurance Coverage in Every State
Published:
Last Updated:
Nearly half of all Americans with health insurance receive coverage through their employer. When the COVID-19 pandemic hit, however, millions of Americans lost their jobs, and nearly 30% of U.S. residents lost their health insurance coverage. While many have returned to employment, health insurance coverage levels are likely still far from the pre-pandemic normal.
It remains to be seen how much of an impact the pandemic has truly had on health coverage in the United States, but there are a number of American cities where even a small loss of insurance coverage would have driven already low coverage levels even lower, certainly below the national figure.
According to the five-year average through 2019, the most recent year for which data is available through the U.S. Census, 10.3% of Americans did not have health insurance coverage. In many American cities, the uninsured rate was far greater, and a number of cities had more than double the uninsured share.
To determine the cities with the worst health insurance coverage in every state, 24/7 Wall St. reviewed five-year estimates of the percentage of the noninstitutionalized civilian population under 65 without health insurance from the U.S. Census Bureau’s 2019 American Community Survey. We looked at the population under 65 because Americans 65 and older are automatically entitled to Medicare benefits. It should be noted that Burlington is the only city in Vermont that meets the population requirements and therefore is the least insured city in the state by default, despite having a relatively highly-insured population.
Health insurance coverage varies substantially from state to state. While, as might be expected, the city in each state with the worst health insurance coverage generally has worse coverage than the national average, there are seven states, not counting Vermont, where in the city with the worst coverage fewer than 10.3% of residents lack health insurance coverage.
Among the other cities to make this list, generally it is the case that in states with worse insurance coverage of the under 65 population, the city to make this list has especially poor health insurance coverage. Texas has the highest uninsured rate in the country, at 19.4% of the population under 65. The city of San Juan in Texas has the third highest uninsured rate of any place to qualify for this ranking, at 37.2%.
Click here to see the city with the worst health insurance coverage in every state.
Click here to see our methodology.
Alabama: Gadsden
> Adults under 65, no health insurance: 19.0% (Alabama: 11.3%)
> Adults under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 8.5% (Alabama: 4.9%)
> Adults under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 29.8% (Alabama: 20.9%)
> Adults under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 1.8% (Alabama: 1.7%)
> Adults under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 41.9% (Alabama: 57.8%)
> Adults under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 9.8% (Alabama: 10.5%)
> Adults under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 1.8% (Alabama: 3.3%)
[in-text-ad]
Alaska: Anchorage
> Adults under 65, no health insurance: 12.4% (Alaska: 15.3%)
> Adults under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 1.9% (Alaska: 1.9%)
> Adults under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 18.5% (Alaska: 21.1%)
> Adults under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 4.0% (Alaska: 3.0%)
> Adults under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 58.6% (Alaska: 54.4%)
> Adults under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 7.4% (Alaska: 6.9%)
> Adults under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 11.4% (Alaska: 9.6%)
Arizona: San Luis
> Adults under 65, no health insurance: 21.1% (Arizona: 12.4%)
> Adults under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 1.2% (Arizona: 2.6%)
> Adults under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 46.7% (Arizona: 24.1%)
> Adults under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 0.0% reported (Arizona: 1.5%)
> Adults under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 32.1% (Arizona: 55.1%)
> Adults under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 3.4% (Arizona: 9.7%)
> Adults under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 0.5% (Arizona: 2.4%)
Arkansas: Springdale
> Adults under 65, no health insurance: 19.4% (Arkansas: 10.1%)
> Adults under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 2.7% (Arkansas: 5.1%)
> Adults under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 25.1% (Arkansas: 28.6%)
> Adults under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 1.2% (Arkansas: 1.8%)
> Adults under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 51.3% (Arkansas: 51.8%)
> Adults under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 6.4% (Arkansas: 10.2%)
> Adults under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 1.0% (Arkansas: 2.3%)
[in-text-ad-2]
California: Santa Maria
> Adults under 65, no health insurance: 20.0% (California: 8.6%)
> Adults under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 2.1% (California: 2.2%)
> Adults under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 39.1% (California: 27.1%)
> Adults under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 0.6% (California: 0.9%)
> Adults under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 37.1% (California: 55.7%)
> Adults under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 5.7% (California: 10.9%)
> Adults under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 0.9% (California: 1.4%)
Colorado: Aurora
> Adults under 65, no health insurance: 12.5% (Colorado: 8.7%)
> Adults under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 2.0% (Colorado: 2.1%)
> Adults under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 23.9% (Colorado: 19.8%)
> Adults under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 1.5% (Colorado: 1.5%)
> Adults under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 56.5% (Colorado: 60.5%)
> Adults under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 7.4% (Colorado: 11.4%)
> Adults under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 3.5% (Colorado: 3.5%)
[in-text-ad]
Connecticut: Norwalk
> Adults under 65, no health insurance: 19.4% (Connecticut: 6.3%)
> Adults under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 1.9% (Connecticut: 2.4%)
> Adults under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 17.9% (Connecticut: 21.6%)
> Adults under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 0.3% (Connecticut: 0.7%)
> Adults under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 54.0% (Connecticut: 65.1%)
> Adults under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 10.3% (Connecticut: 9.4%)
> Adults under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 0.2% (Connecticut: 1.0%)
Delaware: Wilmington
> Adults under 65, no health insurance: 7.1% (Delaware: 6.8%)
> Adults under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 5.0% (Delaware: 3.3%)
> Adults under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 39.5% (Delaware: 22.5%)
> Adults under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 0.9% (Delaware: 1.0%)
> Adults under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 51.2% (Delaware: 64.4%)
> Adults under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 6.7% (Delaware: 8.6%)
> Adults under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 1.2% (Delaware: 2.6%)
Florida: Golden Gate
> Adults under 65, no health insurance: 38.3% (Florida: 15.7%)
> Adults under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 1.9% (Florida: 3.1%)
> Adults under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 23.4% (Florida: 19.2%)
> Adults under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 0.4% (Florida: 1.6%)
> Adults under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 27.8% (Florida: 50.6%)
> Adults under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 10.9% (Florida: 14.5%)
> Adults under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 0.2% (Florida: 2.7%)
[in-text-ad-2]
Georgia: Chamblee
> Adults under 65, no health insurance: 30.0% (Georgia: 15.2%)
> Adults under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 1.3% (Georgia: 3.0%)
> Adults under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 16.8% (Georgia: 17.9%)
> Adults under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 0.4% (Georgia: 1.5%)
> Adults under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 44.3% (Georgia: 56.9%)
> Adults under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 9.3% (Georgia: 10.2%)
> Adults under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 0.7% (Georgia: 3.4%)
Hawaii: Kailua (Honolulu County)
> Adults under 65, no health insurance: 5.0% (Hawaii: 4.6%)
> Adults under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 1.1% (Hawaii: 1.8%)
> Adults under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 10.9% (Hawaii: 19.0%)
> Adults under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 1.6% (Hawaii: 1.5%)
> Adults under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 69.2% (Hawaii: 66.3%)
> Adults under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 11.6% (Hawaii: 9.5%)
> Adults under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 11.7% (Hawaii: 8.8%)
[in-text-ad]
Idaho: Caldwell
> Adults under 65, no health insurance: 15.7% (Idaho: 12.4%)
> Adults under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 2.6% (Idaho: 2.8%)
> Adults under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 32.7% (Idaho: 18.2%)
> Adults under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 2.1% (Idaho: 1.6%)
> Adults under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 44.9% (Idaho: 57.4%)
> Adults under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 8.8% (Idaho: 13.8%)
> Adults under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 1.2% (Idaho: 2.5%)
Illinois: Cicero
> Adults under 65, no health insurance: 19.8% (Illinois: 7.9%)
> Adults under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 1.4% (Illinois: 2.4%)
> Adults under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 36.9% (Illinois: 21.0%)
> Adults under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 0.3% (Illinois: 0.8%)
> Adults under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 39.5% (Illinois: 63.6%)
> Adults under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 4.7% (Illinois: 9.5%)
> Adults under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 0.1% (Illinois: 0.9%)
Indiana: Goshen
> Adults under 65, no health insurance: 17.1% (Indiana: 9.8%)
> Adults under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 3.0% (Indiana: 3.2%)
> Adults under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 23.9% (Indiana: 19.1%)
> Adults under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 0.6% (Indiana: 1.2%)
> Adults under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 53.8% (Indiana: 64.2%)
> Adults under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 7.1% (Indiana: 8.8%)
> Adults under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 0.6% (Indiana: 1.2%)
[in-text-ad-2]
Iowa: Marshalltown
> Adults under 65, no health insurance: 9.1% (Iowa: 5.5%)
> Adults under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 3.2% (Iowa: 2.5%)
> Adults under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 29.3% (Iowa: 20.4%)
> Adults under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 1.3% (Iowa: 1.1%)
> Adults under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 59.9% (Iowa: 67.4%)
> Adults under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 6.3% (Iowa: 10.6%)
> Adults under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 0.8% (Iowa: 1.3%)
Kansas: Kansas City
> Adults under 65, no health insurance: 21.0% (Kansas: 10.3%)
> Adults under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 3.5% (Kansas: 2.7%)
> Adults under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 27.5% (Kansas: 14.5%)
> Adults under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 1.2% (Kansas: 1.4%)
> Adults under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 45.8% (Kansas: 65.2%)
> Adults under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 6.8% (Kansas: 11.4%)
> Adults under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 1.3% (Kansas: 3.4%)
[in-text-ad]
Kentucky: Frankfort
> Adults under 65, no health insurance: 11.5% (Kentucky: 6.7%)
> Adults under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 3.8% (Kentucky: 5.0%)
> Adults under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 24.7% (Kentucky: 28.5%)
> Adults under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 1.3% (Kentucky: 1.5%)
> Adults under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 57.9% (Kentucky: 57.3%)
> Adults under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 6.3% (Kentucky: 8.2%)
> Adults under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 1.6% (Kentucky: 2.3%)
Louisiana: Kenner
> Adults under 65, no health insurance: 16.8% (Louisiana: 11.0%)
> Adults under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 3.3% (Louisiana: 4.0%)
> Adults under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 28.7% (Louisiana: 28.4%)
> Adults under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 0.8% (Louisiana: 1.3%)
> Adults under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 46.8% (Louisiana: 52.3%)
> Adults under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 7.7% (Louisiana: 9.6%)
> Adults under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 1.3% (Louisiana: 2.2%)
Maine: Lewiston
> Adults under 65, no health insurance: 13.1% (Maine: 9.8%)
> Adults under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 5.5% (Maine: 4.5%)
> Adults under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 26.4% (Maine: 19.3%)
> Adults under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 1.5% (Maine: 1.8%)
> Adults under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 56.5% (Maine: 61.5%)
> Adults under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 7.3% (Maine: 11.0%)
> Adults under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 1.3% (Maine: 2.3%)
[in-text-ad-2]
Maryland: Chillum
> Adults under 65, no health insurance: 25.8% (Maryland: 6.9%)
> Adults under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 1.7% (Maryland: 2.6%)
> Adults under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 27.8% (Maryland: 19.1%)
> Adults under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 0.8% (Maryland: 1.2%)
> Adults under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 40.0% (Maryland: 65.7%)
> Adults under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 7.5% (Maryland: 9.6%)
> Adults under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 0.5% (Maryland: 3.1%)
Massachusetts: Chelsea
> Adults under 65, no health insurance: 7.9% (Massachusetts: 3.2%)
> Adults under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 2.4% (Massachusetts: 2.5%)
> Adults under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 54.1% (Massachusetts: 24.0%)
> Adults under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 0.5% (Massachusetts: 0.6%)
> Adults under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 36.3% (Massachusetts: 67.5%)
> Adults under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 5.7% (Massachusetts: 9.9%)
> Adults under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 0.5% (Massachusetts: 0.8%)
[in-text-ad]
Michigan: Pontiac
> Adults under 65, no health insurance: 13.7% (Michigan: 6.5%)
> Adults under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 5.3% (Michigan: 3.7%)
> Adults under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 44.7% (Michigan: 24.2%)
> Adults under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 0.7% (Michigan: 1.0%)
> Adults under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 38.3% (Michigan: 63.3%)
> Adults under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 6.1% (Michigan: 9.1%)
> Adults under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 0.3% (Michigan: 0.9%)
24/7 Wall St.
Minnesota: Brooklyn Center
> Adults under 65, no health insurance: 9.7% (Minnesota: 5.2%)
> Adults under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 2.5% (Minnesota: 2.1%)
> Adults under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 35.0% (Minnesota: 19.4%)
> Adults under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 0.9% (Minnesota: 1.0%)
> Adults under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 52.2% (Minnesota: 68.6%)
> Adults under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 7.6% (Minnesota: 9.9%)
> Adults under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 0.4% (Minnesota: 1.0%)
Mississippi: Gulfport
> Adults under 65, no health insurance: 20.9% (Mississippi: 14.5%)
> Adults under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 3.8% (Mississippi: 4.7%)
> Adults under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 27.8% (Mississippi: 25.1%)
> Adults under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 2.8% (Mississippi: 1.4%)
> Adults under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 41.3% (Mississippi: 51.2%)
> Adults under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 7.1% (Mississippi: 9.5%)
> Adults under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 8.2% (Mississippi: 3.0%)
[in-text-ad-2]
Missouri: Grandview
> Adults under 65, no health insurance: 17.9% (Missouri: 11.1%)
> Adults under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 3.2% (Missouri: 3.8%)
> Adults under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 19.3% (Missouri: 15.8%)
> Adults under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 1.7% (Missouri: 1.4%)
> Adults under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 52.1% (Missouri: 62.9%)
> Adults under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 11.2% (Missouri: 10.5%)
> Adults under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 2.1% (Missouri: 2.0%)
Montana: Great Falls
> Adults under 65, no health insurance: 10.2% (Montana: 10.9%)
> Adults under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 3.5% (Montana: 3.0%)
> Adults under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 25.3% (Montana: 21.4%)
> Adults under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 3.2% (Montana: 2.1%)
> Adults under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 52.2% (Montana: 54.9%)
> Adults under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 8.6% (Montana: 13.9%)
> Adults under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 9.8% (Montana: 3.0%)
[in-text-ad]
Nebraska: Grand Island
> Adults under 65, no health insurance: 14.3% (Nebraska: 9.5%)
> Adults under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 1.9% (Nebraska: 2.2%)
> Adults under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 18.9% (Nebraska: 13.4%)
> Adults under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 1.6% (Nebraska: 1.4%)
> Adults under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 62.6% (Nebraska: 66.1%)
> Adults under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 8.0% (Nebraska: 12.9%)
> Adults under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 0.9% (Nebraska: 2.7%)
Nevada: Sunrise Manor
> Adults under 65, no health insurance: 19.3% (Nevada: 12.9%)
> Adults under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 2.9% (Nevada: 2.5%)
> Adults under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 30.9% (Nevada: 20.0%)
> Adults under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 1.5% (Nevada: 1.7%)
> Adults under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 45.7% (Nevada: 58.7%)
> Adults under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 5.1% (Nevada: 9.1%)
> Adults under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 2.1% (Nevada: 2.7%)
New Hampshire: Manchester
> Adults under 65, no health insurance: 11.3% (New Hampshire: 7.1%)
> Adults under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 3.9% (New Hampshire: 3.2%)
> Adults under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 24.2% (New Hampshire: 14.6%)
> Adults under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 1.3% (New Hampshire: 1.3%)
> Adults under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 57.2% (New Hampshire: 69.8%)
> Adults under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 7.5% (New Hampshire: 9.3%)
> Adults under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 1.1% (New Hampshire: 1.5%)
[in-text-ad-2]
New Jersey: Plainfield
> Adults under 65, no health insurance: 28.8% (New Jersey: 9.0%)
> Adults under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 2.6% (New Jersey: 2.4%)
> Adults under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 28.8% (New Jersey: 17.7%)
> Adults under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 0.6% (New Jersey: 0.4%)
> Adults under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 38.0% (New Jersey: 66.5%)
> Adults under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 5.8% (New Jersey: 8.9%)
> Adults under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 0.6% (New Jersey: 0.7%)
New Mexico: Santa Fe
> Adults under 65, no health insurance: 16.4% (New Mexico: 11.4%)
> Adults under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 2.9% (New Mexico: 3.6%)
> Adults under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 29.2% (New Mexico: 35.6%)
> Adults under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 1.1% (New Mexico: 1.7%)
> Adults under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 45.2% (New Mexico: 46.4%)
> Adults under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 12.0% (New Mexico: 8.0%)
> Adults under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 1.2% (New Mexico: 3.3%)
[in-text-ad]
New York: Spring Valley
> Adults under 65, no health insurance: 19.9% (New York: 6.7%)
> Adults under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 2.7% (New York: 2.8%)
> Adults under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 48.6% (New York: 26.9%)
> Adults under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 0.1% (New York: 0.6%)
> Adults under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 27.4% (New York: 59.7%)
> Adults under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 7.2% (New York: 10.8%)
> Adults under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 0.3% (New York: 0.7%)
North Carolina: Monroe
> Adults under 65, no health insurance: 21.3% (North Carolina: 12.6%)
> Adults under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 2.5% (North Carolina: 3.5%)
> Adults under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 27.5% (North Carolina: 19.4%)
> Adults under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 0.7% (North Carolina: 1.7%)
> Adults under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 44.2% (North Carolina: 55.9%)
> Adults under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 7.6% (North Carolina: 11.7%)
> Adults under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 2.4% (North Carolina: 3.8%)
North Dakota: Williston
> Adults under 65, no health insurance: 15.1% (North Dakota: 8.5%)
> Adults under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 1.0% (North Dakota: 2.1%)
> Adults under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 7.0% (North Dakota: 11.4%)
> Adults under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 2.4% (North Dakota: 1.4%)
> Adults under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 70.8% (North Dakota: 67.6%)
> Adults under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 6.9% (North Dakota: 14.3%)
> Adults under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 1.5% (North Dakota: 3.4%)
[in-text-ad-2]
Ohio: Barberton
> Adults under 65, no health insurance: 11.7% (Ohio: 7.2%)
> Adults under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 6.6% (Ohio: 3.3%)
> Adults under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 32.7% (Ohio: 22.8%)
> Adults under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 1.9% (Ohio: 1.2%)
> Adults under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 49.7% (Ohio: 64.0%)
> Adults under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 6.7% (Ohio: 7.8%)
> Adults under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 0.5% (Ohio: 1.2%)
Oklahoma: Muskogee
> Adults under 65, no health insurance: 19.4% (Oklahoma: 16.5%)
> Adults under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 5.4% (Oklahoma: 3.9%)
> Adults under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 29.3% (Oklahoma: 18.8%)
> Adults under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 3.4% (Oklahoma: 1.8%)
> Adults under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 43.8% (Oklahoma: 54.4%)
> Adults under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 8.3% (Oklahoma: 9.9%)
> Adults under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 1.3% (Oklahoma: 3.1%)
[in-text-ad]
Oregon: Woodburn
> Adults under 65, no health insurance: 12.2% (Oregon: 8.0%)
> Adults under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 1.6% (Oregon: 2.8%)
> Adults under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 39.6% (Oregon: 24.7%)
> Adults under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 0.8% (Oregon: 1.6%)
> Adults under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 46.5% (Oregon: 59.2%)
> Adults under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 3.6% (Oregon: 11.0%)
> Adults under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 0.3% (Oregon: 1.4%)
Pennsylvania: Norristown
> Adults under 65, no health insurance: 17.1% (Pennsylvania: 6.8%)
> Adults under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 4.2% (Pennsylvania: 3.2%)
> Adults under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 35.3% (Pennsylvania: 21.1%)
> Adults under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 0.8% (Pennsylvania: 1.0%)
> Adults under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 45.1% (Pennsylvania: 65.2%)
> Adults under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 5.2% (Pennsylvania: 10.2%)
> Adults under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 0.1% (Pennsylvania: 1.0%)
Rhode Island: Providence
> Adults under 65, no health insurance: 8.3% (Rhode Island: 5.3%)
> Adults under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 3.4% (Rhode Island: 3.4%)
> Adults under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 39.3% (Rhode Island: 23.2%)
> Adults under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 0.6% (Rhode Island: 1.0%)
> Adults under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 45.5% (Rhode Island: 64.1%)
> Adults under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 10.6% (Rhode Island: 10.8%)
> Adults under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 0.4% (Rhode Island: 1.4%)
[in-text-ad-2]
South Carolina: Myrtle Beach
> Adults under 65, no health insurance: 23.5% (South Carolina: 12.6%)
> Adults under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 3.6% (South Carolina: 3.8%)
> Adults under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 26.0% (South Carolina: 20.7%)
> Adults under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 1.2% (South Carolina: 1.8%)
> Adults under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 34.4% (South Carolina: 56.5%)
> Adults under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 13.8% (South Carolina: 10.4%)
> Adults under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 2.4% (South Carolina: 3.7%)
South Dakota: Rapid City
> Adults under 65, no health insurance: 14.1% (South Dakota: 11.2%)
> Adults under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 3.8% (South Dakota: 2.7%)
> Adults under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 19.2% (South Dakota: 15.3%)
> Adults under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 3.2% (South Dakota: 1.9%)
> Adults under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 53.6% (South Dakota: 61.1%)
> Adults under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 11.2% (South Dakota: 13.7%)
> Adults under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 7.4% (South Dakota: 3.4%)
[in-text-ad]
Tennessee: Morristown
> Adults under 65, no health insurance: 19.7% (Tennessee: 11.4%)
> Adults under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 7.4% (Tennessee: 3.8%)
> Adults under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 36.9% (Tennessee: 21.6%)
> Adults under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 1.2% (Tennessee: 1.6%)
> Adults under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 36.4% (Tennessee: 57.8%)
> Adults under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 6.3% (Tennessee: 10.1%)
> Adults under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 0.6% (Tennessee: 2.7%)
Texas: San Juan
> Adults under 65, no health insurance: 37.2% (Texas: 19.4%)
> Adults under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 4.3% (Texas: 2.2%)
> Adults under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 23.9% (Texas: 17.2%)
> Adults under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 1.3% (Texas: 1.3%)
> Adults under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 30.3% (Texas: 54.5%)
> Adults under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 6.3% (Texas: 9.4%)
> Adults under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 0.8% (Texas: 2.3%)
Utah: South Salt Lake
> Adults under 65, no health insurance: 21.9% (Utah: 10.4%)
> Adults under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 2.5% (Utah: 1.5%)
> Adults under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 14.0% (Utah: 10.7%)
> Adults under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 0.4% (Utah: 0.8%)
> Adults under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 56.6% (Utah: 68.4%)
> Adults under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 9.0% (Utah: 12.5%)
> Adults under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 0.0% reported (Utah: 1.8%)
[in-text-ad-2]
Vermont: Burlington*
> Adults under 65, no health insurance: 3.9% (Vermont: 4.8%)
> Adults under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 3.3% (Vermont: 3.8%)
> Adults under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 22.1% (Vermont: 27.1%)
> Adults under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 0.6% (Vermont: 1.2%)
> Adults under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 63.9% (Vermont: 60.5%)
> Adults under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 13.7% (Vermont: 10.1%)
> Adults under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 0.8% (Vermont: 1.6%)
*Because Burlington is the only eligible city in Vermont, it is the city with the worst health insurance coverage by default.
Virginia: Marumsco
> Adults under 65, no health insurance: 23.5% (Virginia: 10.0%)
> Adults under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 1.9% (Virginia: 2.7%)
> Adults under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 14.6% (Virginia: 12.6%)
> Adults under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 1.9% (Virginia: 2.1%)
> Adults under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 52.6% (Virginia: 63.9%)
> Adults under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 8.6% (Virginia: 11.0%)
> Adults under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 4.0% (Virginia: 7.1%)
[in-text-ad]
Washington: Yakima
> Adults under 65, no health insurance: 14.6% (Washington: 7.3%)
> Adults under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 4.3% (Washington: 2.5%)
> Adults under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 38.0% (Washington: 22.0%)
> Adults under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 0.8% (Washington: 1.6%)
> Adults under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 42.1% (Washington: 62.3%)
> Adults under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 7.2% (Washington: 9.7%)
> Adults under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 0.8% (Washington: 3.6%)
24/7 Wall St.
West Virginia: Huntington
> Adults under 65, no health insurance: 10.4% (West Virginia: 7.4%)
> Adults under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 6.6% (West Virginia: 5.4%)
> Adults under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 35.6% (West Virginia: 30.3%)
> Adults under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 1.9% (West Virginia: 1.8%)
> Adults under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 46.7% (West Virginia: 57.1%)
> Adults under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 8.5% (West Virginia: 6.4%)
> Adults under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 1.2% (West Virginia: 1.6%)
Wisconsin: Fitchburg
> Adults under 65, no health insurance: 10.7% (Wisconsin: 6.4%)
> Adults under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 1.2% (Wisconsin: 2.7%)
> Adults under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 17.0% (Wisconsin: 18.0%)
> Adults under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 0.8% (Wisconsin: 1.1%)
> Adults under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 66.3% (Wisconsin: 69.1%)
> Adults under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 10.0% (Wisconsin: 9.4%)
> Adults under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 0.3% (Wisconsin: 1.0%)
[in-text-ad-2]
Wyoming: Casper
> Adults under 65, no health insurance: 15.7% (Wyoming: 13.5%)
> Adults under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 2.2% (Wyoming: 2.3%)
> Adults under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 12.7% (Wyoming: 12.1%)
> Adults under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 1.7% (Wyoming: 1.8%)
> Adults under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 64.1% (Wyoming: 64.1%)
> Adults under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 9.5% (Wyoming: 11.4%)
> Adults under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 1.7% (Wyoming: 3.0%)
Methodology:
To determine the city with the worst health insurance coverage in every state, 24/7 Wall St. reviewed five-year estimates of the percentage of the noninstitutionalized civilian population under 65 without health insurance from the U.S. Census Bureau’s 2019 American Community Survey.
We used census “place” geographies — a category that includes 29,573 incorporated legal entities and census-designated statistical entities. Of those, 29,319 had boundaries that fell within one of the 50 states, while the rest were in the District of Columbia or Puerto Rico.
We defined cities based on a population threshold — having more than 25,000 people — and 1,774 of the places fell within this threshold.
Cities were excluded if the sampling error associated with a city’s data was deemed too high.
The sampling error was defined as too high if the coefficient of variation — a statistical assessment of how reliable an estimate is — for a city’s under 65 uninsured rate was above 15% and greater than two standard deviations above the mean CV for all cities’ under 65 uninsured rates. We similarly excluded cities that had a sampling error too high for their under 65 noninstitutionalized civilian population, using the same definition.
We selected the under 65 age group because Americans become eligible for Medicare at age 65, and the uninsured rate for the population above this age is less than 1% nationwide. However, because the census does not publish insurance coverage estimates specifically for the under 65 age group, we aggregated the data from more granular age breakouts.
To ensure each aggregate estimate’s sampling error could be assessed using the definition above, we derived a margin of error for each aggregate estimate using the successive differences replication variance estimation methodology recommended and used by the U.S. Census Bureau.
The remaining 1,668 places were ranked within their state based on their under 65 uninsured rates. To break ties, we used the number of insured people in the same population group.
The share of the population covered by each type of insurance — Medicare, Medicaid, VA, employer, direct-purchase, and Tricare/military — are for the same cohort and are also aggregated from five-year ACS estimates. The estimates reflect people who are covered by that type of insurance alone or in combination with other types on the list. So, when a person is covered by more than one type of insurance, they are included in each group.
Want to Retire Early? Start Here (Sponsor)
Want retirement to come a few years earlier than you’d planned? Or are you ready to retire now, but want an extra set of eyes on your finances?
Now you can speak with up to 3 financial experts in your area for FREE. By simply clicking here you can begin to match with financial professionals who can help you build your plan to retire early. And the best part? The first conversation with them is free.
Click here to match with up to 3 financial pros who would be excited to help you make financial decisions.
Thank you for reading! Have some feedback for us?
Contact the 24/7 Wall St. editorial team.
Latest from 24/7
