The places where most people live in America have evolved over time. At one point, the largest cities in the U.S. were all along the East Coast, but that has changed as more parts of America were settled and developed. What hasn’t changed since the 1790s is the largest U.S. city by population. Just as it was 200 years ago, America’s largest city today is New York.
Over time, people migrated west, and the South further developed. Chicago was the first really big city in the center of the country. It had over 1.6 million residents in 1900 and was second most populous at the turn of the 19th century. Detroit had only 285,000 residents at the time, which would grow many times by 1950 as people migrated to the city to find jobs in the car industry.
The migration of Americans to the West Coast triggered the rise of large cities there, but that happened decades after cities in the middle of the country became large metro areas. Los Angeles had only 100,000 residents in 1900. Today, the figure is just below 3.9 million.
At about the same time, the largest cities in Texas also started to grow. Houston had fewer than 45,000 residents in 1900. That figure is 2.3 million today. (This is the largest city in every state.)
To find the largest city in the U.S., 24/7 Wall St. reviewed population data from the Census Bureau 2019 American Community Survey for U.S. cities. For each city we added land and total area from the Census Bureau’s TIGERweb data files and calculated population density. Area figures are current as of Jan. 1, 2021, except for Louisville/Jefferson County, Kentucky, which has data from 2010.
Though New York is also quite large, ranking 21st (in land area) of the 625 cities considered, it has the second highest population density because of the size of its population. Among the 50 largest cities by population, Jacksonville, Florida, has the largest area and one of the lowest population densities.
Today, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, about 39% of the American population — which totals 328.2 million — reside in cities of at least 50,000 people. But out of the roughly 19,500 incorporated cities, towns, and villages in the United States as of 2018, only slightly more than 300 of them had populations above 100,000 people; only 89 had more than 250,000 people; and only 10 were home to a million or more residents.
Some of America’s oldest continuously occupied settlements have evolved into booming cities that continue to grow — click here for the oldest town in every state.
Click here for America’s largest cities by population
New York, New York
> Population: 8,336,817
> Total area (including water) in square miles: 472.4 — #11 of 625 cities
> Land area square miles: 300.5 — #21 of 625 cities
> Population density per sq mile of land area: 27,747 — #2 of 625 cities
[in-text-ad]
Los Angeles, California
> Population: 3,979,537
> Total area (including water) in square miles: 501.6 — #7 of 625 cities
> Land area square miles: 469.5 — #8 of 625 cities
> Population density per sq mile of land area: 8,476 — #58 of 625 cities
24/7 Wall St.
Chicago, Illinois
> Population: 2,693,959
> Total area (including water) in square miles: 234.5 — #29 of 625 cities
> Land area square miles: 227.7 — #27 of 625 cities
> Population density per sq mile of land area: 11,830 — #25 of 625 cities
Houston, Texas
> Population: 2,316,797
> Total area (including water) in square miles: 671.7 — #3 of 625 cities
> Land area square miles: 640.4 — #3 of 625 cities
> Population density per sq mile of land area: 3,618 — #275 of 625 cities
[in-text-ad-2]
Phoenix, Arizona
> Population: 1,680,988
> Total area (including water) in square miles: 519.3 — #5 of 625 cities
> Land area square miles: 518.3 — #5 of 625 cities
> Population density per sq mile of land area: 3,243 — #319 of 625 cities
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
> Population: 1,584,064
> Total area (including water) in square miles: 142.7 — #57 of 625 cities
> Land area square miles: 134.4 — #56 of 625 cities
> Population density per sq mile of land area: 11,790 — #26 of 625 cities
[in-text-ad]
San Antonio, Texas
> Population: 1,547,250
> Total area (including water) in square miles: 504.2 — #6 of 625 cities
> Land area square miles: 498.4 — #6 of 625 cities
> Population density per sq mile of land area: 3,104 — #337 of 625 cities
San Diego, California
> Population: 1,423,852
> Total area (including water) in square miles: 372.4 — #15 of 625 cities
> Land area square miles: 325.9 — #15 of 625 cities
> Population density per sq mile of land area: 4,369 — #197 of 625 cities
Dallas, Texas
> Population: 1,343,565
> Total area (including water) in square miles: 383.5 — #13 of 625 cities
> Land area square miles: 339.6 — #14 of 625 cities
> Population density per sq mile of land area: 3,956 — #238 of 625 cities
[in-text-ad-2]
San Jose, California
> Population: 1,021,786
> Total area (including water) in square miles: 181.4 — #40 of 625 cities
> Land area square miles: 178.3 — #37 of 625 cities
> Population density per sq mile of land area: 5,730 — #113 of 625 cities
Austin, Texas
> Population: 979,263
> Total area (including water) in square miles: 326.5 — #21 of 625 cities
> Land area square miles: 319.9 — #17 of 625 cities
> Population density per sq mile of land area: 3,061 — #344 of 625 cities
[in-text-ad]
Fort Worth, Texas
> Population: 913,656
> Total area (including water) in square miles: 356.9 — #17 of 625 cities
> Land area square miles: 348.6 — #12 of 625 cities
> Population density per sq mile of land area: 2,621 — #409 of 625 cities
24/7 Wall St.
Jacksonville, Florida
> Population: 911,528
> Total area (including water) in square miles: 874.5 — #2 of 625 cities
> Land area square miles: 747.3 — #2 of 625 cities
> Population density per sq mile of land area: 1,220 — #595 of 625 cities
Columbus, Ohio
> Population: 902,073
> Total area (including water) in square miles: 226.0 — #31 of 625 cities
> Land area square miles: 220.1 — #28 of 625 cities
> Population density per sq mile of land area: 4,098 — #225 of 625 cities
[in-text-ad-2]
Charlotte, North Carolina
> Population: 885,707
> Total area (including water) in square miles: 311.1 — #23 of 625 cities
> Land area square miles: 309.2 — #19 of 625 cities
> Population density per sq mile of land area: 2,865 — #374 of 625 cities
San Francisco, California
> Population: 881,549
> Total area (including water) in square miles: 231.9 — #30 of 625 cities
> Land area square miles: 46.9 — #224 of 625 cities
> Population density per sq mile of land area: 18,791 — #6 of 625 cities
[in-text-ad]
Indianapolis, Indiana
> Population: 870,340
> Total area (including water) in square miles: 367.9 — #16 of 625 cities
> Land area square miles: 361.6 — #11 of 625 cities
> Population density per sq mile of land area: 2,407 — #442 of 625 cities
Seattle, Washington
> Population: 753,655
> Total area (including water) in square miles: 142.1 — #58 of 625 cities
> Land area square miles: 83.9 — #103 of 625 cities
> Population density per sq mile of land area: 8,985 — #52 of 625 cities
Denver, Colorado
> Population: 727,211
> Total area (including water) in square miles: 154.7 — #47 of 625 cities
> Land area square miles: 153.1 — #44 of 625 cities
> Population density per sq mile of land area: 4,751 — #165 of 625 cities
[in-text-ad-2]
Washington, District of Columbia
> Population: 705,749
> Total area (including water) in square miles: 68.4 — #148 of 625 cities
> Land area square miles: 61.1 — #157 of 625 cities
> Population density per sq mile of land area: 11,546 — #31 of 625 cities
Boston, Massachusetts
> Population: 694,295
> Total area (including water) in square miles: 89.6 — #109 of 625 cities
> Land area square miles: 48.3 — #216 of 625 cities
> Population density per sq mile of land area: 14,363 — #15 of 625 cities
[in-text-ad]
El Paso, Texas
> Population: 681,729
> Total area (including water) in square miles: 259.2 — #27 of 625 cities
> Land area square miles: 258.4 — #24 of 625 cities
> Population density per sq mile of land area: 2,638 — #407 of 625 cities
24/7 Wall St.
Detroit, Michigan
> Population: 670,052
> Total area (including water) in square miles: 142.9 — #56 of 625 cities
> Land area square miles: 138.7 — #53 of 625 cities
> Population density per sq mile of land area: 4,830 — #159 of 625 cities
Nashville-Davidson, Tennessee
> Population: 668,580
> Total area (including water) in square miles: 497.5 — #9 of 625 cities
> Land area square miles: 475.8 — #7 of 625 cities
> Population density per sq mile of land area: 1,405 — #576 of 625 cities
[in-text-ad-2]
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
> Population: 655,158
> Total area (including water) in square miles: 620.8 — #4 of 625 cities
> Land area square miles: 606.5 — #4 of 625 cities
> Population density per sq mile of land area: 1,080 — #606 of 625 cities
Portland, Oregon
> Population: 653,467
> Total area (including water) in square miles: 145.0 — #53 of 625 cities
> Land area square miles: 133.5 — #57 of 625 cities
> Population density per sq mile of land area: 4,896 — #155 of 625 cities
[in-text-ad]
Las Vegas, Nevada
> Population: 651,297
> Total area (including water) in square miles: 141.9 — #59 of 625 cities
> Land area square miles: 141.8 — #50 of 625 cities
> Population density per sq mile of land area: 4,592 — #178 of 625 cities
Memphis, Tennessee
> Population: 651,088
> Total area (including water) in square miles: 302.6 — #25 of 625 cities
> Land area square miles: 294.9 — #22 of 625 cities
> Population density per sq mile of land area: 2,208 — #468 of 625 cities
Louisville/Jefferson County, Kentucky
> Population: 617,630
> Total area (including water) in square miles: 342.2 — #20 of 625 cities
> Land area square miles: 325.3 — #16 of 625 cities
> Population density per sq mile of land area: 1,899 — #514 of 625 cities
[in-text-ad-2]
Baltimore, Maryland
> Population: 593,490
> Total area (including water) in square miles: 92.0 — #104 of 625 cities
> Land area square miles: 80.9 — #108 of 625 cities
> Population density per sq mile of land area: 7,332 — #74 of 625 cities
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
> Population: 590,157
> Total area (including water) in square miles: 96.8 — #99 of 625 cities
> Land area square miles: 96.2 — #92 of 625 cities
> Population density per sq mile of land area: 6,136 — #102 of 625 cities
[in-text-ad]
Albuquerque, New Mexico
> Population: 560,504
> Total area (including water) in square miles: 189.0 — #38 of 625 cities
> Land area square miles: 187.3 — #34 of 625 cities
> Population density per sq mile of land area: 2,993 — #356 of 625 cities
Tucson, Arizona
> Population: 548,082
> Total area (including water) in square miles: 241.3 — #28 of 625 cities
> Land area square miles: 241.0 — #26 of 625 cities
> Population density per sq mile of land area: 2,274 — #462 of 625 cities
Fresno, California
> Population: 531,581
> Total area (including water) in square miles: 116.8 — #76 of 625 cities
> Land area square miles: 115.6 — #67 of 625 cities
> Population density per sq mile of land area: 4,598 — #175 of 625 cities
[in-text-ad-2]
Mesa, Arizona
> Population: 517,981
> Total area (including water) in square miles: 139.4 — #60 of 625 cities
> Land area square miles: 138.8 — #52 of 625 cities
> Population density per sq mile of land area: 3,732 — #262 of 625 cities
Sacramento, California
> Population: 513,620
> Total area (including water) in square miles: 100.7 — #96 of 625 cities
> Land area square miles: 98.6 — #89 of 625 cities
> Population density per sq mile of land area: 5,209 — #134 of 625 cities
[in-text-ad]
Atlanta, Georgia
> Population: 506,804
> Total area (including water) in square miles: 136.3 — #62 of 625 cities
> Land area square miles: 135.3 — #55 of 625 cities
> Population density per sq mile of land area: 3,745 — #259 of 625 cities
Kansas City, Missouri
> Population: 495,278
> Total area (including water) in square miles: 318.8 — #22 of 625 cities
> Land area square miles: 314.7 — #18 of 625 cities
> Population density per sq mile of land area: 1,574 — #554 of 625 cities
Colorado Springs, Colorado
> Population: 478,215
> Total area (including water) in square miles: 196.2 — #35 of 625 cities
> Land area square miles: 195.8 — #32 of 625 cities
> Population density per sq mile of land area: 2,442 — #437 of 625 cities
[in-text-ad-2]
Omaha, Nebraska
> Population: 478,203
> Total area (including water) in square miles: 146.1 — #52 of 625 cities
> Land area square miles: 142.5 — #48 of 625 cities
> Population density per sq mile of land area: 3,356 — #311 of 625 cities
Raleigh, North Carolina
> Population: 474,708
> Total area (including water) in square miles: 148.2 — #49 of 625 cities
> Land area square miles: 147.1 — #45 of 625 cities
> Population density per sq mile of land area: 3,227 — #323 of 625 cities
[in-text-ad]
Miami, Florida
> Population: 467,968
> Total area (including water) in square miles: 56.1 — #192 of 625 cities
> Land area square miles: 36.0 — #308 of 625 cities
> Population density per sq mile of land area: 13,001 — #19 of 625 cities
Long Beach, California
> Population: 462,645
> Total area (including water) in square miles: 77.8 — #128 of 625 cities
> Land area square miles: 50.7 — #205 of 625 cities
> Population density per sq mile of land area: 9,122 — #48 of 625 cities
Virginia Beach, Virginia
> Population: 449,974
> Total area (including water) in square miles: 497.5 — #8 of 625 cities
> Land area square miles: 244.7 — #25 of 625 cities
> Population density per sq mile of land area: 1,839 — #524 of 625 cities
[in-text-ad-2]
Oakland, California
> Population: 433,044
> Total area (including water) in square miles: 78.0 — #127 of 625 cities
> Land area square miles: 55.9 — #176 of 625 cities
> Population density per sq mile of land area: 7,742 — #68 of 625 cities
Minneapolis, Minnesota
> Population: 429,605
> Total area (including water) in square miles: 57.5 — #187 of 625 cities
> Land area square miles: 54.0 — #190 of 625 cities
> Population density per sq mile of land area: 7,956 — #65 of 625 cities
[in-text-ad]
Tulsa, Oklahoma
> Population: 401,760
> Total area (including water) in square miles: 201.8 — #34 of 625 cities
> Land area square miles: 197.7 — #31 of 625 cities
> Population density per sq mile of land area: 2,032 — #492 of 625 cities
Tampa, Florida
> Population: 399,690
> Total area (including water) in square miles: 175.8 — #43 of 625 cities
> Land area square miles: 114.0 — #68 of 625 cities
> Population density per sq mile of land area: 3,506 — #292 of 625 cities
Arlington, Texas
> Population: 398,860
> Total area (including water) in square miles: 99.4 — #97 of 625 cities
> Land area square miles: 95.8 — #93 of 625 cities
> Population density per sq mile of land area: 4,162 — #219 of 625 cities
[in-text-ad-2]
New Orleans, Louisiana
> Population: 390,144
> Total area (including water) in square miles: 349.8 — #19 of 625 cities
> Land area square miles: 169.5 — #39 of 625 cities
> Population density per sq mile of land area: 2,302 — #458 of 625 cities
Sponsored: Attention Savvy Investors: Speak to 3 Financial Experts – FREE
Ever wanted an extra set of eyes on an investment you’re considering? Now you can speak with up to 3 financial experts in your area for FREE. By simply clicking here you can begin to match with financial professionals who can help guide you through the financial decisions you’re making. And the best part? The first conversation with them is free.Click here to match with up to 3 financial pros who would be excited to help you make financial decisions.
Thank you for reading! Have some feedback for us?
Contact the 24/7 Wall St. editorial team.
Latest from 24/7
