In 2000, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, the United States had a population of 281.4 million people. By 2020, that number had increased to 331.4 million. Almost every major city experienced substantial growth in that time, although the rates varied enormously.
Reviewing data from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey, 24/7 Wall St. has tracked the population change in the nation’s 50 largest cities. (On a less granular lever, here’s how every state’s population has changed since 2010.)
Our list shows some very clear trends: explosive growth in parts of the South and Southwest, slower growth in the North, and decline in parts of the Midwest. These have likely been driven by a number of factors, including economic strength in the Sunbelt states; immigration, notably from Latin America; and varying demographic profiles, with aging baby boomers more concentrated in the North and Northeast.
The fastest growth came in Raleigh, North Carolina, where the population grew by 72.6% between 2000 and 2021, followed by Fort Worth, Texas, with 71.9% growth and Charlotte/Mecklenburg, North Carolina, with an increase of 60.4%. (See the fastest growing city in every state.)
Click here to see population growth since 2020 in America’s largest cities
Three cities in the Midwest and one on the Eastern Seaboard experienced declines. The population of Detroit fell a whopping 30.6%. That city has long suffered from a host of ailments, including deindustrialization, high crime rates, and flight to the suburbs. The population of Baltimore shrank 6.4%, Chicago dropped 5.4%, and Milwaukee was down 1.4%.
50. Detroit, Michigan
> Population change from 2000: -30.6%
> Current population: 660,628
> Population in 2000: 951,270
[in-text-ad]
49. Baltimore, Maryland
> Population change from 2000: -6.4%
> Current population: 609,422
> Population in 2000: 651,154
48. Chicago, Illinois
> Population change from 2000: -5.4%
> Current population: 2,740,225
> Population in 2000: 2,895,964
47. Milwaukee, Wisconsin
> Population change from 2000: -1.4%
> Current population: 588,573
> Population in 2000: 596,956
[in-text-ad-2]
46. Memphis, Tennessee
> Population change from 2000: +0.5%
> Current population: 652,804
> Population in 2000: 649,845
45. Long Beach, California
> Population change from 2000: +2.6%
> Current population: 473,567
> Population in 2000: 461,381
[in-text-ad]
44. Tulsa, Oklahoma
> Population change from 2000: +3.1%
> Current population: 405,327
> Population in 2000: 393,051
43. Oakland, California
> Population change from 2000: +4.4%
> Current population: 417,040
> Population in 2000: 399,477
42. Louisville, Kentucky
> Population change from 2000: +5.1%
> Current population: 627,770
> Population in 2000: 597,337
[in-text-ad-2]
41. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
> Population change from 2000: +5.1%
> Current population: 1,595,579
> Population in 2000: 1,517,550
40. New York, New York
> Population change from 2000: +6.2%
> Current population: 8,502,614
> Population in 2000: 8,008,278
[in-text-ad]
39. Virginia Beach, Virginia
> Population change from 2000: +6.6%
> Current population: 453,291
> Population in 2000: 425,257
38. Los Angeles, California
> Population change from 2000: +7.4%
> Current population: 3,967,152
> Population in 2000: 3,694,834
37. Minneapolis, Minnesota
> Population change from 2000: +10.9%
> Current population: 424,175
> Population in 2000: 382,452
[in-text-ad-2]
36. San Jose, California
> Population change from 2000: +13.4%
> Current population: 1,013,400
> Population in 2000: 893,889
35. San Francisco, California
> Population change from 2000: +13.5%
> Current population: 881,791
> Population in 2000: 776,733
[in-text-ad]
34. Honolulu, Hawaii
> Population change from 2000: +13.6%
> Current population: 995,251
> Population in 2000: 875,784
33. San Diego, California
> Population change from 2000: +14.0%
> Current population: 1,394,515
> Population in 2000: 1,223,341
32. Tucson, Arizona
> Population change from 2000: +14.6%
> Current population: 557,827
> Population in 2000: 486,591
[in-text-ad-2]
31. Kansas City, Missouri
> Population change from 2000: +15.5%
> Current population: 509,608
> Population in 2000: 441,269
30. Dallas, Texas
> Population change from 2000: +16.1%
> Current population: 1,379,343
> Population in 2000: 1,188,204
[in-text-ad]
29. Wichita, Kansas
> Population change from 2000: +16.1%
> Current population: 399,411
> Population in 2000: 343,997
28. Arlington, Texas
> Population change from 2000: +18.2%
> Current population: 393,408
> Population in 2000: 332,695
27. Boston, Massachusetts
> Population change from 2000: +18.7%
> Current population: 699,253
> Population in 2000: 589,141
[in-text-ad-2]
26. Atlanta, Georgia
> Population change from 2000: +21.0%
> Current population: 503,991
> Population in 2000: 416,629
25. Phoenix, Arizona
> Population change from 2000: +23.3%
> Current population: 1,628,812
> Population in 2000: 1,320,994
[in-text-ad]
24. Washington, District of Columbia
> Population change from 2000: +23.4%
> Current population: 706,137
> Population in 2000: 572,059
23. Houston, Texas
> Population change from 2000: +23.8%
> Current population: 2,419,240
> Population in 2000: 1,954,848
22. Portland, Oregon
> Population change from 2000: +24.1%
> Current population: 656,300
> Population in 2000: 529,025
[in-text-ad-2]
21. El Paso, Texas
> Population change from 2000: +24.4%
> Current population: 702,073
> Population in 2000: 564,280
20. Columbus, Ohio
> Population change from 2000: +24.8%
> Current population: 888,145
> Population in 2000: 711,644
[in-text-ad]
19. Fresno, California
> Population change from 2000: +24.8%
> Current population: 533,232
> Population in 2000: 427,224
18. Sacramento, California
> Population change from 2000: +24.9%
> Current population: 508,357
> Population in 2000: 407,075
17. Omaha, Nebraska
> Population change from 2000: +27.3%
> Current population: 496,604
> Population in 2000: 390,112
[in-text-ad-2]
16. Miami, Florida
> Population change from 2000: +27.4%
> Current population: 461,859
> Population in 2000: 362,563
15. San Antonio, Texas
> Population change from 2000: +27.4%
> Current population: 1,458,346
> Population in 2000: 1,144,554
[in-text-ad]
14. Jacksonville, Florida
> Population change from 2000: +27.5%
> Current population: 937,821
> Population in 2000: 735,503
13. Albuquerque, New Mexico
> Population change from 2000: +27.5%
> Current population: 572,101
> Population in 2000: 448,627
12. Nashville/Davidson, Tennessee
> Population change from 2000: +27.7%
> Current population: 696,653
> Population in 2000: 545,549
[in-text-ad-2]
11. Tampa, Florida
> Population change from 2000: +28.8%
> Current population: 390,996
> Population in 2000: 303,512
10. Mesa, Arizona
> Population change from 2000: +29.4%
> Current population: 514,144
> Population in 2000: 397,215
[in-text-ad]
9. Seattle, Washington
> Population change from 2000: +31.4%
> Current population: 740,227
> Population in 2000: 563,375
8. Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
> Population change from 2000: +32.5%
> Current population: 670,553
> Population in 2000: 506,132
7. Denver, Ohio
> Population change from 2000: +33.7%
> Current population: 741,500
> Population in 2000: 554,636
[in-text-ad-2]
6. Colorado Springs, Colorado
> Population change from 2000: +34.7%
> Current population: 485,817
> Population in 2000: 360,798
5. Austin, Texas
> Population change from 2000: +50.1%
> Current population: 985,370
> Population in 2000: 656,302
[in-text-ad]
4. Bakersfield, California
> Population change from 2000: +57.2%
> Current population: 388,817
> Population in 2000: 247,385
3. Charlotte/Mecklenburg, North Carolina
> Population change from 2000: +60.4%
> Current population: 1,115,617
> Population in 2000: 695,454
2. Fort Worth, Texas
> Population change from 2000: +71.9%
> Current population: 920,349
> Population in 2000: 535,420
[in-text-ad-2]
1. Raleigh, North Carolina
> Population change from 2000: +72.6%
> Current population: 477,476
> Population in 2000: 276,579
Is Your Money Earning the Best Possible Rate? (Sponsor)
Let’s face it: If your money is just sitting in a checking account, you’re losing value every single day. With most checking accounts offering little to no interest, the cash you worked so hard to save is gradually being eroded by inflation.
However, by moving that money into a high-yield savings account, you can put your cash to work, growing steadily with little to no effort on your part. In just a few clicks, you can set up a high-yield savings account and start earning interest immediately.
There are plenty of reputable banks and online platforms that offer competitive rates, and many of them come with zero fees and no minimum balance requirements. Click here to see if you’re earning the best possible rate on your money!
Thank you for reading! Have some feedback for us?
Contact the 24/7 Wall St. editorial team.