Americans over the past century have followed the old adage about “Go West, young man.” Beginning just after the turn of the 20th century, the West’s population soared, growing from nearly 7.1 million in 1910 to 9.2 million in 1920, a 30% jump in that decade alone, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.
The region has continued this rapid growth to reach a total population of 78.6 million as of 2020. Within that larger geographic area, several states have experienced among the nation’s largest population booms since 1880.
To determine the states where the population has grown the most since 1880, 24/7 Wall St. reviewed historical population data from 1880 to 2020 from the U.S. Census Bureau’s Decennial Census of Population and Housing and centers of population data. States are ranked by the change in population from 1880 to 2020. While 1880 is the first year of data for almost all states, it is 1890 for Oklahoma, 1930 for Hawaii, and 1960 for Alaska.
Arizona’s population soared from a bit over 40,000 to a current 7.2 million between 1880 and 2020, a 176.8-fold increase. And that’s for a territory that didn’t become an official state until 1912. (Learn how each state got its shape.)
Arizona became a territory in 1846, when the U.S. seized the area from Mexico. When silver and copper deposits were found in the state in the 1870s, Arizona’s population climbed from 10,000 in 1870 to 122,000 by 1900. But the state’s population really took off during World War II, when military bases and defense installations were established there, a study by the University of Washington notes.
Completed in 1936, the Hoover Dam also ushered in an era of growth in the Phoenix area. And the invention of air conditioning made Arizona’s unbearably arid climate more palatable for newcomers, spurring its in-migration.
Further west and north, Washington state recorded the second highest population growth among states between 1880 and 2020. The Pacific Northwest state’s population grew from 75,000 to 7.7 million, a 102.6-fold hike.
What did it take to attract newcomers to the somewhat isolated area? The completion of the Northern Pacific Railroad in 1883, which ran from St. Paul, Minnesota, to Tacoma, Washington, was a significant factor, the University of Washington points out. Instead of an arduous overland trek, people could simply take a train to the state and put down roots. More recently, its major city, Seattle, has become a major hub of the country’s tech industry.
At the other end of the spectrum is Vermont. The New England state witnessed a paltry 1.9-fold increase in population between 1880 and 2020, the lowest among all 50 states. Its current population totals fewer than 644,000 residents.
Art Woolf, former economics professor at the University of Vermont and a columnist for VTDigger.org, a statewide news site, told Vermont Public Radio the state’s cold climate and lack of large cities may be keeping newcomers away. (See the places with the biggest snowfall in history in every state.)
Click here to see states where the population has grown the most since 1880
50. Vermont
> Population growth, 1880 to 2020: 310,791 (+1.9 fold increase)
> Total population,1880: 332,286 — 19th smallest
> Total population, 2020: 643,077 — 2nd smallest
[in-text-ad]
49. Iowa
> Population growth, 1880 to 2020: 1.6 million (+2.0 fold increase)
> Total population,1880: 1,624,615 — 10th largest
> Total population, 2020: 3,190,369 — 20th smallest
24/7 Wall St.
48. Maine
> Population growth, 1880 to 2020: 713,423 (+2.1 fold increase)
> Total population,1880: 648,936 — 24th smallest
> Total population, 2020: 1,362,359 — 9th smallest
47. Mississippi
> Population growth, 1880 to 2020: 1.8 million (+2.6 fold increase)
> Total population,1880: 1,131,597 — 18th largest
> Total population, 2020: 2,961,279 — 17th smallest
[in-text-ad-2]
46. Kentucky
> Population growth, 1880 to 2020: 2.9 million (+2.7 fold increase)
> Total population,1880: 1,648,690 — 8th largest
> Total population, 2020: 4,505,836 — 25th smallest
45. Missouri
> Population growth, 1880 to 2020: 4.0 million (+2.8 fold increase)
> Total population,1880: 2,168,380 — 5th largest
> Total population, 2020: 6,154,913 — 19th largest
[in-text-ad]
44. West Virginia
> Population growth, 1880 to 2020: 1.2 million (+2.9 fold increase)
> Total population,1880: 618,457 — 22nd smallest
> Total population, 2020: 1,793,716 — 12th smallest
24/7 Wall St.
43. Kansas
> Population growth, 1880 to 2020: 1.9 million (+2.9 fold increase)
> Total population,1880: 996,096 — 20th largest
> Total population, 2020: 2,937,880 — 16th smallest
42. Pennsylvania
> Population growth, 1880 to 2020: 8.7 million (+3.0 fold increase)
> Total population,1880: 4,282,891 — 2nd largest
> Total population, 2020: 13,002,700 — 5th largest
[in-text-ad-2]
41. Alaska
> Population growth, 1960 to 2020: 507,224 (+3.2 fold increase)
> Total population,1960: 33,426 — in 1960
> Total population, 2020: 733,391 — 3rd smallest
40. Indiana
> Population growth, 1880 to 2020: 4.8 million (+3.4 fold increase)
> Total population,1880: 1,978,301 — 6th largest
> Total population, 2020: 6,785,528 — 17th largest
[in-text-ad]
39. Ohio
> Population growth, 1880 to 2020: 8.6 million (+3.7 fold increase)
> Total population,1880: 3,198,062 — 3rd largest
> Total population, 2020: 11,799,448 — 7th largest
38. Arkansas
> Population growth, 1880 to 2020: 2.2 million (+3.8 fold increase)
> Total population,1880: 802,525 — 25th largest
> Total population, 2020: 3,011,524 — 18th smallest
37. Massachusetts
> Population growth, 1880 to 2020: 5.2 million (+3.9 fold increase)
> Total population,1880: 1,783,085 — 7th largest
> Total population, 2020: 7,029,917 — 15th largest
[in-text-ad-2]
36. Hawaii
> Population growth, 1930 to 2020: 1.1 million (+4.0 fold increase)
> Total population,1930: 368,336 — in 1930
> Total population, 2020: 1,455,271 — 11th smallest
35. Rhode Island
> Population growth, 1880 to 2020: 820,848 (+4.0 fold increase)
> Total population,1880: 276,531 — 18th smallest
> Total population, 2020: 1,097,379 — 8th smallest
[in-text-ad]
34. New Hampshire
> Population growth, 1880 to 2020: 1.0 million (+4.0 fold increase)
> Total population,1880: 346,991 — 20th smallest
> Total population, 2020: 1,377,529 — 10th smallest
24/7 Wall St.
33. New York
> Population growth, 1880 to 2020: 15.1 million (+4.0 fold increase)
> Total population,1880: 5,082,871 — the largest
> Total population, 2020: 20,201,249 — 4th largest
32. Alabama
> Population growth, 1880 to 2020: 3.8 million (+4.0 fold increase)
> Total population,1880: 1,262,505 — 17th largest
> Total population, 2020: 5,024,279 — 24th largest
[in-text-ad-2]
31. Illinois
> Population growth, 1880 to 2020: 9.7 million (+4.2 fold increase)
> Total population,1880: 3,077,871 — 4th largest
> Total population, 2020: 12,812,508 — 6th largest
30. Nebraska
> Population growth, 1880 to 2020: 1.5 million (+4.3 fold increase)
> Total population,1880: 452,402 — 21st smallest
> Total population, 2020: 1,961,504 — 14th smallest
[in-text-ad]
29. Wisconsin
> Population growth, 1880 to 2020: 4.6 million (+4.5 fold increase)
> Total population,1880: 1,315,497 — 16th largest
> Total population, 2020: 5,893,718 — 20th largest
28. Tennessee
> Population growth, 1880 to 2020: 5.4 million (+4.5 fold increase)
> Total population,1880: 1,542,359 — 12th largest
> Total population, 2020: 6,910,840 — 16th largest
27. Louisiana
> Population growth, 1880 to 2020: 3.7 million (+5.0 fold increase)
> Total population,1880: 939,946 — 22nd largest
> Total population, 2020: 4,657,757 — 25th largest
[in-text-ad-2]
26. South Carolina
> Population growth, 1880 to 2020: 4.1 million (+5.1 fold increase)
> Total population,1880: 995,577 — 21st largest
> Total population, 2020: 5,118,425 — 23rd largest
25. Virginia
> Population growth, 1880 to 2020: 7.1 million (+5.7 fold increase)
> Total population,1880: 1,512,565 — 14th largest
> Total population, 2020: 8,631,393 — 12th largest
[in-text-ad]
24. Connecticut
> Population growth, 1880 to 2020: 3.0 million (+5.8 fold increase)
> Total population,1880: 622,700 — 23rd smallest
> Total population, 2020: 3,605,944 — 22nd smallest
23. Michigan
> Population growth, 1880 to 2020: 8.4 million (+6.2 fold increase)
> Total population,1880: 1,636,937 — 9th largest
> Total population, 2020: 10,077,331 — 10th largest
22. Maryland
> Population growth, 1880 to 2020: 5.2 million (+6.6 fold increase)
> Total population,1880: 934,943 — 23rd largest
> Total population, 2020: 6,177,224 — 18th largest
[in-text-ad-2]
21. Delaware
> Population growth, 1880 to 2020: 843,340 (+6.8 fold increase)
> Total population,1880: 146,608 — 14th smallest
> Total population, 2020: 989,948 — 6th smallest
20. Georgia
> Population growth, 1880 to 2020: 9.2 million (+6.9 fold increase)
> Total population,1880: 1,542,180 — 13th largest
> Total population, 2020: 10,711,908 — 8th largest
[in-text-ad]
19. Minnesota
> Population growth, 1880 to 2020: 4.9 million (+7.3 fold increase)
> Total population,1880: 780,773 — 25th smallest
> Total population, 2020: 5,706,494 — 22nd largest
18. North Carolina
> Population growth, 1880 to 2020: 9.0 million (+7.5 fold increase)
> Total population,1880: 1,399,750 — 15th largest
> Total population, 2020: 10,439,388 — 9th largest
17. New Jersey
> Population growth, 1880 to 2020: 8.2 million (+8.2 fold increase)
> Total population,1880: 1,131,116 — 19th largest
> Total population, 2020: 9,288,994 — 11th largest
[in-text-ad-2]
16. South Dakota
> Population growth, 1880 to 2020: 788,399 (+9.0 fold increase)
> Total population,1880: 98,268 — 11th smallest
> Total population, 2020: 886,667 — 5th smallest
15. Oklahoma
> Population growth, 1890 to 2020: 3.7 million (+15.3 fold increase)
> Total population,1890: 258,657 — in 1890
> Total population, 2020: 3,959,353 — 23rd smallest
[in-text-ad]
14. New Mexico
> Population growth, 1880 to 2020: 2.0 million (+17.7 fold increase)
> Total population,1880: 119,565 — 12th smallest
> Total population, 2020: 2,117,522 — 15th smallest
13. Texas
> Population growth, 1880 to 2020: 27.6 million (+18.3 fold increase)
> Total population,1880: 1,591,749 — 11th largest
> Total population, 2020: 29,145,505 — 2nd largest
12. North Dakota
> Population growth, 1880 to 2020: 742,185 (+21.1 fold increase)
> Total population,1880: 36,909 — 6th smallest
> Total population, 2020: 779,094 — 4th smallest
[in-text-ad-2]
11. Utah
> Population growth, 1880 to 2020: 3.1 million (+22.7 fold increase)
> Total population,1880: 143,963 — 13th smallest
> Total population, 2020: 3,271,616 — 21st smallest
10. Oregon
> Population growth, 1880 to 2020: 4.1 million (+24.2 fold increase)
> Total population,1880: 174,768 — 15th smallest
> Total population, 2020: 4,237,256 — 24th smallest
[in-text-ad]
9. Montana
> Population growth, 1880 to 2020: 1.0 million (+27.7 fold increase)
> Total population,1880: 39,159 — 7th smallest
> Total population, 2020: 1,084,225 — 7th smallest
8. Wyoming
> Population growth, 1880 to 2020: 556,062 (+27.7 fold increase)
> Total population,1880: 20,789 — 4th smallest
> Total population, 2020: 576,851 — the smallest
7. Colorado
> Population growth, 1880 to 2020: 5.6 million (+29.7 fold increase)
> Total population,1880: 194,327 — 16th smallest
> Total population, 2020: 5,773,714 — 21st largest
[in-text-ad-2]
6. California
> Population growth, 1880 to 2020: 38.7 million (+45.7 fold increase)
> Total population,1880: 864,694 — 24th largest
> Total population, 2020: 39,538,223 — the largest
5. Nevada
> Population growth, 1880 to 2020: 3.0 million (+49.9 fold increase)
> Total population,1880: 62,266 — 9th smallest
> Total population, 2020: 3,104,614 — 19th smallest
[in-text-ad]
4. Idaho
> Population growth, 1880 to 2020: 1.8 million (+56.4 fold increase)
> Total population,1880: 32,610 — 5th smallest
> Total population, 2020: 1,839,106 — 13th smallest
3. Florida
> Population growth, 1880 to 2020: 21.3 million (+79.9 fold increase)
> Total population,1880: 269,493 — 17th smallest
> Total population, 2020: 21,538,187 — 3rd largest
2. Washington
> Population growth, 1880 to 2020: 7.6 million (+102.6 fold increase)
> Total population,1880: 75,116 — 10th smallest
> Total population, 2020: 7,705,281 — 13th largest
[in-text-ad-2]
1. Arizona
> Population growth, 1880 to 2020: 7.1 million (+176.8 fold increase)
> Total population,1880: 40,440 — 8th smallest
> Total population, 2020: 7,151,502 — 14th largest
Is Your Money Earning the Best Possible Rate? (Sponsor)
Let’s face it: If your money is just sitting in a checking account, you’re losing value every single day. With most checking accounts offering little to no interest, the cash you worked so hard to save is gradually being eroded by inflation.
However, by moving that money into a high-yield savings account, you can put your cash to work, growing steadily with little to no effort on your part. In just a few clicks, you can set up a high-yield savings account and start earning interest immediately.
There are plenty of reputable banks and online platforms that offer competitive rates, and many of them come with zero fees and no minimum balance requirements. Click here to see if you’re earning the best possible rate on your money!
Thank you for reading! Have some feedback for us?
Contact the 24/7 Wall St. editorial team.
Latest from 24/7
