The United States is mostly a vast, public transportation desert, especially compared to other developed European or Asian countries. Buses, trains, light rail systems, and subways tend to have lower ridership levels and longer wait times in part due to the country’s suburban sprawl, car culture, and a public generally unwilling to support loss-leading transportation policies supported by public money.
Outside of a handful of large urban areas, most Americans rely heavily on private vehicles while the carless are left with few low-cost commuting and errand-running options. But there are some pockets of the country with fairly decent public transport options. (These are the cities with the longest commutes.)
To determine the 25 small cities with the best public transportation systems, 24/7 Wall St. constructed an index using data on transit ridership and performance for all U.S. transit systems from the Federal Transit Administration’s National Transit Database, the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey, and other sources.
These 25 small American cities have the best systems to move people around, mostly by bus. Three of them also offer ferry service, and two — Alexandria, Virginia, and Salt Lake City — have light rail systems. (What it actually costs to live in America’s most expensive cities.)
The share of commuters who use public transport in these small cities averages about 11%, and ridership averages about 22 people per hour. The age of the vehicles (mostly buses) used by these systems ranges from 3.2 years in Vail, Colorado, to 11.5 years in Ames, Iowa.
Thanks to its proximity to the nation’s capital, Virginia has the largest number of small cities with the best public transportation infrastructure on this list: Blacksburg, Arlington, Richmond, and Alexandria. New York has three cities on the list: Ithaca, Long Beach, and Albany.
The country’s largest state by population, California, has only two small cities with the best public transportation, Santa Cruz and Davis, but Davis leads the cities on this list in the average number of users per hour. Texas, the second-largest state by population, has no cities on the list. Only 16 states have small U.S. cities with the best public transportation based on ridership, frequency, and fleet age.
Here is the small American city with the best public transportation
Click here to read our detailed methodology
25. Bremerton, WA
> Commuters using public transit: 7.7%
> Ridership, all systems: 9.5 passengers per hour
> Avg. age of fleet: 9.1 years
> Modes of transit: Bus, demand response, ferryboat, vanpool
[in-text-ad]
24. Iowa City, IA
> Commuters using public transit: 7.8%
> Ridership, all systems: 25.2 passengers per hour
> Avg. age of fleet: 8.2 years
> Modes of transit: Bus, demand response
24/7 Wall St.
23. Ithaca, NY
> Commuters using public transit: 12.5%
> Ridership, all systems: 12.6 passengers per hour
> Avg. age of fleet: 5.1 years
> Modes of transit: Bus, demand response
22. Santa Cruz, CA
> Commuters using public transit: 5.4%
> Ridership, all systems: 16.9 passengers per hour
> Avg. age of fleet: 7.9 years
> Modes of transit: Bus, commuter bus, demand response
[in-text-ad-2]
21. Tacoma, WA
> Commuters using public transit: 6.5%
> Ridership, all systems: 10.2 passengers per hour
> Avg. age of fleet: 4.4 years
> Modes of transit: Bus, demand response, ferryboat, vanpool
20. Ames, IA
> Commuters using public transit: 7.9%
> Ridership, all systems: 38.3 passengers per hour
> Avg. age of fleet: 11.5 years
> Modes of transit: Bus
[in-text-ad]
19. Bridgeport, CT
> Commuters using public transit: 10.4%
> Ridership, all systems: 24.1 passengers per hour
> Avg. age of fleet: 4.3 years
> Modes of transit: Bus, demand response
18. Long Beach, NY
> Commuters using public transit: 20.3%
> Ridership, all systems: 5.8 passengers per hour
> Avg. age of fleet: 7.1 years
> Modes of transit: Bus, demand response
17. Providence, RI
> Commuters using public transit: 5.4%
> Ridership, all systems: 15.7 passengers per hour
> Avg. age of fleet: 5.4 years
> Modes of transit: Bus, demand response, ferryboat, vanpool
[in-text-ad-2]
16. Chapel Hill, NC
> Commuters using public transit: 8.9%
> Ridership, all systems: 30.5 passengers per hour
> Avg. age of fleet: 5.4 years
> Modes of transit: Bus, demand response
15. Woods Hole, MA
> Commuters using public transit: 6.9%
> Ridership, all systems: 36.3 passengers per hour
> Avg. age of fleet: 7.2 years
> Modes of transit: Bus, ferryboat
[in-text-ad]
14. Albany, NY
> Commuters using public transit: 13.6%
> Ridership, all systems: 18.3 passengers per hour
> Avg. age of fleet: 6.0 years
> Modes of transit: Bus, commuter bus, demand response, vanpool
13. Davis, CA
> Commuters using public transit: 7.7%
> Ridership, all systems: 42.5 passengers per hour
> Avg. age of fleet: 8.8 years
> Modes of transit: Bus, demand response
12. Blacksburg, VA
> Commuters using public transit: 6.1%
> Ridership, all systems: 34.8 passengers per hour
> Avg. age of fleet: 5.8 years
> Modes of transit: Bus, demand response
[in-text-ad-2]
11. Breckenridge, CO
> Commuters using public transit: 20.7%
> Ridership, all systems: 18.5 passengers per hour
> Avg. age of fleet: 6.6 years
> Modes of transit: Bus, commuter bus, demand response
10. Vail, CO
> Commuters using public transit: 10.8%
> Ridership, all systems: 33.2 passengers per hour
> Avg. age of fleet: 3.2 years
> Modes of transit: Bus, demand response
[in-text-ad]
9. Urbana, IL
> Commuters using public transit: 11.3%
> Ridership, all systems: 27.3 passengers per hour
> Avg. age of fleet: 6.6 years
> Modes of transit: Bus, demand response
8. Ann Arbor, MI
> Commuters using public transit: 9.4%
> Ridership, all systems: 20.0 passengers per hour
> Avg. age of fleet: 3.6 years
> Modes of transit: Bus, commuter bus, demand response, vanpool
7. Rockville, MD
> Commuters using public transit: 17.3%
> Ridership, all systems: 18.4 passengers per hour
> Avg. age of fleet: 4.6 years
> Modes of transit: Bus, demand response
[in-text-ad-2]
6. State College, PA
> Commuters using public transit: 12.2%
> Ridership, all systems: 32.6 passengers per hour
> Avg. age of fleet: 7.0 years
> Modes of transit: Bus, demand response, vanpool
5. Arlington, VA
> Commuters using public transit: 25.3%
> Ridership, all systems: 12.7 passengers per hour
> Avg. age of fleet: 6.6 years
> Modes of transit: Bus, demand response
[in-text-ad]
4. Richmond, VA
> Commuters using public transit: 5.0%
> Ridership, all systems: 13.1 passengers per hour
> Avg. age of fleet: 3.7 years
> Modes of transit: Bus, bus rapid transit, demand response, vanpool
24/7 Wall St.
3. Clemson, SC
> Commuters using public transit: 5.1%
> Ridership, all systems: 16.4 passengers per hour
> Avg. age of fleet: 6.7 years
> Modes of transit: Bus
2. Salt Lake City, UT
> Commuters using public transit: 6.9%
> Ridership, all systems: 12.4 passengers per hour
> Avg. age of fleet: 5.2 years
> Modes of transit: Bus, commuter bus, commuter rail, demand response, light rail, vanpool
[in-text-ad-2]
1. Alexandria, VA
> Commuters using public transit: 18.6%
> Ridership, all systems: 19.6 passengers per hour
> Avg. age of fleet: 7.5 years
> Modes of transit: Bus, commuter rail, demand response
Methodology
To determine the small cities with the best public transportation systems, 24/7 Wall St. reviewed data on ridership and performance for all U.S. transit systems from the Federal Transit Administration’s National Transit Database and the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.
We constructed an index of 10 measures: the number of transit modes available; the number of passengers using the transit system per hour; the annual number of passenger trips per resident; the number of mechanical failures per 100,000 revenue miles; the average age of passenger fleet vehicles; the miles of roadway dedicated to Bus Rapid Transit; bus vehicle miles powered by electric battery as a percentage of all bus vehicle miles; the percentage of workers 16 years and over who commute using public transit; the percentage of workers 16 years and over with a vehicle at home who take public transit; and the Transit Connectivity Index.
Data on commuting characteristics for workers 16 years and over came from the ACS and are five-year estimates for 2020. The Transit Connectivity Index, a custom measure from transportation data provider AllTransit, measures the concentration of buses and trains within a municipality. All other data is from the FTA NTD and is for 2020.
Data was aggregated across all transportation systems within a municipality, and was weighted equally in the index. Only places with fewer than 250,000 residents where at least 5% of workers 16 years and over commute using public transportation were considered.
Get Ready To Retire (Sponsored)
Start by taking a quick retirement quiz from SmartAsset that will match you with up to 3 financial advisors that serve your area and beyond in 5 minutes, or less.
Each advisor has been vetted by SmartAsset and is held to a fiduciary standard to act in your best interests.
Here’s how it works:
1. Answer SmartAsset advisor match quiz
2. Review your pre-screened matches at your leisure. Check out the advisors’ profiles.
3. Speak with advisors at no cost to you. Have an introductory call on the phone or introduction in person and choose whom to work with in the future
Get started right here.
Thank you for reading! Have some feedback for us?
Contact the 24/7 Wall St. editorial team.
Latest from 24/7
