Many Americans have given up on big city life, opting instead for smaller communities, city-adjacent suburbs, or small rural towns, according to U.S. Census Bureau data from July 2020 to July 2021. (Here are the metro areas with the biggest pandemic population increase.)
To identify cities that lost the most residents, 24/7 Wall St. reviewed metropolitan area population data from the Census Bureau’s Vintage 2021 estimates of population and components of change. Metro areas were ranked by the percent change in population from July 1, 2020 to July 1, 2021, due to migration alone.
In that period of time, metropolitan areas centered around New York City, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Chicago lost a combined 825,998 people due to net domestic migration. Several metro areas with populations of over 1 million people, including San Diego, Boston, Washington D.C., and Miami each lost tens of thousands of residents in that 12-month period.
While the pandemic played a significant role in this, driving many Americans toward smaller, less densely-populated areas, some of the internal migration trends preceded the COVID-19 outbreak. Years of soaring housing costs have pushed many people to leave expensive cities for lower-cost parts of the country. Unfortunately for many potential home buyers, as a result of this trend, home prices have soared in smaller cities, too, according to a recent analysis from Moody’s Analytics. (Here are the most popular cities for homebuyers.)
By far, California has been most affected by this exodus. Eleven of the 50 metropolitan areas that experienced the biggest drops in local populations were in the Golden State. The San Jose and San Francisco metro areas lost 2.5% and 2.6% of their populations, respectively, in the 12 months to July 2021. Smaller California cities like Napa and Salinas also experienced significant population declines due to more people moving out of these areas than moving in.
It makes sense that California, the nation’s largest state by economic clout and population size, would be most affected by population shifts. But Texas, the country’s second-largest state and economy, has been far less impacted. Only four Texas cities — San Angelo, Laredo, Midland, and Odessa — experienced significant drops to their populations due to domestic migration.
Here are the cities that lost the most population during the pandemic
50. Boulder, CO
> Pct. change due to migration, 2020 to 2021: -0.4%
> Net domestic migration, 2020 to 2021: -1,604
> Net international migration, 2020 to 2021: +191
> Total population, 2021: 329,543
[in-text-ad]
49. Springfield, IL
> Pct. change due to migration, 2020 to 2021: -0.4%
> Net domestic migration, 2020 to 2021: -993
> Net international migration, 2020 to 2021: +87
> Total population, 2021: 206,898
48. Alexandria, LA
> Pct. change due to migration, 2020 to 2021: -0.4%
> Net domestic migration, 2020 to 2021: -706
> Net international migration, 2020 to 2021: +41
> Total population, 2021: 150,890
47. Kankakee, IL
> Pct. change due to migration, 2020 to 2021: -0.5%
> Net domestic migration, 2020 to 2021: -515
> Net international migration, 2020 to 2021: +24
> Total population, 2021: 106,601
[in-text-ad-2]
46. Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard, WA
> Pct. change due to migration, 2020 to 2021: -0.5%
> Net domestic migration, 2020 to 2021: -1,331
> Net international migration, 2020 to 2021: +42
> Total population, 2021: 274,314
45. Milwaukee-Waukesha, WI
> Pct. change due to migration, 2020 to 2021: -0.5%
> Net domestic migration, 2020 to 2021: -8,780
> Net international migration, 2020 to 2021: +938
> Total population, 2021: 1,566,487
[in-text-ad]
44. St Joseph, MO-KS
> Pct. change due to migration, 2020 to 2021: -0.5%
> Net domestic migration, 2020 to 2021: -670
> Net international migration, 2020 to 2021: +45
> Total population, 2021: 120,424
43. Yakima, WA
> Pct. change due to migration, 2020 to 2021: -0.5%
> Net domestic migration, 2020 to 2021: -1,591
> Net international migration, 2020 to 2021: +264
> Total population, 2021: 256,035
42. Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA
> Pct. change due to migration, 2020 to 2021: -0.5%
> Net domestic migration, 2020 to 2021: -4,278
> Net international migration, 2020 to 2021: -176
> Total population, 2021: 839,784
[in-text-ad-2]
41. Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL
> Pct. change due to migration, 2020 to 2021: -0.5%
> Net domestic migration, 2020 to 2021: -55,305
> Net international migration, 2020 to 2021: +22,764
> Total population, 2021: 6,091,747
40. Dubuque, IA
> Pct. change due to migration, 2020 to 2021: -0.5%
> Net domestic migration, 2020 to 2021: -601
> Net international migration, 2020 to 2021: +71
> Total population, 2021: 98,718
[in-text-ad]
39. Vallejo, CA
> Pct. change due to migration, 2020 to 2021: -0.5%
> Net domestic migration, 2020 to 2021: -2,495
> Net international migration, 2020 to 2021: +73
> Total population, 2021: 451,716
38. Rockford, IL
> Pct. change due to migration, 2020 to 2021: -0.5%
> Net domestic migration, 2020 to 2021: -1,933
> Net international migration, 2020 to 2021: +105
> Total population, 2021: 336,278
37. Peoria, IL
> Pct. change due to migration, 2020 to 2021: -0.6%
> Net domestic migration, 2020 to 2021: -2,417
> Net international migration, 2020 to 2021: +122
> Total population, 2021: 398,224
[in-text-ad-2]
36. Elmira, NY
> Pct. change due to migration, 2020 to 2021: -0.6%
> Net domestic migration, 2020 to 2021: -502
> Net international migration, 2020 to 2021: +11
> Total population, 2021: 83,045
35. Columbus, GA-AL
> Pct. change due to migration, 2020 to 2021: -0.6%
> Net domestic migration, 2020 to 2021: -2,138
> Net international migration, 2020 to 2021: +176
> Total population, 2021: 327,536
[in-text-ad]
34. Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA
> Pct. change due to migration, 2020 to 2021: -0.6%
> Net domestic migration, 2020 to 2021: -31,489
> Net international migration, 2020 to 2021: +7,320
> Total population, 2021: 4,011,553
33. Jackson, MS
> Pct. change due to migration, 2020 to 2021: -0.6%
> Net domestic migration, 2020 to 2021: -3,656
> Net international migration, 2020 to 2021: +85
> Total population, 2021: 587,202
32. Sioux City, IA-NE-SD
> Pct. change due to migration, 2020 to 2021: -0.6%
> Net domestic migration, 2020 to 2021: -1,079
> Net international migration, 2020 to 2021: +156
> Total population, 2021: 149,265
[in-text-ad-2]
31. Pine Bluff, AR
> Pct. change due to migration, 2020 to 2021: -0.6%
> Net domestic migration, 2020 to 2021: -582
> Net international migration, 2020 to 2021: +41
> Total population, 2021: 86,412
30. San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad, CA
> Pct. change due to migration, 2020 to 2021: -0.7%
> Net domestic migration, 2020 to 2021: -22,867
> Net international migration, 2020 to 2021: +718
> Total population, 2021: 3,286,069
[in-text-ad]
29. New Orleans-Metairie, LA
> Pct. change due to migration, 2020 to 2021: -0.7%
> Net domestic migration, 2020 to 2021: -9,824
> Net international migration, 2020 to 2021: +1,241
> Total population, 2021: 1,261,726
28. Monroe, LA
> Pct. change due to migration, 2020 to 2021: -0.7%
> Net domestic migration, 2020 to 2021: -1,456
> Net international migration, 2020 to 2021: +47
> Total population, 2021: 204,884
27. Chico, CA
> Pct. change due to migration, 2020 to 2021: -0.7%
> Net domestic migration, 2020 to 2021: -1,453
> Net international migration, 2020 to 2021: +14
> Total population, 2021: 208,309
[in-text-ad-2]
26. Ann Arbor, MI
> Pct. change due to migration, 2020 to 2021: -0.7%
> Net domestic migration, 2020 to 2021: -3,019
> Net international migration, 2020 to 2021: +375
> Total population, 2021: 369,390
25. San Angelo, TX
> Pct. change due to migration, 2020 to 2021: -0.7%
> Net domestic migration, 2020 to 2021: -886
> Net international migration, 2020 to 2021: -4
> Total population, 2021: 122,344
[in-text-ad]
24. Santa Maria-Santa Barbara, CA
> Pct. change due to migration, 2020 to 2021: -0.7%
> Net domestic migration, 2020 to 2021: -3,418
> Net international migration, 2020 to 2021: +91
> Total population, 2021: 446,475
23. Danville, IL
> Pct. change due to migration, 2020 to 2021: -0.8%
> Net domestic migration, 2020 to 2021: -571
> Net international migration, 2020 to 2021: +12
> Total population, 2021: 73,095
22. Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH
> Pct. change due to migration, 2020 to 2021: -0.8%
> Net domestic migration, 2020 to 2021: -48,040
> Net international migration, 2020 to 2021: +10,505
> Total population, 2021: 4,899,932
[in-text-ad-2]
21. Laredo, TX
> Pct. change due to migration, 2020 to 2021: -0.8%
> Net domestic migration, 2020 to 2021: -2,241
> Net international migration, 2020 to 2021: +155
> Total population, 2021: 267,945
20. Shreveport-Bossier City, LA
> Pct. change due to migration, 2020 to 2021: -0.8%
> Net domestic migration, 2020 to 2021: -3,298
> Net international migration, 2020 to 2021: +118
> Total population, 2021: 389,155
[in-text-ad]
19. Casper, WY
> Pct. change due to migration, 2020 to 2021: -0.8%
> Net domestic migration, 2020 to 2021: -655
> Net international migration, 2020 to 2021: +5
> Total population, 2021: 79,555
18. Salinas, CA
> Pct. change due to migration, 2020 to 2021: -0.8%
> Net domestic migration, 2020 to 2021: -3,563
> Net international migration, 2020 to 2021: -120
> Total population, 2021: 437,325
17. Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV
> Pct. change due to migration, 2020 to 2021: -0.8%
> Net domestic migration, 2020 to 2021: -66,811
> Net international migration, 2020 to 2021: +12,600
> Total population, 2021: 6,356,434
[in-text-ad-2]
16. Grand Forks, ND-MN
> Pct. change due to migration, 2020 to 2021: -0.9%
> Net domestic migration, 2020 to 2021: -944
> Net international migration, 2020 to 2021: +50
> Total population, 2021: 103,462
15. Napa, CA
> Pct. change due to migration, 2020 to 2021: -0.9%
> Net domestic migration, 2020 to 2021: -1,196
> Net international migration, 2020 to 2021: -26
> Total population, 2021: 136,207
[in-text-ad]
14. Manhattan, KS
> Pct. change due to migration, 2020 to 2021: -0.9%
> Net domestic migration, 2020 to 2021: -1,306
> Net international migration, 2020 to 2021: +63
> Total population, 2021: 133,932
13. Decatur, IL
> Pct. change due to migration, 2020 to 2021: -0.9%
> Net domestic migration, 2020 to 2021: -1,002
> Net international migration, 2020 to 2021: +26
> Total population, 2021: 102,432
12. Santa Cruz-Watsonville, CA
> Pct. change due to migration, 2020 to 2021: -1.0%
> Net domestic migration, 2020 to 2021: -2,596
> Net international migration, 2020 to 2021: -6
> Total population, 2021: 267,792
[in-text-ad-2]
11. Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN-WI
> Pct. change due to migration, 2020 to 2021: -1.1%
> Net domestic migration, 2020 to 2021: -106,897
> Net international migration, 2020 to 2021: +4,284
> Total population, 2021: 9,509,934
10. Enid, OK
> Pct. change due to migration, 2020 to 2021: -1.1%
> Net domestic migration, 2020 to 2021: -756
> Net international migration, 2020 to 2021: +65
> Total population, 2021: 61,926
[in-text-ad]
9. Grand Island, NE
> Pct. change due to migration, 2020 to 2021: -1.1%
> Net domestic migration, 2020 to 2021: -947
> Net international migration, 2020 to 2021: +93
> Total population, 2021: 76,175
8. Urban Honolulu, HI
> Pct. change due to migration, 2020 to 2021: -1.4%
> Net domestic migration, 2020 to 2021: -14,338
> Net international migration, 2020 to 2021: +652
> Total population, 2021: 1,000,890
7. Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA
> Pct. change due to migration, 2020 to 2021: -1.5%
> Net domestic migration, 2020 to 2021: -204,776
> Net international migration, 2020 to 2021: +5,237
> Total population, 2021: 12,997,353
[in-text-ad-2]
6. New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ-PA
> Pct. change due to migration, 2020 to 2021: -1.8%
> Net domestic migration, 2020 to 2021: -385,455
> Net international migration, 2020 to 2021: +23,681
> Total population, 2021: 19,768,458
5. Midland, TX
> Pct. change due to migration, 2020 to 2021: -2.1%
> Net domestic migration, 2020 to 2021: -3,913
> Net international migration, 2020 to 2021: +150
> Total population, 2021: 173,180
[in-text-ad]
4. San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA
> Pct. change due to migration, 2020 to 2021: -2.5%
> Net domestic migration, 2020 to 2021: -52,932
> Net international migration, 2020 to 2021: +3,520
> Total population, 2021: 1,952,185
3. San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley, CA
> Pct. change due to migration, 2020 to 2021: -2.6%
> Net domestic migration, 2020 to 2021: -128,870
> Net international migration, 2020 to 2021: +4,985
> Total population, 2021: 4,623,264
2. Odessa, TX
> Pct. change due to migration, 2020 to 2021: -3.6%
> Net domestic migration, 2020 to 2021: -6,012
> Net international migration, 2020 to 2021: +134
> Total population, 2021: 161,091
[in-text-ad-2]
1. Lake Charles, LA
> Pct. change due to migration, 2020 to 2021: -5.3%
> Net domestic migration, 2020 to 2021: -11,914
> Net international migration, 2020 to 2021: +90
> Total population, 2021: 210,362
Is Your Money Earning the Best Possible Rate? (Sponsor)
Let’s face it: If your money is just sitting in a checking account, you’re losing value every single day. With most checking accounts offering little to no interest, the cash you worked so hard to save is gradually being eroded by inflation.
However, by moving that money into a high-yield savings account, you can put your cash to work, growing steadily with little to no effort on your part. In just a few clicks, you can set up a high-yield savings account and start earning interest immediately.
There are plenty of reputable banks and online platforms that offer competitive rates, and many of them come with zero fees and no minimum balance requirements. Click here to see if you’re earning the best possible rate on your money!
Thank you for reading! Have some feedback for us?
Contact the 24/7 Wall St. editorial team.