The drone of lawn mowers heralds the arrival of better weather, longer days, and outside activities like picnics and barbecuing. But it also means the advent of summer allergies, and for many Americans, the uptick in allergen severity can keep them inside at a time when the great outdoors beckons. (Every season brings its issues. Here are the cities where people struggle the most with fall allergies.)
In some parts of the nation, allergies are more problematic than others, and one of the most common warm-weather allergies is to grass. Sufferers endure runny noses, itchy eyes, and other symptoms, and those with asthma may find their condition worsening. (Here are 16 symptoms you may not know are allergic reactions.)
To identify the 50 worst cities or metropolitan areas for grass allergies, 24/7 Tempo reviewed the 2022’s Worst Cities for Grass Allergies This Summer published by lawn care services company Lawn Love. Lawn Love ranked 125 metropolitan areas, assigning each an overall score out of 100 points – a weighted average of metrics that measure allergy risk, allergen severity, and quality of detection and treatment. The site sourced data from the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology; Lawn Love; Pollen.com; and Urban Adaptation Assessment.
Click here to see the worst cities for people with grass allergies
Click here to see our detailed methodology
Northeasterners are most in need of stocking up on allergy meds. Five urban complexes – Lancaster, Pennsylvania.; Hartford-East Hartford-Middletown, Connecticut; Albany-Schenectady-Troy, New York; Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, in Pennsylvania and New Jersey; and Buffalo-Cheektowaga, New York – will be the worst areas overall for grass allergy sufferers this season. Eight of the 10 worst metro areas, in fact, are in New England and Mid-Atlantic states.
50. San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad, CA
> Overall score (out of 100): 52.25
> Allergy risk rank (out of 125): 64
> Allergen severity rank (out of 125): 33
> Detection and treatment rank (out of 125): 86
> Population: 3,323,970
[in-text-ad]
49. Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA
> Overall score (out of 100): 52.56
> Allergy risk rank (out of 125): 86
> Allergen severity rank (out of 125): 21
> Detection and treatment rank (out of 125): 70
> Population: 4,600,396
48. McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX
> Overall score (out of 100): 52.87
> Allergy risk rank (out of 125): 8
> Allergen severity rank (out of 125): 121
> Detection and treatment rank (out of 125): 1
> Population: 861,137
47. Portland-South Portland, ME
> Overall score (out of 100): 52.93
> Allergy risk rank (out of 125): 87
> Allergen severity rank (out of 125): 20
> Detection and treatment rank (out of 125): 58
> Population: 536,314
[in-text-ad-2]
46. San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX
> Overall score (out of 100): 52.99
> Allergy risk rank (out of 125): 12
> Allergen severity rank (out of 125): 104
> Detection and treatment rank (out of 125): 34
> Population: 2,510,211
45. Kansas City, MO-KS
> Overall score (out of 100): 53.19
> Allergy risk rank (out of 125): 58
> Allergen severity rank (out of 125): 30
> Detection and treatment rank (out of 125): 100
> Population: 2,144,129
[in-text-ad]
44. Shreveport-Bossier City, LA
> Overall score (out of 100): 53.23
> Allergy risk rank (out of 125): 20
> Allergen severity rank (out of 125): 60
> Detection and treatment rank (out of 125): 121
> Population: 397,590
43. Bakersfield, CA
> Overall score (out of 100): 53.40
> Allergy risk rank (out of 125): 49
> Allergen severity rank (out of 125): 45
> Detection and treatment rank (out of 125): 68
> Population: 892,458
42. San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA
> Overall score (out of 100): 53.48
> Allergy risk rank (out of 125): 22
> Allergen severity rank (out of 125): 70
> Detection and treatment rank (out of 125): 99
> Population: 1,985,926
[in-text-ad-2]
41. Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX
> Overall score (out of 100): 53.58
> Allergy risk rank (out of 125): 14
> Allergen severity rank (out of 125): 99
> Detection and treatment rank (out of 125): 41
> Population: 6,979,613
40. New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ-PA
> Overall score (out of 100): 54.21
> Allergy risk rank (out of 125): 23
> Allergen severity rank (out of 125): 67
> Detection and treatment rank (out of 125): 73
> Population: 19,261,570
[in-text-ad]
39. Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN
> Overall score (out of 100): 54.48
> Allergy risk rank (out of 125): 32
> Allergen severity rank (out of 125): 62
> Detection and treatment rank (out of 125): 62
> Population: 2,214,265
38. Greenville-Anderson, SC
> Overall score (out of 100): 54.84
> Allergy risk rank (out of 125): 28
> Allergen severity rank (out of 125): 71
> Detection and treatment rank (out of 125): 49
> Population: 908,680
37. Corpus Christi, TX
> Overall score (out of 100): 55.08
> Allergy risk rank (out of 125): 1
> Allergen severity rank (out of 125): 120
> Detection and treatment rank (out of 125): 10
> Population: 429,120
[in-text-ad-2]
36. Stockton, CA
> Overall score (out of 100): 55.68
> Allergy risk rank (out of 125): 13
> Allergen severity rank (out of 125): 97
> Detection and treatment rank (out of 125): 14
> Population: 751,615
35. Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD
> Overall score (out of 100): 55.73
> Allergy risk rank (out of 125): 9
> Allergen severity rank (out of 125): 86
> Detection and treatment rank (out of 125): 109
> Population: 2,800,427
[in-text-ad]
34. San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley, CA
> Overall score (out of 100): 55.73
> Allergy risk rank (out of 125): 30
> Allergen severity rank (out of 125): 50
> Detection and treatment rank (out of 125): 94
> Population: 4,709,220
24/7 Wall St.
33. Akron, OH
> Overall score (out of 100): 55.94
> Allergy risk rank (out of 125): 53
> Allergen severity rank (out of 125): 22
> Detection and treatment rank (out of 125): 85
> Population: 703,286
32. Pittsburgh, PA
> Overall score (out of 100): 56.07
> Allergy risk rank (out of 125): 55
> Allergen severity rank (out of 125): 17
> Detection and treatment rank (out of 125): 96
> Population: 2,324,447
[in-text-ad-2]
31. Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN-WI
> Overall score (out of 100): 56.17
> Allergy risk rank (out of 125): 81
> Allergen severity rank (out of 125): 5
> Detection and treatment rank (out of 125): 113
> Population: 9,478,801
30. Spokane-Spokane Valley, WA
> Overall score (out of 100): 56.26
> Allergy risk rank (out of 125): 25
> Allergen severity rank (out of 125): 53
> Detection and treatment rank (out of 125): 91
> Population: 558,635
[in-text-ad]
29. Boise City, ID
> Overall score (out of 100): 56.38
> Allergy risk rank (out of 125): 27
> Allergen severity rank (out of 125): 59
> Detection and treatment rank (out of 125): 55
> Population: 730,483
24/7 Wall St.
28. Manchester-Nashua, NH
> Overall score (out of 100): 56.78
> Allergy risk rank (out of 125): 47
> Allergen severity rank (out of 125): 16
> Detection and treatment rank (out of 125): 118
> Population: 415,305
27. Scranton-Wilkes-Barre, PA
> Overall score (out of 100): 56.99
> Allergy risk rank (out of 125): 60
> Allergen severity rank (out of 125): 28
> Detection and treatment rank (out of 125): 46
> Population: 554,787
[in-text-ad-2]
26. Reading, PA
> Overall score (out of 100): 57.45
> Allergy risk rank (out of 125): 83
> Allergen severity rank (out of 125): 10
> Detection and treatment rank (out of 125): 67
> Population: 419,062
25. Knoxville, TN
> Overall score (out of 100): 57.49
> Allergy risk rank (out of 125): 52
> Allergen severity rank (out of 125): 12
> Detection and treatment rank (out of 125): 106
> Population: 861,872
[in-text-ad]
24. Memphis, TN-MS-AR
> Overall score (out of 100): 57.65
> Allergy risk rank (out of 125): 34
> Allergen severity rank (out of 125): 44
> Detection and treatment rank (out of 125): 53
> Population: 1,343,150
24/7 Wall St.
23. Providence-Warwick, RI-MA
> Overall score (out of 100): 58.43
> Allergy risk rank (out of 125): 46
> Allergen severity rank (out of 125): 23
> Detection and treatment rank (out of 125): 65
> Population: 1,621,099
22. Columbus, OH
> Overall score (out of 100): 58.51
> Allergy risk rank (out of 125): 37
> Allergen severity rank (out of 125): 25
> Detection and treatment rank (out of 125): 93
> Population: 2,101,543
[in-text-ad-2]
21. Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA
> Overall score (out of 100): 58.61
> Allergy risk rank (out of 125): 31
> Allergen severity rank (out of 125): 37
> Detection and treatment rank (out of 125): 74
> Population: 574,691
20. Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH
> Overall score (out of 100): 59.55
> Allergy risk rank (out of 125): 62
> Allergen severity rank (out of 125): 3
> Detection and treatment rank (out of 125): 112
> Population: 4,854,808
[in-text-ad]
19. Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA
> Overall score (out of 100): 59.65
> Allergy risk rank (out of 125): 15
> Allergen severity rank (out of 125): 51
> Detection and treatment rank (out of 125): 102
> Population: 2,338,866
24/7 Wall St.
18. Modesto, CA
> Overall score (out of 100): 60.02
> Allergy risk rank (out of 125): 7
> Allergen severity rank (out of 125): 92
> Detection and treatment rank (out of 125): 21
> Population: 546,235
17. Cleveland-Elyria, OH
> Overall score (out of 100): 60.43
> Allergy risk rank (out of 125): 40
> Allergen severity rank (out of 125): 10
> Detection and treatment rank (out of 125): 104
> Population: 2,053,137
[in-text-ad-2]
16. Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC
> Overall score (out of 100): 60.62
> Allergy risk rank (out of 125): 5
> Allergen severity rank (out of 125): 81
> Detection and treatment rank (out of 125): 63
> Population: 1,768,956
15. Worcester, MA-CT
> Overall score (out of 100): 61.03
> Allergy risk rank (out of 125): 59
> Allergen severity rank (out of 125): 4
> Detection and treatment rank (out of 125): 81
> Population: 943,312
[in-text-ad]
14. Toledo, OH
> Overall score (out of 100): 61.60
> Allergy risk rank (out of 125): 29
> Allergen severity rank (out of 125): 26
> Detection and treatment rank (out of 125): 54
> Population: 643,724
24/7 Wall St.
13. Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV
> Overall score (out of 100): 62.13
> Allergy risk rank (out of 125): 11
> Allergen severity rank (out of 125): 49
> Detection and treatment rank (out of 125): 77
> Population: 6,250,309
12. Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT
> Overall score (out of 100): 62.21
> Allergy risk rank (out of 125): 41
> Allergen severity rank (out of 125): 2
> Detection and treatment rank (out of 125): 122
> Population: 944,306
[in-text-ad-2]
11. Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA
> Overall score (out of 100): 62.39
> Allergy risk rank (out of 125): 3
> Allergen severity rank (out of 125): 75
> Detection and treatment rank (out of 125): 83
> Population: 2,472,774
10. Wichita, KS
> Overall score (out of 100): 63.58
> Allergy risk rank (out of 125): 6
> Allergen severity rank (out of 125): 80
> Detection and treatment rank (out of 125): 13
> Population: 639,668
[in-text-ad]
9. New Haven-Milford, CT
> Overall score (out of 100): 63.90
> Allergy risk rank (out of 125): 66
> Allergen severity rank (out of 125): 1
> Detection and treatment rank (out of 125): 98
> Population: 855,733
8. Syracuse, NY
> Overall score (out of 100): 64.50
> Allergy risk rank (out of 125): 33
> Allergen severity rank (out of 125): 9
> Detection and treatment rank (out of 125): 58
> Population: 650,211
7. Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD
> Overall score (out of 100): 64.81
> Allergy risk rank (out of 125): 21
> Allergen severity rank (out of 125): 8
> Detection and treatment rank (out of 125): 107
> Population: 6,092,403
[in-text-ad-2]
6. Santa Rosa-Petaluma, CA
> Overall score (out of 100): 64.87
> Allergy risk rank (out of 125): 24
> Allergen severity rank (out of 125): 7
> Detection and treatment rank (out of 125): 103
> Population: 496,801
5. Buffalo-Cheektowaga, NY
> Overall score (out of 100): 65.35
> Allergy risk rank (out of 125): 18
> Allergen severity rank (out of 125): 15
> Detection and treatment rank (out of 125): 76
> Population: 1,129,018
[in-text-ad]
4. Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ
> Overall score (out of 100): 66.35
> Allergy risk rank (out of 125): 16
> Allergen severity rank (out of 125): 13
> Detection and treatment rank (out of 125): 101
> Population: 841,265
3. Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY
> Overall score (out of 100): 69.58
> Allergy risk rank (out of 125): 2
> Allergen severity rank (out of 125): 19
> Detection and treatment rank (out of 125): 117
> Population: 880,766
2. Hartford-East Hartford-Middletown, CT
> Overall score (out of 100): 69.95
> Allergy risk rank (out of 125): 10
> Allergen severity rank (out of 125): 14
> Detection and treatment rank (out of 125): 69
> Population: 1,205,842
[in-text-ad-2]
1. Lancaster, PA
> Overall score (out of 100): 70.13
> Allergy risk rank (out of 125): 19
> Allergen severity rank (out of 125): 6
> Detection and treatment rank (out of 125): 65
> Population: 543,050
Methodology
To identify the 50 worst cities or metropolitan areas for grass allergies, 24/7 Tempo reviewed the 2022’s Worst Cities for Grass Allergies This Summer published by lawn care services company Lawn Love. Lawn Love ranked 125 metropolitan areas, assigning each an overall score out of 100 points – a weighted average of metrics that measure allergy risk, allergen severity, and quality of detection and treatment. The site sourced data from the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology; Lawn Love; Pollen.com; and Urban Adaptation Assessment.
Allergy risk includes average forecast grass pollen index (May-August 2022), historical average mow frequency, and average climate change score. Allergen severity includes average number of significant grass allergens, average number of overall grass allergens, and average number of mild grass allergens. Detection and treatment includes the number of available allergy tests for grass allergen and the population of allergists and immunologists per 100,000 residents.
Lawn Love “selected the metro areas based on their need for lawn mowing and therefore residents’ susceptibility to grass allergies.” Data was collected for each “principal city” that makes up the MSA, with some data based on internal customer data for the period between May and August 2021. Population data came from the U.S. Census Bureau 2020 American Community Survey and is a five-year average.
Essential Tips for Investing (Sponsored)
A financial advisor can help you understand the advantages and disadvantages of investment properties. Finding a qualified financial advisor doesn’t have to be hard. SmartAsset’s free tool matches you with up to three financial advisors who serve your area, and you can interview your advisor matches at no cost to decide which one is right for you. If you’re ready to find an advisor who can help you achieve your financial goals, get started now.
Investing in real estate can diversify your portfolio. But expanding your horizons may add additional costs. If you’re an investor looking to minimize expenses, consider checking out online brokerages. They often offer low investment fees, helping you maximize your profit.
Thank you for reading! Have some feedback for us?
Contact the 24/7 Wall St. editorial team.
Latest from 24/7
