Nearly 80% of the 11 million single-parent families are headed by mothers, a statistic that underscores how disproportionately the responsibility of child-rearing falls on women. But the U.S. also has about two million single fathers, according to the latest data from the U.S. Census Bureau.
For both, single parenthood in America comes with significant challenges, especially when it comes to access to affordable child-care services necessary to allow parents access to more working hours and higher incomes. (These are the cities with the cheapest child care.)
Work-life balance in America, measured in part by the availability of paid family and sick leave, is also hugely lacking in the country. The U.S. is the only developed country in the world that mandates no paid sick or parental leave.
Considering America’s failures in broadly providing these kinds of services and benefits, some U.S. cities do relatively better than others when it comes to parental support. For a variety of reasons, these are the best and worst states to raise a family.
To identify the 30 best cities for single dads in the U.S. in 2022, 24/7 Tempo reviewed a ranking created by LawnStarter, a lawn-care start-up that conducts research into city and state amenities. The site used data from some 20 government and non-government sources to rank the 200 largest U.S. cities across 36 differently weighted metrics in six main categories: affordability, child care, health and education, home and outdoors, work-life balance, and community support. (Our edited data omits scores for health and education and home and outdoors, but they are included in computations of the final score.)
Click here to see the best cities for single dads in 2022
The top 30 best cities for single fathers overall are Naperville, Illinois; Overland Park, Kansas; and Sioux Falls, South Dakota. Not one of the 30, however, scores among the top 30 in every individual metrics. Napierville makes it for affordability and community support; Overland Park scores highly only for affordability; Sioux Falls places well only for affordability and child care.
30. (tie) Baton Rouge, LA
> Affordability rank: 129/200
> Child care rank: 14/200
> Work-life balance rank: 77/200
> Community support rank: 178/200
> Overall score: 52.74/100
[in-text-ad]
29. (tie) Des Moines, IA
> Affordability rank: 37/200
> Child care rank: 40/200
> Work-life balance rank: 141/200
> Community support rank: 102/200
> Overall score: 52.74/100
28. (tie) Gilbert, AZ
> Affordability rank: 9/200
> Child care rank: 121/200
> Work-life balance rank: 100/200
> Community support rank: 40/200
> Overall score: 52.74/100
27. Sunnyvale, CA
> Affordability rank: 12/200
> Child care rank: 198/200
> Work-life balance rank: 14/200
> Community support rank: 110/200
> Overall score: 52.98/100
[in-text-ad-2]
26. Chandler, AZ
> Affordability rank: 13/200
> Child care rank: 123/200
> Work-life balance rank: 88/200
> Community support rank: 50/200
> Overall score: 53/100
25. Cincinnati, OH
> Affordability rank: 99/200
> Child care rank: 37/200
> Work-life balance rank: 124/200
> Community support rank: 1/200
> Overall score: 53.14/100
[in-text-ad]
24. Fremont, CA
> Affordability rank: 14/200
> Child care rank: 200/200
> Work-life balance rank: 25/200
> Community support rank: 193/200
> Overall score: 53.3/100
23. Seattle, WA
> Affordability rank: 23/200
> Child care rank: 172/200
> Work-life balance rank: 39/200
> Community support rank: 79/200
> Overall score: 53.88/100
22. Buffalo, NY
> Affordability rank: 176/200
> Child care rank: 48/200
> Work-life balance rank: 13/200
> Community support rank: 84/200
> Overall score: 54/100
[in-text-ad-2]
21. Portland, OR
> Affordability rank: 126/200
> Child care rank: 117/200
> Work-life balance rank: 5/200
> Community support rank: 69/200
> Overall score: 54.54/100
20. Eugene, OR
> Affordability rank: 187/200
> Child care rank: 107/200
> Work-life balance rank: 3/200
> Community support rank: 161/200
> Overall score: 54.6/100
[in-text-ad]
19. Huntsville, AL
> Affordability rank: 15/200
> Child care rank: 24/200
> Work-life balance rank: 119/200
> Community support rank: 164/200
> Overall score: 54.76/100
24/7 Wall St.
18. Pittsburgh, PA
> Affordability rank: 63/200
> Child care rank: 85/200
> Work-life balance rank: 127/200
> Community support rank: 51/200
> Overall score: 54.91/100
17. Arlington, VA
> Affordability rank: 16/200
> Child care rank: 146/200
> Work-life balance rank: 140/200
> Community support rank: 103/200
> Overall score: 55.72/100
[in-text-ad-2]
16. Scottsdale, AZ
> Affordability rank: 7/200
> Child care rank: 44/200
> Work-life balance rank: 81/200
> Community support rank: 199/200
> Overall score: 56.35/100
15. Boise City, ID
> Affordability rank: 26/200
> Child care rank: 59/200
> Work-life balance rank: 128/200
> Community support rank: 166/200
> Overall score: 56.39/100
[in-text-ad]
14. Madison, WI
> Affordability rank: 75/200
> Child care rank: 69/200
> Work-life balance rank: 71/200
> Community support rank: 72/200
> Overall score: 56.46/100
24/7 Wall St.
13. Lexington, KY
> Affordability rank: 53/200
> Child care rank: 4/200
> Work-life balance rank: 126/200
> Community support rank: 132/200
> Overall score: 56.52/100
12. Plano, TX
> Affordability rank: 10/200
> Child care rank: 89/200
> Work-life balance rank: 138/200
> Community support rank: 25/200
> Overall score: 56.72/100
[in-text-ad-2]
11. McKinney, TX
> Affordability rank: 8/200
> Child care rank: 83/200
> Work-life balance rank: 177/200
> Community support rank: 158/200
> Overall score: 56.97/100
10. Irvine, CA
> Affordability rank: 27/200
> Child care rank: 167/200
> Work-life balance rank: 9/200
> Community support rank: 37/200
> Overall score: 57.38/100
[in-text-ad]
9. Lincoln, NE
> Affordability rank: 28/200
> Child care rank: 2/200
> Work-life balance rank: 121/200
> Community support rank: 173/200
> Overall score: 57.9/100
8. Omaha, NE
> Affordability rank: 20/200
> Child care rank: 6/200
> Work-life balance rank: 133/200
> Community support rank: 44/200
> Overall score: 58.02/100
7. Bellevue, WA
> Affordability rank: 6/200
> Child care rank: 183/200
> Work-life balance rank: 29/200
> Community support rank: 138/200
> Overall score: 58.13/100
[in-text-ad-2]
6. Frisco, TX
> Affordability rank: 1/200
> Child care rank: 73/200
> Work-life balance rank: 164/200
> Community support rank: 143/200
> Overall score: 58.92/100
5. Cary, NC
> Affordability rank: 3/200
> Child care rank: 104/200
> Work-life balance rank: 75/200
> Community support rank: 26/200
> Overall score: 59.08/100
[in-text-ad]
4. Olathe, KS
> Affordability rank: 5/200
> Child care rank: 67/200
> Work-life balance rank: 136/200
> Community support rank: 147/200
> Overall score: 59.09/100
3. Sioux Falls, SD
> Affordability rank: 11/200
> Child care rank: 1/200
> Work-life balance rank: 142/200
> Community support rank: 114/200
> Overall score: 60.3/100
2. Overland Park, KS
> Affordability rank: 4/200
> Child care rank: 57/200
> Work-life balance rank: 115/200
> Community support rank: 121/200
> Overall score: 63.13/100
[in-text-ad-2]
1. Naperville, IL
> Affordability rank: 2/200
> Child care rank: 63/200
> Work-life balance rank: 95/200
> Community support rank: 28/200
> Overall score: 63.8/100
Is Your Money Earning the Best Possible Rate? (Sponsor)
Let’s face it: If your money is just sitting in a checking account, you’re losing value every single day. With most checking accounts offering little to no interest, the cash you worked so hard to save is gradually being eroded by inflation.
However, by moving that money into a high-yield savings account, you can put your cash to work, growing steadily with little to no effort on your part. In just a few clicks, you can set up a high-yield savings account and start earning interest immediately.
There are plenty of reputable banks and online platforms that offer competitive rates, and many of them come with zero fees and no minimum balance requirements. Click here to see if you’re earning the best possible rate on your money!
Thank you for reading! Have some feedback for us?
Contact the 24/7 Wall St. editorial team.
Latest from 24/7
