Special Report
The Big City Where the Fewest People Rent in Every State
Published:
For the first time in the nation’s history, median monthly rents in the United States crossed the $2,000 mark. According to a report from real estate listing site Redfin, the median rent on all apartments listed nationwide rose 15% compared to a year ago. For those millions of Americans who do not have the stability afforded to them through homeownership, rising rent will take a serious financial toll.
Nationwide, 35.6% of housing units are occupied by renters. In most states, however, there is at least one metropolitan area where renting is relatively uncommon.
To determine the metro area with the lowest rental rate in every state, 24/7 Wall St. reviewed five-year estimates of the share of housing units that are occupied by renters from the U.S. Census Bureau’s 2020 American Community Survey.
Young people are far more likely to rent homes than buy. In a number of metro areas where a relatively low share of housing units are rentals, age appears to be a factor. According to the census, 23.2% of Americans are 18-34 years old. In 41 of the 50 places on this list, that demographic amounts to a smaller share of the population. In The Villages, Florida, which has the lowest rental rate in both the state and the country, 8.6% of the population is 18-34, also the lowest share in the country among metro areas. These are the states where the population has gone up since the pandemic started.
Click here to see the big city where the fewest people rent in every state.
Click here to see our detailed methodology.
Alabama: Daphne-Fairhope-Foley
> Rental occupied housing units: 23.0% (Alabama: 30.8%)
> Median rental cost: $1,032 (Alabama: $811)
> Median home value: $211,600 (Alabama: $149,600)
> Median household income: $61,756 (Alabama: $52,035)
> No. of metros considered in ranking: 12
[in-text-ad]
Alaska: Anchorage
> Rental occupied housing units: 34.4% (Alaska: 35.2%)
> Median rental cost: $1,277 (Alaska: $1,240)
> Median home value: $301,100 (Alaska: $275,600)
> Median household income: $82,890 (Alaska: $77,790)
> No. of metros considered in ranking: 2
24/7 Wall St.
Arizona: Prescott Valley-Prescott
> Rental occupied housing units: 27.4% (Arizona: 34.7%)
> Median rental cost: $982 (Arizona: $1,097)
> Median home value: $273,300 (Arizona: $242,000)
> Median household income: $53,329 (Arizona: $61,529)
> No. of metros considered in ranking: 7
Arkansas: Hot Springs
> Rental occupied housing units: 32.9% (Arkansas: 34.2%)
> Median rental cost: $791 (Arkansas: $760)
> Median home value: $142,100 (Arkansas: $133,600)
> Median household income: $48,150 (Arkansas: $49,475)
> No. of metros considered in ranking: 6
[in-text-ad-2]
California: Madera
> Rental occupied housing units: 34.2% (California: 44.7%)
> Median rental cost: $1,068 (California: $1,586)
> Median home value: $268,500 (California: $538,500)
> Median household income: $61,924 (California: $78,672)
> No. of metros considered in ranking: 26
Colorado: Greeley
> Rental occupied housing units: 25.5% (Colorado: 33.8%)
> Median rental cost: $1,143 (Colorado: $1,335)
> Median home value: $326,100 (Colorado: $369,900)
> Median household income: $74,332 (Colorado: $75,231)
> No. of metros considered in ranking: 7
[in-text-ad]
Connecticut: Norwich-New London
> Rental occupied housing units: 32.9% (Connecticut: 33.9%)
> Median rental cost: $1,144 (Connecticut: $1,201)
> Median home value: $246,800 (Connecticut: $279,700)
> Median household income: $75,831 (Connecticut: $79,855)
> No. of metros considered in ranking: 4
Delaware: Dover*
> Rental occupied housing units: 31.2% (Delaware: 28.6%)
> Median rental cost: $1,110 (Delaware: $1,150)
> Median home value: $226,600 (Delaware: $258,300)
> Median household income: $60,117 (Delaware: $69,110)
> No. of metros considered in ranking: 1
*Because Dover is the only eligible metro in Delaware, it is the metro with the lowest rental rate by default.
Florida: The Villages
> Rental occupied housing units: 11.4% (Florida: 33.8%)
> Median rental cost: $935 (Florida: $1,218)
> Median home value: $267,100 (Florida: $232,000)
> Median household income: $59,618 (Florida: $57,703)
> No. of metros considered in ranking: 22
[in-text-ad-2]
Georgia: Brunswick
> Rental occupied housing units: 30.7% (Georgia: 36.0%)
> Median rental cost: $853 (Georgia: $1,042)
> Median home value: $167,100 (Georgia: $190,200)
> Median household income: $53,541 (Georgia: $61,224)
> No. of metros considered in ranking: 14
Hawaii: Kahului-Wailuku-Lahaina
> Rental occupied housing units: 37.5% (Hawaii: 39.7%)
> Median rental cost: $1,543 (Hawaii: $1,651)
> Median home value: $657,400 (Hawaii: $636,400)
> Median household income: $84,363 (Hawaii: $83,173)
> No. of metros considered in ranking: 2
[in-text-ad]
Idaho: Lewiston
> Rental occupied housing units: 27.3% (Idaho: 29.2%)
> Median rental cost: $762 (Idaho: $887)
> Median home value: $207,200 (Idaho: $235,600)
> Median household income: $55,657 (Idaho: $58,915)
> No. of metros considered in ranking: 6
24/7 Wall St.
Illinois: Peoria
> Rental occupied housing units: 27.9% (Illinois: 33.7%)
> Median rental cost: $776 (Illinois: $1,038)
> Median home value: $133,600 (Illinois: $202,100)
> Median household income: $60,094 (Illinois: $68,428)
> No. of metros considered in ranking: 10
Indiana: Michigan City-La Porte
> Rental occupied housing units: 26.7% (Indiana: 30.5%)
> Median rental cost: $763 (Indiana: $844)
> Median home value: $139,900 (Indiana: $148,900)
> Median household income: $57,010 (Indiana: $58,235)
> No. of metros considered in ranking: 12
[in-text-ad-2]
Iowa: Cedar Rapids
> Rental occupied housing units: 24.7% (Iowa: 28.8%)
> Median rental cost: $768 (Iowa: $806)
> Median home value: $159,800 (Iowa: $153,900)
> Median household income: $66,620 (Iowa: $61,836)
> No. of metros considered in ranking: 8
Kansas: Topeka
> Rental occupied housing units: 30.6% (Kansas: 33.8%)
> Median rental cost: $808 (Kansas: $863)
> Median home value: $137,900 (Kansas: $157,600)
> Median household income: $59,815 (Kansas: $61,091)
> No. of metros considered in ranking: 4
[in-text-ad]
Kentucky: Owensboro
> Rental occupied housing units: 31.5% (Kentucky: 32.4%)
> Median rental cost: $795 (Kentucky: $783)
> Median home value: $139,300 (Kentucky: $147,100)
> Median household income: $54,946 (Kentucky: $52,238)
> No. of metros considered in ranking: 5
24/7 Wall St.
Louisiana: Houma-Thibodaux
> Rental occupied housing units: 26.1% (Louisiana: 33.4%)
> Median rental cost: $842 (Louisiana: $876)
> Median home value: $157,000 (Louisiana: $168,100)
> Median household income: $53,267 (Louisiana: $50,800)
> No. of metros considered in ranking: 9
Maine: Portland-South Portland
> Rental occupied housing units: 27.9% (Maine: 27.1%)
> Median rental cost: $1,115 (Maine: $873)
> Median home value: $273,100 (Maine: $198,000)
> Median household income: $72,552 (Maine: $59,489)
> No. of metros considered in ranking: 3
[in-text-ad-2]
Maryland: Salisbury
> Rental occupied housing units: 25.7% (Maryland: 32.9%)
> Median rental cost: $1,032 (Maryland: $1,415)
> Median home value: $243,900 (Maryland: $325,400)
> Median household income: $62,799 (Maryland: $87,063)
> No. of metros considered in ranking: 5
Massachusetts: Barnstable Town
> Rental occupied housing units: 20.4% (Massachusetts: 37.5%)
> Median rental cost: $1,362 (Massachusetts: $1,336)
> Median home value: $414,000 (Massachusetts: $398,800)
> Median household income: $76,863 (Massachusetts: $84,385)
> No. of metros considered in ranking: 5
[in-text-ad]
Michigan: Monroe
> Rental occupied housing units: 19.4% (Michigan: 28.3%)
> Median rental cost: $870 (Michigan: $892)
> Median home value: $167,400 (Michigan: $162,600)
> Median household income: $65,453 (Michigan: $59,234)
> No. of metros considered in ranking: 14
Minnesota: Rochester
> Rental occupied housing units: 25.0% (Minnesota: 28.1%)
> Median rental cost: $952 (Minnesota: $1,010)
> Median home value: $218,500 (Minnesota: $235,700)
> Median household income: $76,787 (Minnesota: $73,382)
> No. of metros considered in ranking: 5
Mississippi: Jackson
> Rental occupied housing units: 32.4% (Mississippi: 31.2%)
> Median rental cost: $884 (Mississippi: $789)
> Median home value: $148,300 (Mississippi: $125,500)
> Median household income: $53,639 (Mississippi: $46,511)
> No. of metros considered in ranking: 3
[in-text-ad-2]
Missouri: Jefferson City
> Rental occupied housing units: 28.3% (Missouri: 32.9%)
> Median rental cost: $686 (Missouri: $843)
> Median home value: $162,100 (Missouri: $163,600)
> Median household income: $60,586 (Missouri: $57,290)
> No. of metros considered in ranking: 8
Montana: Billings
> Rental occupied housing units: 30.2% (Montana: 31.5%)
> Median rental cost: $901 (Montana: $836)
> Median home value: $240,700 (Montana: $244,900)
> Median household income: $62,722 (Montana: $56,539)
> No. of metros considered in ranking: 3
[in-text-ad]
Nebraska: Omaha-Council Bluffs
> Rental occupied housing units: 34.2% (Nebraska: 33.8%)
> Median rental cost: $952 (Nebraska: $857)
> Median home value: $181,200 (Nebraska: $164,000)
> Median household income: $69,439 (Nebraska: $63,015)
> No. of metros considered in ranking: 3
Nevada: Carson City
> Rental occupied housing units: 41.8% (Nevada: 42.9%)
> Median rental cost: $982 (Nevada: $1,159)
> Median home value: $299,900 (Nevada: $290,200)
> Median household income: $58,305 (Nevada: $62,043)
> No. of metros considered in ranking: 3
New Hampshire: Manchester-Nashua*
> Rental occupied housing units: 34.3% (New Hampshire: 28.8%)
> Median rental cost: $1,217 (New Hampshire: $1,145)
> Median home value: $287,900 (New Hampshire: $272,300)
> Median household income: $82,099 (New Hampshire: $77,923)
> No. of metros considered in ranking: 1
*Because Manchester-Nashua is the only eligible metro in New Hampshire, it is the metro with the lowest rental rate by default.
[in-text-ad-2]
New Jersey: Ocean City
> Rental occupied housing units: 22.0% (New Jersey: 36.0%)
> Median rental cost: $1,176 (New Jersey: $1,368)
> Median home value: $306,200 (New Jersey: $343,500)
> Median household income: $72,385 (New Jersey: $85,245)
> No. of metros considered in ranking: 4
New Mexico: Santa Fe
> Rental occupied housing units: 28.8% (New Mexico: 32.0%)
> Median rental cost: $1,092 (New Mexico: $857)
> Median home value: $294,800 (New Mexico: $175,700)
> Median household income: $60,668 (New Mexico: $51,243)
> No. of metros considered in ranking: 4
[in-text-ad]
New York: Glens Falls
> Rental occupied housing units: 28.4% (New York: 45.9%)
> Median rental cost: $898 (New York: $1,315)
> Median home value: $177,000 (New York: $325,000)
> Median household income: $62,284 (New York: $71,117)
> No. of metros considered in ranking: 13
North Carolina: Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton
> Rental occupied housing units: 26.6% (North Carolina: 34.3%)
> Median rental cost: $708 (North Carolina: $932)
> Median home value: $139,100 (North Carolina: $182,100)
> Median household income: $49,706 (North Carolina: $56,642)
> No. of metros considered in ranking: 15
North Dakota: Bismarck
> Rental occupied housing units: 29.6% (North Dakota: 37.5%)
> Median rental cost: $877 (North Dakota: $828)
> Median home value: $254,900 (North Dakota: $199,900)
> Median household income: $72,886 (North Dakota: $65,315)
> No. of metros considered in ranking: 3
[in-text-ad-2]
Ohio: Youngstown-Warren-Boardman
> Rental occupied housing units: 29.7% (Ohio: 33.7%)
> Median rental cost: $683 (Ohio: $825)
> Median home value: $110,300 (Ohio: $151,400)
> Median household income: $48,020 (Ohio: $58,116)
> No. of metros considered in ranking: 11
Oklahoma: Enid
> Rental occupied housing units: 34.6% (Oklahoma: 33.9%)
> Median rental cost: $814 (Oklahoma: $818)
> Median home value: $119,000 (Oklahoma: $142,400)
> Median household income: $55,435 (Oklahoma: $53,840)
> No. of metros considered in ranking: 4
[in-text-ad]
Oregon: Grants Pass
> Rental occupied housing units: 31.2% (Oregon: 37.2%)
> Median rental cost: $930 (Oregon: $1,173)
> Median home value: $281,500 (Oregon: $336,700)
> Median household income: $47,733 (Oregon: $65,667)
> No. of metros considered in ranking: 8
Pennsylvania: Gettysburg
> Rental occupied housing units: 22.2% (Pennsylvania: 31.0%)
> Median rental cost: $932 (Pennsylvania: $958)
> Median home value: $212,300 (Pennsylvania: $187,500)
> Median household income: $68,411 (Pennsylvania: $63,627)
> No. of metros considered in ranking: 18
Rhode Island: Providence-Warwick*
> Rental occupied housing units: 38.0% (Rhode Island: 38.4%)
> Median rental cost: $993 (Rhode Island: $1,031)
> Median home value: $290,500 (Rhode Island: $276,600)
> Median household income: $70,676 (Rhode Island: $70,305)
> No. of metros considered in ranking: 1
*Because Providence-Warwick is the only eligible metro in Rhode Island, it is the metro with the lowest rental rate by default.
[in-text-ad-2]
South Carolina: Myrtle Beach-Conway-North Myrtle Beach
> Rental occupied housing units: 24.0% (South Carolina: 29.9%)
> Median rental cost: $976 (South Carolina: $918)
> Median home value: $195,700 (South Carolina: $170,100)
> Median household income: $53,832 (South Carolina: $54,864)
> No. of metros considered in ranking: 8
South Dakota: Rapid City
> Rental occupied housing units: 30.0% (South Dakota: 32.0%)
> Median rental cost: $870 (South Dakota: $761)
> Median home value: $199,100 (South Dakota: $174,600)
> Median household income: $59,076 (South Dakota: $59,896)
> No. of metros considered in ranking: 2
[in-text-ad]
Tennessee: Kingsport-Bristol
> Rental occupied housing units: 26.5% (Tennessee: 33.5%)
> Median rental cost: $678 (Tennessee: $897)
> Median home value: $140,800 (Tennessee: $177,600)
> Median household income: $46,685 (Tennessee: $54,833)
> No. of metros considered in ranking: 10
Texas: Longview
> Rental occupied housing units: 31.5% (Texas: 37.7%)
> Median rental cost: $850 (Texas: $1,082)
> Median home value: $141,700 (Texas: $187,200)
> Median household income: $53,524 (Texas: $63,826)
> No. of metros considered in ranking: 25
Utah: Ogden-Clearfield
> Rental occupied housing units: 23.4% (Utah: 29.5%)
> Median rental cost: $1,038 (Utah: $1,090)
> Median home value: $284,500 (Utah: $305,400)
> Median household income: $78,680 (Utah: $74,197)
> No. of metros considered in ranking: 5
[in-text-ad-2]
Vermont: Burlington-South Burlington*
> Rental occupied housing units: 33.2% (Vermont: 28.7%)
> Median rental cost: $1,248 (Vermont: $999)
> Median home value: $285,200 (Vermont: $230,900)
> Median household income: $73,447 (Vermont: $63,477)
> No. of metros considered in ranking: 1
*Because Burlington-South Burlington is the only eligible metro in Vermont, it is the metro with the lowest rental rate by default.
Virginia: Winchester
> Rental occupied housing units: 28.6% (Virginia: 33.3%)
> Median rental cost: $1,071 (Virginia: $1,257)
> Median home value: $242,500 (Virginia: $282,800)
> Median household income: $69,417 (Virginia: $76,398)
> No. of metros considered in ranking: 9
[in-text-ad]
Washington: Mount Vernon-Anacortes
> Rental occupied housing units: 30.0% (Washington: 36.7%)
> Median rental cost: $1,145 (Washington: $1,337)
> Median home value: $341,600 (Washington: $366,800)
> Median household income: $71,021 (Washington: $77,006)
> No. of metros considered in ranking: 11
West Virginia: Beckley
> Rental occupied housing units: 24.3% (West Virginia: 26.3%)
> Median rental cost: $691 (West Virginia: $732)
> Median home value: $104,100 (West Virginia: $123,200)
> Median household income: $43,444 (West Virginia: $48,037)
> No. of metros considered in ranking: 7
Wisconsin: Appleton
> Rental occupied housing units: 26.6% (Wisconsin: 32.9%)
> Median rental cost: $815 (Wisconsin: $872)
> Median home value: $180,300 (Wisconsin: $189,200)
> Median household income: $70,261 (Wisconsin: $63,293)
> No. of metros considered in ranking: 12
[in-text-ad-2]
Wyoming: Cheyenne
> Rental occupied housing units: 27.4% (Wyoming: 29.0%)
> Median rental cost: $933 (Wyoming: $853)
> Median home value: $239,900 (Wyoming: $228,000)
> Median household income: $69,369 (Wyoming: $65,304)
> No. of metros considered in ranking: 2
Methodology
To determine the metro with the lowest rental rate in every state, 24/7 Wall St. reviewed five-year estimates of the share of housing units that are occupied by renters from the U.S. Census Bureau’s 2020 American Community Survey.
We used the 384 metropolitan statistical areas as delineated by the United States Office of Management and Budget and used by the Census Bureau as our definition of metros.
Metros were excluded if rental rates were not available in the 2020 ACS, if there were fewer than 1,000 housing units, or if the sampling error associated with a metro’s data was deemed too high.
The sampling error was defined as too high if the coefficient of variation — a statistical assessment of how reliable an estimate is — for a metro’s rental rate was above 15% and greater than two standard deviations above the mean CV for all metros’ rental rates. We similarly excluded metros that had a sampling error too high for their population, using the same definition.
Metros were ranked based on the percentage of housing units that are occupied by renters. To break ties, we used the number of housing units that are occupied by renters.
Additional information on median rental cost, median home value, and median household income are also five-year estimates from the 2020 ACS. Because the Census Bureau didn’t release one-year estimates for 2020 due to data collection issues caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, all ACS data are five-year estimates.
The Average American Is Losing Their Savings Every Day (Sponsor)
If you’re like many Americans and keep your money ‘safe’ in a checking or savings account, think again. The average yield on a savings account is a paltry .4% today, and inflation is much higher. Checking accounts are even worse.
Every day you don’t move to a high-yield savings account that beats inflation, you lose more and more value.
But there is good news. To win qualified customers, some accounts are paying 9-10x this national average. That’s an incredible way to keep your money safe, and get paid at the same time. Our top pick for high yield savings accounts includes other one time cash bonuses, and is FDIC insured.
Click here to see how much more you could be earning on your savings today. It takes just a few minutes and your money could be working for you.
Thank you for reading! Have some feedback for us?
Contact the 24/7 Wall St. editorial team.
Latest from 24/7
