Special Report
25 American Cities Where Police Are Funded Better Than Health and Social Services
Published:
Since the murder of George Floyd at the hands of police in summer 2020 and subsequent protests in the U.S. and around the world, a growing number of activists have called on governments to divest funding from police departments and reinvest funding into health care and social support programs. While calls to “defund the police” have dwindled since 2020 and police budgets have largely remained unchanged, the debates of the last few years have put city budgets under increased scrutiny from the public.
Most U.S. cities spend more on police, corrections, and related institutions than on programs related to resident welfare. Researchers have found that increases in policing and correctional expenditures tend to occur in tandem with decreases in welfare spending, often at the expense of programs dedicated to housing, education, and mental health.
To determine which cities prioritize police over health and support systems the most, 24/7 Wall St. reviewed data on municipal spending from Health in Justice Action Lab, an initiative of the Center for Health Policy and Law of Northeastern University. We first ranked the 50 largest U.S. cities by population based on the initiative’s 2020 Carceral Resource Index – a composite measure that compares municipal expenditures on health and social support with expenditures on carceral systems.
Carceral systems include police, courts, jails, and related services. Health and social support systems include health and human services, public health, parks and recreation, housing and employment assistance, and more. The Carceral Resource Index, or CRI, value ranges between -1 and 1, with higher numbers denoting budget prioritization of health and support systems over carceral systems. We chose the 25 cities with the lowest CRI values, meaning the ones that spend considerably more on law enforcement and punishment systems relative to health and social ones.
Across the United States, spending on carceral institutions is roughly twice the expenditure on welfare systems. In 2020, expenditures on health and support systems outweighed carceral expenditures in just seven of the 50 largest U.S. cities. In at least a dozen major cities, for every $1 spent on health and support, $5 or more are spent on carceral systems. In Kansas City, Missouri, where police the police budget is the most outsized relative to welfare, carceral expenditures outweigh health and support expenditures by a ratio of 20 to 1. (These are the largest police departments in the U.S.)
Many of the cities where police budgets are the largest relative to welfare spending have large disparities in other socioeconomic measures. In Chicago, for example, 64.3% of the Black population lives in majority-Black neighborhoods, making it one of the most segregated cities nationwide. Click here to see the most segregated cities in America.
Click here to see our detailed methodology.
25. Minneapolis, MN
> Carceral Resource Index (-1 to 1): -0.56 (lower values mean higher law enforcement and punishment budget priority)
> Carceral spending: $202.3 million
> Health and support spending: $56.9 million
> Total population: 425,091
[in-text-ad]
24. San Diego, CA
> Carceral Resource Index value (-1 to 1): -0.57 (lower values mean higher law enforcement and punishment budget priority)
> Carceral spending: $560.4 million
> Health and support spending: $152.6 million
> Total population: 1.4 million
23. Mesa, AZ
> Carceral Resource Index value (-1 to 1): -0.57 (lower values mean higher law enforcement and punishment budget priority)
> Carceral spending: $179.7 million
> Health and support spending: $48.7 million
> Total population: 497,752
22. Jacksonville, FL
> Carceral Resource Index value (-1 to 1): -0.57 (lower values mean higher law enforcement and punishment budget priority)
> Carceral spending: $493.7 million
> Health and support spending: $133.8 million
> Total population: 937,690
[in-text-ad-2]
21. Tulsa, OK
> Carceral Resource Index value (-1 to 1): -0.58 (lower values mean higher law enforcement and punishment budget priority)
> Carceral spending: $104.7 million
> Health and support spending: $28.1 million
> Total population: 410,652
20. San Antonio, TX
> Carceral Resource Index value (-1 to 1): -0.58 (lower values mean higher law enforcement and punishment budget priority)
> Carceral spending: $512.7 million
> Health and support spending: $137.1 million
> Total population: 1.4 million
[in-text-ad]
19. Arlington, TX
> Carceral Resource Index value (-1 to 1): -0.60 (lower values mean higher law enforcement and punishment budget priority)
> Carceral spending: $121.4 million
> Health and support spending: $30.5 million
> Total population: 392,304
18. Phoenix, AZ
> Carceral Resource Index value (-1 to 1): -0.60 (lower values mean higher law enforcement and punishment budget priority)
> Carceral spending: $603.1 million
> Health and support spending: $148.7 million
> Total population: 1.6 million
17. Bakersfield, CA
> Carceral Resource Index value (-1 to 1): -0.60 (lower values mean higher law enforcement and punishment budget priority)
> Carceral spending: $96.9 million
> Health and support spending: $23.9 million
> Total population: 398,756
[in-text-ad-2]
16. Las Vegas, NV
> Carceral Resource Index value (-1 to 1): -0.61 (lower values mean higher law enforcement and punishment budget priority)
> Carceral spending: $269.6 million
> Health and support spending: $64.3 million
> Total population: 634,786
15. Sacramento, CA
> Carceral Resource Index value (-1 to 1): -0.62 (lower values mean higher law enforcement and punishment budget priority)
> Carceral spending: $149.8 million
> Health and support spending: $35.5 million
> Total population: 518,605
[in-text-ad]
14. Oakland, CA
> Carceral Resource Index value (-1 to 1): -0.63 (lower values mean higher law enforcement and punishment budget priority)
> Carceral spending: $295.2 million
> Health and support spending: $66.3 million
> Total population: 437,548
13. Colorado Springs, CO
> Carceral Resource Index value (-1 to 1): -0.65 (lower values mean higher law enforcement and punishment budget priority)
> Carceral spending: $117.4 million
> Health and support spending: $25.0 million
> Total population: 475,282
12. Atlanta, GA
> Carceral Resource Index value (-1 to 1): -0.65 (lower values mean higher law enforcement and punishment budget priority)
> Carceral spending: $250.5 million
> Health and support spending: $52.9 million
> Total population: 492,204
[in-text-ad-2]
11. Oklahoma City, OK
> Carceral Resource Index value (-1 to 1): -0.67 (lower values mean higher law enforcement and punishment budget priority)
> Carceral spending: $163.6 million
> Health and support spending: $32.6 million
> Total population: 673,183
10. Tucson, AZ
> Carceral Resource Index value (-1 to 1): -0.68 (lower values mean higher law enforcement and punishment budget priority)
> Carceral spending: $184.1 million
> Health and support spending: $35.0 million
> Total population: 538,167
[in-text-ad]
9. Memphis, TN
> Carceral Resource Index value (-1 to 1): -0.69 (lower values mean higher law enforcement and punishment budget priority)
> Carceral spending: $279.6 million
> Health and support spending: $50.6 million
> Total population: 634,139
8. Indianapolis, IN
> Carceral Resource Index value (-1 to 1): -0.72 (lower values mean higher law enforcement and punishment budget priority)
> Carceral spending: $241.2 million
> Health and support spending: $40.1 million
> Total population: 880,104
7. Houston, TX
> Carceral Resource Index value (-1 to 1): -0.73 (lower values mean higher law enforcement and punishment budget priority)
> Carceral spending: $932.9 million
> Health and support spending: $148.6 million
> Total population: 2.3 million
[in-text-ad-2]
6. Long Beach, CA
> Carceral Resource Index value (-1 to 1): -0.73 (lower values mean higher law enforcement and punishment budget priority)
> Carceral spending: $250.2 million
> Health and support spending: $39.1 million
> Total population: 466,565
5. Charlotte, NC
> Carceral Resource Index value (-1 to 1): -0.74 (lower values mean higher law enforcement and punishment budget priority)
> Carceral spending: $285.2 million
> Health and support spending: $43.4 million
> Total population: 864,871
[in-text-ad]
4. Fresno, CA
> Carceral Resource Index value (-1 to 1): -0.80 (lower values mean higher law enforcement and punishment budget priority)
> Carceral spending: $184.8 million
> Health and support spending: $20.0 million
> Total population: 538,678
24/7 Wall St.
3. Chicago, IL
> Carceral Resource Index value (-1 to 1): -0.82 (lower values mean higher law enforcement and punishment budget priority)
> Carceral spending: $6.7 billion
> Health and support spending: $670.7 million
> Total population: 2.7 million
2. Columbus, OH
> Carceral Resource Index value (-1 to 1): -0.87 (lower values mean higher law enforcement and punishment budget priority)
> Carceral spending: $385.5 million
> Health and support spending: $26.8 million
> Total population: 898,143
[in-text-ad-2]
1. Kansas City, MO
> Carceral Resource Index value (-1 to 1): -0.91 (lower values mean higher law enforcement and punishment budget priority)
> Carceral spending: $246.7 million
> Health and support spending: $12.2 million
> Total population: 502,597
Methodology
To determine the cities prioritizing police more than health and support services, 24/7 Wall St. reviewed data on municipal spending from the Health in Justice Action Lab of Northeastern University. The 50 largest U.S. cities by population were ranked based on the Health in Justice Action Lab’s 2020 Carceral Resource Index – a composite measure of the contrast between municipal expenditures on health and social support versus carceral systems. CRI values are normalized on a scale of -1 to 1, where a higher number indicates greater prioritization of health and support systems over carceral expenditures in the 2020 fiscal year, and vice versa. We then chose the 25 cities with the lowest CRI values.
Data on city spending by category in 2020 also came from the Health in Justice Action Lab. Carceral spending includes expenditure on police, sheriffs, courts, prosecutors, public defenders, jails and community supervision programs. Health and support spending includes health and human services, public health, parks and recreation, housing assistance, employment assistance, civic and community engagement, and arts and culture. Supplemental data on total population came from the U.S. Census Bureau’s 2021 American Community Survey and are five-year estimates.
The #1 Thing to Do Before You Claim Social Security (Sponsor)
Choosing the right (or wrong) time to claim Social Security can dramatically change your retirement. So, before making one of the biggest decisions of your financial life, it’s a smart idea to get an extra set of eyes on your complete financial situation.
A financial advisor can help you decide the right Social Security option for you and your family. Finding a qualified financial advisor doesn’t have to be hard. SmartAsset’s free tool matches you with up to three financial advisors who serve your area, and you can interview your advisor matches at no cost to decide which one is right for you.
Click here to match with up to 3 financial pros who would be excited to help you optimize your Social Security outcomes.
Have questions about retirement or personal finance? Email us at [email protected]!
By emailing your questions to 24/7 Wall St., you agree to have them published anonymously on a673b.bigscoots-temp.com.
By submitting your story, you understand and agree that we may use your story, or versions of it, in all media and platforms, including via third parties.
Thank you for reading! Have some feedback for us?
Contact the 24/7 Wall St. editorial team.
Latest from 24/7
