The North Atlantic Treaty Organization was formed in 1949 by 12 countries, including Canada, France, the United Kingdom, and the United States, to deter Soviet aggression in Europe. According to NATO, the alliance was also created to forbid the revival of nationalist militarism in Europe through a strong North American presence on the continent, and encouraging European political integration. But in the three decades since the Soviet Union fell, many world leaders, have questioned NATO’s continued relevance. The alliance’s critics got answers on Feb. 24, 2022, when Russia launched a full-scale military invasion of Ukraine.
What once started as a collective of 10 countries, has now expanded to include 31, with Sweden expecting to join shortly, after almost two years of delays. Nine countries in NATO share a border with either Russia, Ukraine, or both. Under Article 5 of the founding treaty, an attack against one NATO ally is an attack against all, and while Ukraine is not a NATO member, if the ongoing war spreads across a NATO border, it could trigger a collective military response and expand the conflict to a global scale. (Here is a look at 13 major wars happening right now.)
Russia may be one of the world’s leading military powers, but the threat posed by the combined forces of the defensive alliance makes a deliberate Russian attack on a NATO country unlikely. Despite its size, Russia’s military assets are outnumbered by NATO’s in the majority of categories on this list. However, one notable exception is nuclear warheads, as Russia has the largest nuclear stockpile of any country in the world. (Here is a look at every country’s nuclear weapons arsenal, ranked.)
24/7 Wall St. reviewed how NATO’s military strength compares to Russia’s by using data from Global Firepower’s 2023 report on international military capabilities. We also reviewed 2022 military spending from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute and estimated 2023 nuclear warhead inventory from the Arms Control Association.
In the event of a conflict between Russia and NATO, individual NATO members would not likely be able to commit all military assets to the war effort. Global Firepower therefore assumed a minimum 25% contribution from each NATO ally to each category listed in this story — from active-duty troops and reserve forces to weapons and material. Global Firepower assumed only 75% of Russian military assets to be available and operational. Still, for each category, we also listed the estimated full military assets of Russian and NATO forces.
Here is a comparison of military strength between Russia and NATO
Combined military personnel
- NATO’s projected force: 1,486,175 (Est. total available: 6,755,100)
- Russia’s projected force: 998,175 (Est. total available: 1,330,900)
Personnel: Active-duty (front line)
- NATO’s projected force: 845,250 (Est. total available: 3,382,000)
- Russia’s projected force: 623,175 (Est. total available: 830,900)
Personnel: Reserve
- NATO’s projected force: 640,925 (Est. total available: 2,620,700)
- Russia’s projected force: 187,500 (Est. total available: 250,000)
Personnel: Paramilitary
- NATO’s projected force: 188,100 (Est. total available: 752,400)
- Russia’s projected force: 187,500 (Est. total available: 250,000)
Total airpower
- NATO’s projected force: 5,200 units (Est. total available: 20,799 units)
- Russia’s projected force: 3,137 units (Est. total available: 4,182 units)
Airpower: Fighters / Interceptors
- NATO’s projected force: 863 units (Est. total available: 3,453 units)
- Russia’s projected force: 580 units (Est. total available: 773 units)
Airpower: Dedicated attack aircraft
- NATO’s projected force: 277 units (Est. total available: 1,108 units)
- Russia’s projected force: 558 units (Est. total available: 744 units)
Airpower: Transports (Fixed-wing)
- NATO’s projected force: 379 units (Est. total available: 1,517 units)
- Russia’s projected force: 333 units (Est. total available: 444 units)
Airpower: Special-mission aircraft
- NATO’s projected force: 243 units (Est. total available: 971 units)
- Russia’s projected force: 110 units (Est. total available: 147 units)
Airpower: Aerial refueling
- NATO’s projected force: 154 units (Est. total available: 615 units)
- Russia’s projected force: 14 units (Est. total available: 19 units)
Airpower: Helicopters
- NATO’s projected force: 2,159 units (Est. total available: 8,634 units)
- Russia’s projected force: 1,148 units (Est. total available: 1,531 units)
Airpower: Attack helicopters
- NATO’s projected force: 360 units (Est. total available: 1,439 units)
- Russia’s projected force: 403 units (Est. total available: 537 units)
Ground vehicles: Tanks
- NATO’s projected force: 3,154 vehicles (Est. total available: 12,647 vehicles)
- Russia’s projected force: 9,425 vehicles (Est. total available: 12,566 vehicles)
Ground vehicles: Armored fighting vehicles
- NATO’s projected force: 249,919 units (Est. total available: 1,010,212 units)
- Russia’s projected force: 113,731 units (Est. total available: 151,641 units)
Ground vehicles: Self-propelled guns
- NATO’s projected force: 1,151 vehicles (Est. total available: 4,647 vehicles)
- Russia’s projected force: 4,931 vehicles (Est. total available: 6,575 vehicles)
Ground vehicles: Towed artillery
- NATO’s projected force: 1,765 pieces (Est. total available: 7,216 pieces)
- Russia’s projected force: 3,252 pieces (Est. total available: 4,336 pieces)
Ground vehicles: Rocket artillery
- NATO’s projected force: 429 pieces (Est. total available: 3,347 pieces)
- Russia’s projected force: 2,915 pieces (Est. total available: 3,887 pieces)
Total naval assets
- NATO’s projected force: 599 hulls (Est. total available: 2,397 hulls)
- Russia’s projected force: 449 hulls (Est. total available: 598 hulls)
Naval forces: Aircraft carriers
- NATO’s projected force: 4 hulls (Est. total available: 16 hulls)
- Russia’s projected force: 1 hulls (Est. total available: 1 hulls)
Naval forces: Helicopter carriers
- NATO’s projected force: 3 hulls (Est. total available: 13 hulls)
- Russia’s projected force: 0 hulls (Est. total available: 0 hulls)
Naval forces: Destroyers
- NATO’s projected force: 28 hulls (Est. total available: 112 hulls)
- Russia’s projected force: 11 hulls (Est. total available: 15 hulls)
Naval forces: Frigates
- NATO’s projected force: 34 hulls (Est. total available: 135 hulls)
- Russia’s projected force: 8 hulls (Est. total available: 11 hulls)
Naval forces: Corvettes
- NATO’s projected force: 14 hulls (Est. total available: 55 hulls)
- Russia’s projected force: 65 hulls (Est. total available: 86 hulls)
Naval forces: Submarines
- NATO’s projected force: 36 hulls (Est. total available: 143 hulls)
- Russia’s projected force: 53 hulls (Est. total available: 70 hulls)
Naval forces: Mine warfare vessels
- NATO’s projected force: 43 hulls (Est. total available: 167 hulls)
- Russia’s projected force: 37 hulls (Est. total available: 49 hulls)
Nuclear weapons
- NATO’s projected force: 5,759 warheads
- Russia’s projected force: 5,889 warheads
Combined military budget
- NATO’s projected spending: $309.3 billion USD (Est. total available: $1.2 trillion USD)
- Russia’s projected spending: $86.4 billion USD (Est. total available: $86.4 billion USD)
Oil production
- NATO’s projected capacity: 6.8 million barrels-per-day (Est. total available: 27 million barrels-per-day)
- Russia’s projected capacity: 10.8 million barrels-per-day
Is Your Money Earning the Best Possible Rate? (Sponsor)
Let’s face it: If your money is just sitting in a checking account, you’re losing value every single day. With most checking accounts offering little to no interest, the cash you worked so hard to save is gradually being eroded by inflation.
However, by moving that money into a high-yield savings account, you can put your cash to work, growing steadily with little to no effort on your part. In just a few clicks, you can set up a high-yield savings account and start earning interest immediately.
There are plenty of reputable banks and online platforms that offer competitive rates, and many of them come with zero fees and no minimum balance requirements. Click here to see if you’re earning the best possible rate on your money!
Thank you for reading! Have some feedback for us?
Contact the 24/7 Wall St. editorial team.
Latest from 24/7
