Sponsored Content

This Is America’s Most Dangerous City for Driving

Grafissimo / Getty Images

During the COVID-19 pandemic, American motorists have decreased their amount of driving precipitously as they worked remotely instead of commuting and stayed at home instead of going out to restaurants, shows, and sporting events. Counterintuitively, however, that has not resulted in safer roads.

To find the most dangerous city for driving, RV rental company Outdoorsy researchers created a composite index, combining relative likelihood of a collision, total motor vehicle fatalities, and share of fatal collisions involving a drunk driver. According to the results, Dallas ranks as the city with the most dangerous roads, beating out Baton Rouge, Louisiana, and San Bernardino, California, in second and third places, respectively. 

“Unfortunately, the pandemic and the resulting economic dislocations and stay-at-home orders have been accompanied by a sharp increase in risky driving and fatal crashes,” wrote the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) in January, in ”An Open Letter to the Driving Public.”

Before 2020, driving was already risky enough. In 2019, road accidents killed more than 36,000 people in the U.S. and injured more than 2.7 million, according to NHTSA.

Preliminary data for 2020, the agency said, suggests a sharp increase in risky behavior behind the wheel and more fatal crashes. People were driving faster in select metropolitan areas, were driving while impaired by drugs or alcohol, and were not wearing seat belts. (In April of last year, double the usual number of people were thrown from their vehicles during crashes.)

Some U.S. cities are more perilous than others. In addition to differences in driver behavior, this may be due to the fact that speed limits and other traffic safety laws vary from state to state, and the fact that road maintenance is better in some places than others.

This ranking of America’s most dangerous cities for drivers as of 2019 is based on information collated from both governmental and private sources by the RV rental company Outdoorsy.

Researchers analyzed data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s Fatality Analysis Reporting System, Allstate America’s Best Drivers Report 2019, and the U.S. Census Bureau. Only major American cities with data available from all three data sources were included, and in the event of a tie, the city with the longest period between collisions ranked better.

Click here to see the most dangerous cities for driving.

DenisTangneyJr / iStock via Getty Images

25. Riverside, California
> Avg. time between collisions: 8.3 years
> Likelihood of collision compared to US avg.: +28.2% — #63 out of 194 cities
> Motor vehicle fatalities per 100k: 9.2 — #69 out of 194 cities
> Population: 331,369

[in-text-ad]

Stewart Sutton / Photodisc via Getty Images

24. Lancaster, California
> Avg. time between collisions: 9.1 years
> Likelihood of collision compared to US avg.: +16.3% — #98 out of 194 cities
> Motor vehicle fatalities per 100k: 13.8 — #24 out of 194 cities
> Population: 157,604

Sean Pavone / Getty Images

23. Savannah, Georgia
> Avg. time between collisions: 7.7 years
> Likelihood of collision compared to US avg.: +37.8% — #42 out of 194 cities
> Motor vehicle fatalities per 100k: 12.1 — #35 out of 194 cities
> Population: 144,457

Nclauzing / Getty Images

22. Memphis, Tennessee
> Avg. time between collisions: 9.1 years
> Likelihood of collision compared to US avg.: +16.9% — #96 out of 194 cities
> Motor vehicle fatalities per 100k: 17.6 — #10 out of 194 cities
> Population: 651,088

[in-text-ad-2]

SeanPavonePhoto / Getty Images

21. Jackson, Mississippi
> Avg. time between collisions: 9.7 years
> Likelihood of collision compared to US avg.: +8.8% — #125 out of 194 cities
> Motor vehicle fatalities per 100k: 18.9 — #7 out of 194 cities
> Population: 160,532

Davel5957 / iStock via Getty Images

20. Irving, Texas
> Avg. time between collisions: 7.0 years
> Likelihood of collision compared to US avg.: +50.8% — #20 out of 194 cities
> Motor vehicle fatalities per 100k: 6.4 — #124 out of 194 cities
> Population: 239,779

[in-text-ad]

SeanPavonePhoto / iStock via Getty Images

19. Charleston, South Carolina
> Avg. time between collisions: 9.4 years
> Likelihood of collision compared to US avg.: +12.7% — #115 out of 194 cities
> Motor vehicle fatalities per 100k: 21.7 — #2 out of 194 cities
> Population: 143,151

DenisTangneyJr / iStock Unreleased via Getty Images

18. Modesto, California
> Avg. time between collisions: 7.9 years
> Likelihood of collision compared to US avg.: +34.3% — #46 out of 194 cities
> Motor vehicle fatalities per 100k: 9.2 — #69 out of 194 cities
> Population: 215,196

Michael Barera / Wikimedia Commons

17. Mesquite, Texas
> Avg. time between collisions: 7.6 years
> Likelihood of collision compared to US avg.: +38.4% — #40 out of 194 cities
> Motor vehicle fatalities per 100k: 8.7 — #76 out of 194 cities
> Population: 140,795

[in-text-ad-2]

https://www.flickr.com/photos/affiliate/ / Wikimedia Commons

16. Arlington, Texas
> Avg. time between collisions: 7.6 years
> Likelihood of collision compared to US avg.: +40.0% — #36 out of 194 cities
> Motor vehicle fatalities per 100k: 6.9 — #110 out of 194 cities
> Population: 398,860

SpVVK / Getty Images

15. Sacramento, California
> Avg. time between collisions: 7.6 years
> Likelihood of collision compared to US avg.: +40.0% — #36 out of 194 cities
> Motor vehicle fatalities per 100k: 11.2 — #48 out of 194 cities
> Population: 513,620

[in-text-ad]

f11photo / iStock via Getty Images

14. St. Louis, Missouri
> Avg. time between collisions: 8.6 years
> Likelihood of collision compared to US avg.: +22.4% — #81 out of 194 cities
> Motor vehicle fatalities per 100k: 18.3 — #8 out of 194 cities
> Population: 300,576

Public Domain / Wikimedia Commons

13. Charlotte, North Carolina
> Avg. time between collisions: 7.8 years
> Likelihood of collision compared to US avg.: +36.0% — #45 out of 194 cities
> Motor vehicle fatalities per 100k: 10.4 — #58 out of 194 cities
> Population: 885,707

NicolasMcComber / Getty Images

12. Austin, Texas
> Avg. time between collisions: 7.6 years
> Likelihood of collision compared to US avg.: +39.2% — #38 out of 194 cities
> Motor vehicle fatalities per 100k: 8.4 — #79 out of 194 cities
> Population: 979,263

[in-text-ad-2]

11. San Antonio, Texas
> Avg. time between collisions: 8.2 years
> Likelihood of collision compared to US avg.: +29.0% — #59 out of 194 cities
> Motor vehicle fatalities per 100k: 9.7 — #67 out of 194 cities
> Population: 1,547,250

PapaBear / Getty Images

10. Cleveland, Ohio
> Avg. time between collisions: 8.9 years
> Likelihood of collision compared to US avg.: +19.0% — #89 out of 194 cities
> Motor vehicle fatalities per 100k: 12.3 — #33 out of 194 cities
> Population: 380,989

[in-text-ad]

lavin photography / iStock via Getty Images

9. Cincinnati, Ohio
> Avg. time between collisions: 7.2 years
> Likelihood of collision compared to US avg.: +47.6% — #27 out of 194 cities
> Motor vehicle fatalities per 100k: 8.7 — #76 out of 194 cities
> Population: 303,954

Sean Pavone / Getty Images

8. Houston, Texas
> Avg. time between collisions: 7.7 years
> Likelihood of collision compared to US avg.: +38.1% — #41 out of 194 cities
> Motor vehicle fatalities per 100k: 10.1 — #63 out of 194 cities
> Population: 2,316,797

pawel.gaul / E+ via Getty Images

7. Detroit, Michigan
> Avg. time between collisions: 8.6 years
> Likelihood of collision compared to US avg.: +22.9% — #79 out of 194 cities
> Motor vehicle fatalities per 100k: 16.1 — #16 out of 194 cities
> Population: 670,052

[in-text-ad-2]

Barbara Smyers / iStock via Getty Images

6. Fort Worth, Texas
> Avg. time between collisions: 8.2 years
> Likelihood of collision compared to US avg.: +29.7% — #58 out of 194 cities
> Motor vehicle fatalities per 100k: 11.5 — #45 out of 194 cities
> Population: 913,656

Barry Williams / Getty Images

5. Atlanta, Georgia
> Avg. time between collisions: 7.1 years
> Likelihood of collision compared to US avg.: +49.5% — #21 out of 194 cities
> Motor vehicle fatalities per 100k: 13.5 — #26 out of 194 cities
> Population: 506,804

[in-text-ad]

f11photo / Getty Images

4. New Orleans, Louisiana
> Avg. time between collisions: 7.1 years
> Likelihood of collision compared to US avg.: +49.1% — #23 out of 194 cities
> Motor vehicle fatalities per 100k: 11.1 — #49 out of 194 cities
> Population: 390,144

Doc Searls / Wikimedia Commons

3. San Bernardino, California
> Avg. time between collisions: 7.5 years
> Likelihood of collision compared to US avg.: +41.8% — #33 out of 194 cities
> Motor vehicle fatalities per 100k: 17.9 — #9 out of 194 cities
> Population: 215,780

graphiknation / Getty Images

2. Baton Rouge, Louisiana
> Avg. time between collisions: 6.8 years
> Likelihood of collision compared to US avg.: +55.1% — #13 out of 194 cities
> Motor vehicle fatalities per 100k: 21.9 — #1 out of 194 cities
> Population: 220,248

[in-text-ad-2]

f11photo / iStock via Getty Images

1. Dallas, Texas
> Avg. time between collisions: 7.2 years
> Likelihood of collision compared to US avg.: +46.5% — #28 out of 194 cities
> Motor vehicle fatalities per 100k: 14.3 — #21 out of 194 cities
> Population: 1,343,565

Get Ready To Retire (Sponsored)

Start by taking a quick retirement quiz from SmartAsset that will match you with up to 3 financial advisors that serve your area and beyond in 5 minutes, or less.

Each advisor has been vetted by SmartAsset and is held to a fiduciary standard to act in your best interests.

Here’s how it works:
1. Answer SmartAsset advisor match quiz
2. Review your pre-screened matches at your leisure. Check out the advisors’ profiles.
3. Speak with advisors at no cost to you. Have an introductory call on the phone or introduction in person and choose whom to work with in the future

Get started right here.

Thank you for reading! Have some feedback for us?
Contact the 24/7 Wall St. editorial team.