Will Radio, TV, and Print Save Google’s Growth Rate? No.

Photo of Douglas A. McIntyre
By Douglas A. McIntyre Updated Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

From Internet Outsider

To hear people talk about Google’s moves into offline media, you would think the company is on the verge of capturing all the profit in the media industry.  It isn’t.  And this is not just because Google’s success in its offline efforts is far from guaranteed.

The important point here that people miss is that Google’s radio, TV, and print initiatives are the offline equivalent of its AdSense product, not its AdWords profit machine.  Why is this important?  Because , for every dollar of advertising spent on AdSense, Google captures only a tiny fraction of the profit that it captures for every dollar spent on AdWords.  When an advertiser buys a $1 per-click AdWord key word, Google generates $1 of revenue and about 60-70 cents of operating profit (very rough numbers).  When an advertiser buys a $1 per click AdSense keyword, meanwhile, Google generates $1 of GROSS revenue but only about 40 cents of net revenue–and only about 10-20 cents of operating profit.

Google’s revenue and profit share of offline advertising placements, moreover, is probably even less per dollar of gross revenue than it is for AdSense.  Why?  First, because Google has nowhere near the leverage in offline media that it does online.  Second, Google’s targeting and optimization systems are nowhere near as sophisticated offline as they are online (and won’t be for the foreseeable future).  Third, because the results of at least one public company in a similar ad sales and placement business suggest that the margins in the automated radio and TV placement business are downright horrible, at least with limited scale.

A small company called SWMX, which just reported its Q4 results, is making good headway in generating radio and TV placement revenue through electronic marketplaces (Q4 revenue grew 58% year over year).  The company is very small–only $16 million in placements and $2.5 million in revenue in 2006–but the early margin picture is not encouraging for those banking on Google’s offline initiatives to save its long-term growth rate. 

SWMX generated about a 50% gross margin (on its net revenue) in 2006.  The gross margin on its hypothetical GROSS revenue, meanwhile (the revenue stream that would be equivalent to Google’s gross revenue for AdSense), was only about 10%.  Again, this 10% gross margin per dollar of advertising spending compares to the 90% gross margin per dollar of advertising spending that Google generates on AdWords and the 40ish% gross margin on AdSense.  SWMX’s operating margin, meanwhile, is even less encouraging: The company lost $9 million last year on $2.5 million of revenue.

Would Google’s offline margins be better than SWMX’s?  Yes, probably.  Would they come close to matching the already (relatively) low margins that the company generates from AdSense?  Probably not.

So how much TV, Radio, and Print spending would Google have to capture to, say, double its current operating profits from 2006 levels?  (Assuming no further growth of the online businesses, which obviously should continue to grow quite nicely).  Google generated about $3.5 billion of operating profit last year.  To generate this much from an offline TV, radio, and print placement business, assuming a generous 10% operating margin (very generous, I think), Google would have to place $35 billion of gross advertising spending.  This compares to about $4 billion it generated from its wildly successful online ad rep/placement business, AdSense, in 2006. 

The conclusion?  It seems safe to say that, even if everything goes perfectly, it will be a while before Google’s offline initiatives contribute significantly to the company’s bottom line. 

Photo of Douglas A. McIntyre
About the Author Douglas A. McIntyre →

Douglas A. McIntyre is the co-founder, chief executive officer and editor in chief of 24/7 Wall St. and 24/7 Tempo. He has held these jobs since 2006.

McIntyre has written thousands of articles for 24/7 Wall St. He is an expert on corporate finance, the automotive industry, media companies and international finance. He has edited articles on national demographics, sports, personal income and travel.

His work has been quoted or mentioned in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, Los Angeles Times, The Washington Post, NBC News, Time, The New Yorker, HuffPost USA Today, Business Insider, Yahoo, AOL, MarketWatch, The Atlantic, Bloomberg, New York Post, Chicago Tribune, Forbes, The Guardian and many other major publications. McIntyre has been a guest on CNBC, the BBC and television and radio stations across the country.

A magna cum laude graduate of Harvard College, McIntyre also was president of The Harvard Advocate. Founded in 1866, the Advocate is the oldest college publication in the United States.

TheStreet.com, Comps.com and Edgar Online are some of the public companies for which McIntyre served on the board of directors. He was a Vicinity Corporation board member when the company was sold to Microsoft in 2002. He served on the audit committees of some of these companies.

McIntyre has been the CEO of FutureSource, a provider of trading terminals and news to commodities and futures traders. He was president of Switchboard, the online phone directory company. He served as chairman and CEO of On2 Technologies, the video compression company that provided video compression software for Adobe’s Flash. Google bought On2 in 2009.

Our $500K AI Portfolio

See us invest in our favorite AI stock ideas for free

Our Investment Portfolio

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618