
Apple and Amazon bet that streaming music is a way to get and hold customers for its other, larger businesses. In Apple’s case, this is hardware mostly, the iPhone and iPad. If people keep streaming music accounts with Apple, it will drive loyalty to all the company’s major sources of revenue, much as iTunes has in the past. Amazon believes something similar. Its Prime service tethers customers to its core e-commerce business. Streaming is tied to free shipping, which does not seem to make sense on the surface. Prime has been available for years, but Amazon will not tell whether it is a financial success, as is par for the course for the company.
Google does have a steaming music service, buried among its scores of products and services, somewhere between Google Maps and Google+. Google Play Music works with iTunes, a concession that Apple leads the industry. It also provides a way to view music videos on YouTube. The service costs $9.99 a month, well within the range of competition pricing. But Google Play Music has been abandoned nearly as much as Google+ has.
Google Play Music is a perfect example of how a company that enters a market and then finds that its place in the market creates few or no advantages for it. Google could press the use of its streaming music service. It has a large enough customer count. If it bothered to, it might catch Spotify, which is not much ahead of the Google product in market share.
Google can easily surrender in the streaming music industry. Apple needs to be in it, management reasons, to be “sticky” to customers. Pandora has to be in it because it has no other business.
Sometimes traditional core businesses work well enough that bolting on new ones makes no sense at all. Google will not stream.
ALSO READ: 4 Tech Stocks That Could Rocket Higher on a Short Squeeze