Technology

SAP Settles With SEC Over FCPA Violations

Chris Lange

Published: February 3, 2016 12:10 pm

Last Updated: January 13, 2020 1:41 pm

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently announced that software manufacturer SAP S.E. (NYSE: SAP) has agreed to give up $3.7 million in sales profits to settle charges that it violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) when procuring business in Panama.

The SEC’s order finds that SAP violated the internal controls provisions and the books and records provisions of the FCPA. Without admitting or denying the findings, SAP consented to the entry of the cease-and-desist order and agreed to pay disgorgement of $3.7 million in profits from SAP’s software sales to the Panamanian government plus prejudgment interest of $188,896.

According to an SEC investigation, SAP’s deficient internal controls allowed a former SAP executive to pay $145,000 in bribes to a senior Panamanian government official and offer bribes to two others in exchange for lucrative sales contracts.

Specifically, the SEC charged SAP executive Vicente E. Garcia in a separate enforcement action last year that included a parallel criminal action. Garcia has been sentenced to 22 months in prison.

Kara Brockmeyer, chief of the SEC Enforcement Division’s FCPA Unit, commented:

SAP’s internal controls failed to flag Garcia’s misconduct as he easily falsified internal approval forms and disguised his bribes as discounts.

A few of the highlights from the SEC order were:

• SAP is headquartered in Germany and executes most of its sales through a network of worldwide corporate partners, including a partner in Panama.
• The bribery scheme involved providing large discounts of up to 82 percent to SAP’s Panamanian partner, who used the excessive discounts to create a slush fund out of which to pay bribes to Panamanian officials on Garcia’s behalf so SAP could sell software.
• SAP had no requirements for heightened anti-corruption scrutiny for such large discounts.
• SAP falsely recorded the slush fund as legitimate discounts on the books of SAP’s Mexican subsidiary, and the figures were subsequently consolidated into SAP’s financial statements.
• SAP failed to devise and maintain a sufficient system of internal accounting controls to provide reasonable assurances that the discounts were recorded in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.