The Information had much of Bloomberg’s Apple story 19 mos. ago

Photo of Steven M. Peters
By Steven M. Peters Updated Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

But without the Chinese, their spy chip or the denials of intelligence agencies on both sides of the pond.

 

From Amir Efrati’s Apple Severed Ties with Server Supplier After Security Concern ($), posted Feb. 23, 2017:

In early 2016, Apple discovered what it believed was a potential security vulnerability in at least one data center server it purchased from a U.S.-based manufacturer, Super Micro Computer, according to a Super Micro executive and two people who were briefed about the incident at Apple. The server was part of Apple’s technical infrastructure, which powers its web-based services and holds customer data.

Apple ended up terminating its years long business relationship with Super Micro, according to Tau Leng, a senior vice president of technology for Super Micro, and a person who was told about the incident by a senior infrastructure engineering executive at Apple. The tech giant even returned some of Super Micro’s servers to the company, according to one of the people briefed about the incident.

There is conflicting information about the exact nature of the vulnerability and the circumstances surrounding the incident. According to Mr. Leng, an Apple representative told its account manager at Super Micro via email that Apple’s “internal development environment was being compromised” because of firmware it downloaded to certain microchips within servers it had bought from Super Micro.

Apple, insisting that Efrati got key details wrong, referred me to a statement quoted by The Information at the time:

An Apple spokesman told The Information in a statement that Apple was “not aware of… infected firmware found on the servers purchased from this vendor.”

The Apple spokesman declined to describe the nature of the problem Apple discovered. There’s no evidence the episode resulted in theft of data from Apple, and the Apple spokesman specifically said that the company was “not aware of any data being transmitted to an unauthorized party.”

My take: Without the promise of a Chinese spy chip, Efrati’s story didn’t get much traction.

See also: No Chinese spy chip, says deep state

[apple-subscribe]

Photo of Steven M. Peters
About the Author Steven M. Peters →

Our $500K AI Portfolio

See us invest in our favorite AI stock ideas for free

Our Investment Portfolio

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618