AT&T Sponsored Data Plan: Aiming to Kill Net Neutrality

Photo of Paul Ausick
By Paul Ausick Updated Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

164263560
Thinkstock
Monday’s announcement by AT&T Inc. (NYSE: T) that it would allow rich companies that push a lot of bits through AT&T’s pipes to subsidize costs to end users is an end-run around the long-standing debate about net neutrality. Under the company’s plan, potential sponsors like Netflix Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) and Google Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG) that send out bandwidth-intensive videos would be allowed to pay the cost of those transmissions so that the transmitted data would not count against an end-user’s subscription plan.

Whether or not Netflix or Google will take advantage of the opportunity is another whole question. But given the rise in popularity of mobile video, carriers like AT&T and Verizon Wireless have to try something to keep their revenues up and their subscribers from defecting as usage and data costs rise.

The carriers have long-argued that they should be allowed to charge more for bandwidth-intensive transmissions like video, and they have been kept from doing so by Federal Communications Commission (FCC) rules that prohibit Internet Service Providers (ISPs) from favoring one kind of service over another. The FCC has, in effect, stood behind the concept of net neutrality, where transmission of data does not depend on either its source or destination. Data is neutral, and every bit is no more or less equal than any other.

The rules, however, apply only to fixed-line ISPs, not wireless carriers. The effect of a sponsored data plan will be to favor those companies that can and are willing to pay to the disadvantage of those who cannot or will not pay.

Expect the cable and satellite providers to raise a stink about AT&T’s plan. Consumer advocacy groups, too, have already joined the fray. As one consumer advocate told Wired, “Letting the carriers charge more or less money to reach certain sites is discriminatory, and it’s not how the Internet is supposed to work.” Maybe not, but if AT&T gets its way, that is how the Internet will work in the future.

Photo of Paul Ausick
About the Author Paul Ausick →

Paul Ausick has been writing for a673b.bigscoots-temp.com for more than a decade. He has written extensively on investing in the energy, defense, and technology sectors. In a previous life, he wrote technical documentation and managed a marketing communications group in Silicon Valley.

He has a bachelor's degree in English from the University of Chicago and now lives in Montana, where he fishes for trout in the summer and stays inside during the winter.

Featured Reads

Our top personal finance-related articles today. Your wallet will thank you later.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618