What’s Hitting the Fan at Standard Chartered

Photo of Paul Ausick
By Paul Ausick Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

British-based Standard Chartered PLC, which agreed yesterday to a settlement with the state of New York that cost the bank $340 million, is seeking a speedy, collective resolution to outstanding investigations being conducted by four other agencies: the U.S. Treasury Department, the U.S. Justice Department, the Federal Reserve and the Manhattan District Attorney’s office. A spokesman for the bank’s law firm is cited by Reuters:

Negotiations are going on between the other agencies, and we are talking to them. It is safe to assume there will now be a collective agreement.

Well, maybe not so safe. A Federal Reserve spokeswoman is cited in the Wall Street Journal saying that the Fed “continues to work with other agencies on a comprehensive resolution.” The Treasury and Justice departments are cited in the Journal as saying only that their investigations are continuing. The Manhattan DA comes through with the money quote:

Banks that violate international sanctions aren’t just breaking the law, they are enabling the financing of terrorist regimes and undermining our collective safety and security.

The Justice Department and the DA likely are looking at possible criminal charges, something the bank dearly would like to avoid. There is nothing worse for business than having several executives sent up the river for money laundering with a government-identified terrorist regime.

Paying hefty fines and admitting some guilt is a far better option. It’s clean, decisive and ephemeral. A long investigation and a public trial that drags on for months is far more costly.

The WSJ cites a London banking analyst:

Putting this issue behind them will be welcomed by shareholders. Regulators, however aggressive, hold the whip hand now and removing tail risk for this [$340 million] figure — which is below market expectations — is a clear positive for the bank.

It’s like the words in the Rolling Stones song:

When the shit hits the fan
I’m sittin’ on a can
When the whip comes down

Paul Ausick

Photo of Paul Ausick
About the Author Paul Ausick →

Paul Ausick has been writing for a673b.bigscoots-temp.com for more than a decade. He has written extensively on investing in the energy, defense, and technology sectors. In a previous life, he wrote technical documentation and managed a marketing communications group in Silicon Valley.

He has a bachelor's degree in English from the University of Chicago and now lives in Montana, where he fishes for trout in the summer and stays inside during the winter.

Featured Reads

Our top personal finance-related articles today. Your wallet will thank you later.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618