GM Names Surprise Choice as New CEO: First Female at a Major Automaker

Photo of Paul Ausick
By Paul Ausick Updated Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

GMBRANDMARK-blueflat
courtesy of General Motors
As of Monday night, U.S. taxpayers are no longer shareholders in General Motors Corp. (NYSE: GM). So the company’s decision to announce Tuesday morning that Mary Barra will become the new chief executive, replacing Dan Akerson, appears to be deliberate, not coincidental. There had been speculation that Akerson might leave before his contract expired in 2015, but this announcement was earlier than anyone expected.

Akerson was named CEO in 2009 and steered the company through its bankruptcy, reorganization, federal bailout and, eventually, repayment of the government funding that GM received. It could truly be said that his work at GM was finished.

Mark Reuss, who is president of GM’s North American division (the company’s largest) was widely viewed as the most likely candidate to replace Akerson. He has headed the North American group for four years and often filled in for Akerson at public appearances. Other top GM executives who were contenders include CFO Daniel Ammann and vice-chairman Stephen Girsky.

Barra has been head of GM product development for nearly three years and has held a variety of senior executive posts in her 30+ year career at the company. She was charged with slashing the company’s costs and rationalizing the 30 different designs the company uses to a more manageable number.

It seems reasonable to believe that she played a significant part in reaching the recent decision to quit selling the Chevrolet brand in Europe in favor of the company’s lackluster Opel and Vauxhall brands.

When GM made the announcement regarding Chevy, the company’s vice-chairman said that Opel is “gaining momentum” whereas Chevy’s sales were going nowhere. GM estimates that the turnaround in Opel and Vauxhall sales will return to profitability by mid-decade. The decision could cost GM up to $1 billion in restructuring charges.

Opel has cost the company around $16 billion in losses over the past dozen years, and why GM has stuck with the brand for all this time is really down to two points: nobody else will buy it and closing it down would have been impossible given European restrictions on firing all those workers.

Barra begins her tenure as CEO with the Opel millstone around her neck. If it ends up eventually dragging her down, she will not be able to point the finger at someone else’s decision.

GM shares were trading about flat Tuesday morning, but that is most likely due to the end of the government’s shareholding more than to the naming of Barra. The stock was up 0.1%, at $40.91 in a 52-week range of $24.40 to $41.17.

Photo of Paul Ausick
About the Author Paul Ausick →

Paul Ausick has been writing for a673b.bigscoots-temp.com for more than a decade. He has written extensively on investing in the energy, defense, and technology sectors. In a previous life, he wrote technical documentation and managed a marketing communications group in Silicon Valley.

He has a bachelor's degree in English from the University of Chicago and now lives in Montana, where he fishes for trout in the summer and stays inside during the winter.

Featured Reads

Our top personal finance-related articles today. Your wallet will thank you later.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618