Auto Emissions: Good News and Bad in 2014

Photo of Paul Ausick
By Paul Ausick Updated Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
Auto Emissions: Good News and Bad in 2014

© Thinkstock

Last week the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released its report on fuel economy and greenhouse gas emissions for model year 2014 light-duty vehicles (cars, minivans and pickups mostly). As a group, carmakers topped the stricter 2014 emissions standards and maintained fuel economy at the highest level the EPA has ever recorded.

First the good news. Overall, the auto industry’s compliance with greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions standards was better than it needed to be by 13 grams of GHG emissions per mile driven. The standard for model year 2014 was 287 grams per mile and carmakers achieved 274 grams per mile, a nominal year-over-year decline of 5 grams per mile.

Only two carmakers, Mercedes and Kia, exceeded their fleet compliance values. Volkswagen cars are not included due to the current investigation into the company’s fiddling with its diesel cars’ software.

The less good news is that the low-hanging fruit may have now been picked. The American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE) created this chart to indicate where the industry has been and where it is headed regarding GHG emissions:

GHG chart - 12-22-15 ACEEE
American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy

[ims_survey]
Here’s ACEEE’s explanation of the chart, which is based on data from the EPA report:

Required values (orange) for 2013-14 are less demanding than projected (gray), largely because the standards adjust to the size and type of vehicle sold. And the discrepancy between projected and actual requirements is increasing as sales of bigger vehicles grows. Average emissions (blue) remain lower than the rule’s projected requirements, but that advantage nearly vanished in model year 2014, and the trend is not encouraging.

In other words, all those pickup trucks and sport utility vehicles that U.S. consumers have been buying have narrowed the gap between what the EPA expects and what carmakers can deliver, and as long as gasoline prices are around $2 a gallon, there is no incentive for consumers to buy more fuel-efficient vehicles. That means that meeting projected 2015 and 2016 targets is highly doubtful.

Photo of Paul Ausick
About the Author Paul Ausick →

Paul Ausick has been writing for a673b.bigscoots-temp.com for more than a decade. He has written extensively on investing in the energy, defense, and technology sectors. In a previous life, he wrote technical documentation and managed a marketing communications group in Silicon Valley.

He has a bachelor's degree in English from the University of Chicago and now lives in Montana, where he fishes for trout in the summer and stays inside during the winter.

Featured Reads

Our top personal finance-related articles today. Your wallet will thank you later.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618