Apple Ordered to Cease iPhone Sales in Germany

Photo of Paul Ausick
By Paul Ausick Updated Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
Apple Ordered to Cease iPhone Sales in Germany

© Jack Taylor / Getty Images

A district court judge in Munich, Germany, this morning ordered Apple Inc. (NASDAQ: AAPL) to stop selling iPhones in Germany that infringe on patents claimed by Qualcomm Inc. (NASDAQ: QCOM). According to Qualcomm press release, the injunction applies to all iPhone models.

The injunction becomes effective as soon as Qualcomm posts required bonds, which the company said would be done within a few days. The bonds cover potential damages the injunction causes Apple if the court’s ruling is overturned or amended on appeal.

Apple already has said that it would appeal the German court’s ruling, but it has also withdrawn iPhone 7 and iPhone 8 models from its own retail stores in Germany. The phones are still sold at some 4,300 carrier and reseller stores in the country. The iPhone XS, XS Max and XR models still will be available at all stores, including Apple’s own.

At issue is battery efficiency technology that Qualcomm holds a patent on and that is being used in the modem chips from Intel that Apple uses in the latest iPhones. Rather than license the technology, Qualcomm tried to get Apple to use Qualcomm chips exclusively, according to report at AppleInsider.

[nativounit]

Qualcomm’s general counsel said:

Two respected courts in two different jurisdictions just in the past two weeks have now confirmed the value of Qualcomm’s patents and declared Apple an infringer, ordering a ban on iPhones in the important markets of Germany and China.

Apple responded:

Qualcomm’s campaign is a desperate attempt to distract from the real issues between our companies. Their tactics, in the courts and in their everyday business, are harming innovation and harming consumers. Qualcomm insists on charging exorbitant fees based on work they didn’t do and they are being investigated by governments all around the world for their behavior. We are of course disappointed by this verdict and we plan to appeal.

Intel’s general counsel also commented:

Competition authorities around the world have repeatedly found Qualcomm’s licensing practices unlawful, yet Qualcomm continues to try to achieve the same results through a campaign of patent lawsuits. These lawsuits have been largely unsuccessful, and at best would reduce innovation and raise prices.

Since the dispute between Apple and Qualcomm first arose, Apple’s manufacturers have withheld around $7 billion in royalty payments to Qualcomm at Apple’s direction. A U.S. district court judge ruled in November that Qualcomm must license its technology to competitors like Intel.

The dispute officially turns two years old next month and a final settlement is not in sight.

[recirclink id=513672]

[wallst_email_signup]

Photo of Paul Ausick
About the Author Paul Ausick →

Paul Ausick has been writing for a673b.bigscoots-temp.com for more than a decade. He has written extensively on investing in the energy, defense, and technology sectors. In a previous life, he wrote technical documentation and managed a marketing communications group in Silicon Valley.

He has a bachelor's degree in English from the University of Chicago and now lives in Montana, where he fishes for trout in the summer and stays inside during the winter.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618