Exxon Mobil Is Dow’s Biggest Loser in 2017

By Paul Ausick Updated Jan 12, 2:42PM EST · Published Feb 18, 9:15AM EST

Follow 24/7 Wall St. on Google

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

Exxon Mobil Is Dow’s Biggest Loser in 2017 — © Wikimedia Commons

[cnxvideo id=”655424″ placement=”ros”]2017 has been a tough year for Exxon Mobil Corp. (NYSE: XOM). The stock has dropped 9.4% since the beginning of the year, and the energy giant is one of just seven Dow stocks that are trading down for the year to date.

The price of benchmark West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil has dropped just 0.6% since the beginning of the year, from $53.75 a barrel to $53.40, through Friday.

As the company already has said, Exxon is going to have to write down the carrying value of its assets — the only question is by how much. Last week Exxon indicated that up to 3.6 billion barrels of its Canadian oil sands reserves are no longer profitable to pump out.

The definition of a proved barrel is one that can be extracted with current technology and produce a profit at current prices. Oil companies’ proved reserves are their main assets and the single most important item that determines their borrowing rate.

[nativounit]

A barrel that has to stay in the ground would ideally increase in value over time as prices rise and costs come down. What is worrying to producers is that advances in renewable technology will proceed more quickly, and the long-term value of barrels left in the ground now won’t ever rise. The commonly used term for this new phenomenon is “peak demand,” the obverse of what was called “peak oil” a decade ago.

Costs to produce a barrel of oil from Canada’s oil sands are among the highest in the world, and crude prices of $50 to $55 a barrel are barely profitable. Only about 20% of the total oil sands resource is profitable at today’s crude prices, but leaving the stuff in the ground means that the billions Exxon and other oil giants invested in the oil sands is dead money.

Exxon’s $6.6 billion purchase of acreage in the Permian Basin can help, but higher prices for crude are key, and the production cuts recently instituted by OPEC have moved the price of crude into a range of $50 to $55 a barrel, where it now seems stuck. Even if production from the Permian doesn’t begin this year, the acquisition adds more than 6 billion barrels of oil equivalent to Exxon’s assets, and that will make a difference to the company’s valuation and how much it has to pay for borrowing.

Exxon’s shares closed at $81.76 on Friday, down about 0.7% for the day in a 52-week range of $79.67 to $95.55. The consensus 12-month price target is $88.57, in a range of $72 to $105 per share.

[wallst_email_signup]

About the Author Paul Ausick →

Paul Ausick has been writing for a673b.bigscoots-temp.com for more than a decade. He has written extensively on investing in the energy, defense, and technology sectors. In a previous life, he wrote technical documentation and managed a marketing communications group in Silicon Valley.

He has a bachelor's degree in English from the University of Chicago and now lives in Montana, where he fishes for trout in the summer and stays inside during the winter.