An advisor submits: Regarding Jeremy Grantham’s apocalytic view, here’s how I explain the current environment to clients. Back in 2000, the investment landscape looked like the Alps, with stunning peaks (technology and some other large-cap growth) and deep valleys (REITs, small-cap value, energy, emerging markets). Today, the investment landscape looks like the Tibetan Plateau, with high valuations in every direction, as far as the eye can see.
I then asked him how he justified his substantial overweight in energy stocks. He has something like 22% of his portfolios in energy, vs. 7% for EAFE, and he acknowledged he would overweight even more except that the funds have a policy limiting sector overweights. Hasn’t energy had the same kind of run-up, I asked, as small-caps and emerging markets?
"Can you think of any other industry," he replied, "where prices have tripled?" He said he assumes $50 oil, which he thinks is conservative, and even with that many energy stocks still appear to be much better values than anything else around.
I also asked him about his substantial underweight in Japan. The explanation: He looks for high return on capital combined with low valuation — shades of Joel Greenblatt — and return on capital is pathetically low in Japan.