SEC Settles Charges With Firm Regarding Custody Rule Violations

Photo of Chris Lange
By Chris Lange Updated Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
SEC Settles Charges With Firm Regarding Custody Rule Violations

© Thinkstock

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced that an investment advisory firm, two owners, and a former chief compliance officer have agreed to settle charges. This is in regards to the allegations that the firm has again violated the custody rule after being reprimanded for violations only a few years before.

Sands Brothers Asset Management and co-founders Martin Sands and Steven Sands agreed to pay a $1 million penalty and will be suspended for a year from raising money from new or existing investors.

At the same time, they also must have a compliance monitor for three years. The former chief compliance officer (CCO) Christopher Kelly, who also served as chief operating officer (COO), agreed to pay a $60,000 penalty and will be suspended for one year from acting as a CCO or appearing or practicing before the SEC as an attorney.

Without admitting or denying the charges, Sands Brothers, Martin Sands and Steven Sands consented to the SEC’s order finding that the firm violated the custody rule and the brothers caused and willfully aided and abetted the violations. Kelly also neither admitted nor denied the charges while consenting to an SEC order finding that he caused and willfully aided and abetted the firm’s custody violations.

For some background on the rule: the custody rule requires firms to obtain independent verification of assets when they can access or control client money or securities so investors know they are protected from misuse or theft. In this case, Sands Brothers and its co-founders first landed in the SEC’s cross-hairs in 2010 when they were subjects of an enforcement action for custody rule violations and agreed to settle the charges by paying a $60,000 penalty. They faced new charges in an administrative proceeding instituted in October 2014 when the SEC Enforcement Division alleged the firm was repeatedly late in providing investors with audited financial statements of its private funds.

Andrew M. Calamari, director of the SEC’s New York Regional Office, said:

There is no place for recidivism in the securities markets. The Sands brothers missed their opportunity to right a previous wrong and instead merely repeated their custody rule violations, so now they face more severe consequences.

ALSO READ: 3 Defense Stocks to Buy Likely to See Increased Spending After Paris Attacks

Photo of Chris Lange
About the Author Chris Lange →

Chris Lange is a writer for 24/7 Wall St., based in Houston. He has covered financial markets over the past decade with an emphasis on healthcare, tech, and IPOs. During this time, he has published thousands of articles with insightful analysis across these complex fields. Currently, Lange's focus is on military and geopolitical topics.

Lange's work has been quoted or mentioned in Forbes, The New York Times, Business Insider, USA Today, MSN, Yahoo, The Verge, Vice, The Intelligencer, Quartz, Nasdaq, The Motley Fool, Fox Business, International Business Times, The Street, Seeking Alpha, Barron’s, Benzinga, and many other major publications.

A graduate of Southwestern University in Georgetown, Texas, Lange majored in business with a particular focus on investments. He has previous experience in the banking industry and startups.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618