SEC Issues Fraud Charges Over Native American Bonds

By Chris Lange Updated Jan 13, 4:01PM EST · Published Dec 16, 12:10PM EST

Follow 24/7 Wall St. on Google

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

SEC Issues Fraud Charges Over Native American Bonds — © Wikimedia Commons

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced fraud charges against a Stamford, Conn.-based investment advisory firm. Atlantic Asset Management (AAM) stands accused of investing clients in certain bonds with a hidden financial benefit to a broker-dealer connected to the firm.

In the complaint, the SEC alleges that the firm invested over $43 million of client funds in illiquid bonds issued by a Native American tribal corporation without disclosing the conflict of interest that the bond sales generated a private placement fee for the broker-dealer, the parent company of which partially owns AAM.

According to the SEC’s complaint filed in federal court in Manhattan:

AAM is partially owned by an entity called BFG Socially Responsible Investing Ltd., although BFG’s ownership is not disclosed in AAM’s public SEC filings.

At the suggestion of a BFG representative, AAM purchased the dubious, illiquid bonds on behalf of clients while aware that the sales would generate a private placement fee for a broker-dealer affiliated with BFG. AAM also was aware that proceeds from the bond sales were to be used to purchase an annuity provided by BFG’s parent company.

An AAM officer evaluating whether or not to make the investments discussed balancing the “fiduciary duty” owed to the placement agent with the duty owed to AAM’s clients.

AAM ultimately decided to put its owner’s financial interests first, approving the bond purchases without telling clients about the conflict of interest.

Upon learning about the investments in the bonds, several AAM clients expressed concern over the bonds’ valuation and suitability. They demanded, unsuccessfully, that the investments be unwound.

[nativounit]
Andrew M. Calamari, director of the SEC’s New York Regional Office, said:

As alleged, Atlantic violated a fundamental duty to its clients by placing its own financial interests ahead of client interests,” AAM’s clients should have been informed that the investments in illiquid bonds would financially benefit people with ownership control over AAM.

About the Author Chris Lange →

Chris Lange is a writer for 24/7 Wall St., based in Houston. He has covered financial markets over the past decade with an emphasis on healthcare, tech, and IPOs. During this time, he has published thousands of articles with insightful analysis across these complex fields. Currently, Lange's focus is on military and geopolitical topics.

Lange's work has been quoted or mentioned in Forbes, The New York Times, Business Insider, USA Today, MSN, Yahoo, The Verge, Vice, The Intelligencer, Quartz, Nasdaq, The Motley Fool, Fox Business, International Business Times, The Street, Seeking Alpha, Barron’s, Benzinga, and many other major publications.

A graduate of Southwestern University in Georgetown, Texas, Lange majored in business with a particular focus on investments. He has previous experience in the banking industry and startups.