Will Investors Accept a New Trade War ETF?

Photo of Jon C. Ogg
By Jon C. Ogg Updated Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
Will Investors Accept a New Trade War ETF?

© PeopleImages / Getty Images

It is said frequently in the investment community that there is an exchange-traded fund (ETF) for almost any imaginable type of strategy. Now there is a so-called trade war ETF for investors to consider.

The Innovation Trade War ETF (NYSEARCA: TWAR) launched without much publicity on June 5, 2019. While the trade war angle persists in the news today, this ETF has been targeted for a while now by a group called MCAM International.

This ETF targets companies that are seen as innovation-rich with state-sponsored patronage and that may benefit from trade wars, based on their governmental sponsorship or partnerships. The ETF sports a 0.81% management fee and, according to its factsheet, seeks to track the total return performance of the Martin Global Innovation Equity (MGIE) Trade War Index.

The same algorithm behind the CNBC IQ 100 also powers this index. M-CAM International developed the index in 2016, and it is said to include 120 companies with large-cap and mid-cap valuations.

[nativounit]

As of May 31, 2019, these were the top 10 holdings and their respective weightings:

  • General Electric (2.15%)
  • Cisco Systems (1.54%)
  • International Business Machines (1.38%)
  • Edwards Lifesciences (1.31%)
  • Xerox (1.27%)
  • Advanced Micro Devices (1.13%)
  • Micron Technology (1.13%)
  • Dover (1.00%)
  • Mastercard (0.99%)
  • Amazon.com (0.99%)

For those who have tracked ETF launches for years, this is one may stand out as too specialized, or the holdings might be a topic for debate among investors. Then again, the expanding trade wars of 2018 and 2019 have taken new interest that was never really there in prior years.

As per industry practice, this ETF will pay its transaction costs (commissions and exchange fees). The end result is that a higher portfolio turnover rate should drive up transaction costs and are not reflected in the fund’s annual operating expenses.

[recirclink id=551695]
[wallst_email_signup]

Photo of Jon C. Ogg
About the Author Jon C. Ogg →

Jon Ogg has been a financial news analyst since 1997. Mr. Ogg set up one of the first audio squawk box services for traders called TTN, which he sold in 2003. He has previously worked as a licensed broker to some of the top U.S. and E.U. financial institutions, managed capital, and has raised private capital at the seed and venture stage. He has lived in Copenhagen, Denmark, as well as New York and Chicago, and he now lives in Houston, Texas. Jon received a Bachelor of Business Administration in finance at University of Houston in 1992. a673b.bigscoots-temp.com.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618