Gig Economy Fails to Equalize Gender Pay Gap

Photo of Paul Ausick
By Paul Ausick Updated Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
Gig Economy Fails to Equalize Gender Pay Gap

© Spencer Platt / Getty Images

The gig economy was supposed to deliver a variety of benefits. Workers could work when and as much as they wanted while maintaining a work-life balance that made them happy. Would that it were so.

Economist Laurence Michel published a study in May that looked at the ride-sharing service Uber and concluded that the company’s drivers were earning less than $12 an hour after commissions, booking fees and expenses.

A new study by economists at Stanford and the University of Chicago shows that the gig economy has even failed to eliminate the pay gap between men and women, based on a study of Uber workers. Women who drive for Uber earn 7% less per hour than men.

The study’s authors show that the gap “can be entirely attributed to three factors”:

Experience on the platform (learning-by-doing)

Preferences over where to work (driven largely by where workers live and, to a lesser extent, safety)

Preferences for driving speed.

[nativounit]

Almost half the difference in pay was due to the fact that men simply drive faster than women. Men are also more likely to have been on the job longer and are more willing to drive in areas with high crime rates than are women. The researchers’ conclusion:

[T]here is no reason to expect the “gig” economy to close gender differences. Even in the absence of discrimination and in flexible labor markets, women’s relatively high opportunity cost of non-paid-work time and gender-based differences in preferences and constraints can sustain a gender pay gap.

The study’s findings line up with earlier studies of gender pay inequality that show self-employed women make about 15% less than men and women who are independent contractors earn 21.5% less than men. The gig economy may be better, but it’s not yet equal.

[recirclink id=474713]

[wallst_email_signup]

Photo of Paul Ausick
About the Author Paul Ausick →

Paul Ausick has been writing for a673b.bigscoots-temp.com for more than a decade. He has written extensively on investing in the energy, defense, and technology sectors. In a previous life, he wrote technical documentation and managed a marketing communications group in Silicon Valley.

He has a bachelor's degree in English from the University of Chicago and now lives in Montana, where he fishes for trout in the summer and stays inside during the winter.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618