Pay TV Bundling Challenged

Photo of Paul Ausick
By Paul Ausick Updated Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

TV sports
Thinkstock
In a lawsuit filed late yesterday in New York, Cablevision Systems Corp. (NYSE: CVC) is taking on Viacom Inc. (NASDAQ: VIAB) in a move that challenges the media company’s practice of forcing cable providers to pay for dozens of channels that nobody wants as part of the basic cable offering. Ironically, when a consumer group filed a similar suit just a year ago, Cablevision sided with media companies and successfully beat back an effort to force the media companies to offer what’s known as a la carte programming.

Cablevision made this comment about yesterday’s filing:

The manner in which Viacom sells its programming is illegal, anti-consumer, and wrong. Viacom effectively forces Cablevision’s customers to pay for and receive little-watched channels in order to get the channels they actually want. Viacom’s abuse of its market power is not only illegal, but also prevents Cablevision from delivering the programming that its customers want and that competes with Viacom’s less popular channels.

Viacom may only be a stalking horse for the rest of the media industry that includes big names the Walt Disney Co. (NYSE: DIS) and its Disney channels, ESPN channels, and ABC broadcast network; News Corp. (NASDAQ: NWSA), which owns the Fox broadcast network and other Fox channels; Time Warner Inc. (NYSE: TWX), which owns HBO, the Turner channels, and CNN; CBS Corp. (NYSE: CBS) which owns Showtime as well as its eponymous broadcast network; and Comcast Corp. (NASDAQ: CMCSA) which now controls NBC.

The signal issue here is what’s called ‘tying’, a practice where programmers include that what Cablevision calls “less popular ancillary channels’ along with “must-have networks.” Cablevision cites Viacom’s must-have networks as Nickelodeon, Comedy Central, and MTV, along with 14 of the ancillary channels that are forced on the cable operators.

Combined with other lawsuits and complaints about programmers’ bundling requirements, the current spate of actions against the programmers could result in some relief for consumers, who are currently paying an average of $90 a month for cable or satellite channels that many don’t want and don’t watch.

Photo of Paul Ausick
About the Author Paul Ausick →

Paul Ausick has been writing for a673b.bigscoots-temp.com for more than a decade. He has written extensively on investing in the energy, defense, and technology sectors. In a previous life, he wrote technical documentation and managed a marketing communications group in Silicon Valley.

He has a bachelor's degree in English from the University of Chicago and now lives in Montana, where he fishes for trout in the summer and stays inside during the winter.

Featured Reads

Our top personal finance-related articles today. Your wallet will thank you later.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618