Is the Playboy Brand About to Disappear?

Photo of Jon C. Ogg
By Jon C. Ogg Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

Playboy Enterprises may be synonymous with Hugh Hefner, but the company’s brand is becoming more and more at risk of becoming synonymous with “vanishing” and other terms of disappearance. A new research report downgrades the corporate credit ratings of the Playboy companies. While there is no formal prediction for bankruptcy or liquidation, the verbiage is rather alarming, and we cannot help but wonder if Playboy is on the verge of joining our list of brands that could disappear. Standard & Poor’s downgraded the corporate credit ratings of Playboy Enterprises Inc. to CCC+ based on weak operating performance, and its outlook of “Developing” indicates more downgrade risk ahead.

S&P signaled that Playboy has performed under its expectations, and it believes that the company is now at risk of violating its leverage and interest coverage covenants in the third or fourth quarter of 2013. S&P warns that this risk could potentially jeopardize its access to its revolving credit facility.

S&P’s downgrade said”

We are lowering the corporate credit rating to ‘CCC+’ from ‘B-‘. We are also lowering the issue–level ratings on the company’s senior secured debt to ‘B-‘ from ‘B’. The developing outlook reflects the potential for a further downgrade in the next 12 months if the company faces further delays in securing new licensing contracts, which would increase the company’s risk of violating the total leverage and interest coverage covenants.

S&P did at least say that it could upgrade Playboy’s corporate credit rating if it improves operating performance or receives an amendment that raises its covenant headroom above 10%. How likely this is we cannot really comment on. S&P also said, “The ‘2’ recovery rating indicates our expectation of substantial (70% to 90%) recovery for lenders in the event of a payment default.”

The S&P downgrade on Playboy does not formally warn of bankruptcy. The problem is that it goes all the way around the warning that it is implied. Here are some of the phrases used in the downgrade that bring so much concern:

  • risk of violating covenants
  • based on the uncertain timing of new deals in Playboy’s licensing pipeline
  • risks surrounding the long-term success of this business model
  • weak performance … linked to a series of deals that did not close in the first half of 2013
  • has a “highly leveraged” financial risk profile
  • weak credit measures and aggressive financial policy
  • business risk profile “vulnerable”
  • recent operating shortfalls
  • exposure to declining business segments that will continue to restrain growth
  • uncertainty regarding the long-term success of its transition to a content licensing model
  • inability to date to meet operating goals
  • view the company’s management and governance as “weak”
  • ownership by a private-equity sponsor that has capitalized the company heavily with debt during a major business transition
  • near breach of its minimum EBITDA covenant twice over the past 18 months
  • recorded significant restructuring charges as it transitioned to a brand management company

Playboy is certainly one of the iconic American brands. It is also a brand that becomes less and less prominent as it fights negative print media trends and has to fight for eyeballs in a world full of free online adult entertainment.

Failure to secure these deals in the third or fourth quarter will pressure the company’s covenant headroom. However, the addition of these high-margin licensing deals would improve operating performance and likely prevent a covenant violation. Playboy’s television and digital assets segment had been hampered by the availability of free adult content on the Internet.

Photo of Jon C. Ogg
About the Author Jon C. Ogg →

Jon Ogg has been a financial news analyst since 1997. Mr. Ogg set up one of the first audio squawk box services for traders called TTN, which he sold in 2003. He has previously worked as a licensed broker to some of the top U.S. and E.U. financial institutions, managed capital, and has raised private capital at the seed and venture stage. He has lived in Copenhagen, Denmark, as well as New York and Chicago, and he now lives in Houston, Texas. Jon received a Bachelor of Business Administration in finance at University of Houston in 1992. a673b.bigscoots-temp.com.

Featured Reads

Our top personal finance-related articles today. Your wallet will thank you later.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618