Americans Watch Only 17 TV Channels

Photo of Paul Ausick
By Paul Ausick Updated Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

136843547
Thinkstock
The remote control in the hand of an average American now has a selection of 189 TV channels available for viewing. That is an increase of almost 50% in the past six years.

So what do we do with all these new choices? We mostly ignore 172 channels and watch the same 17 channels we’ve been watching for the past six years. Apparently Americans don’t have much imagination.

The data come from a recent study by media research firm Nielsen, and their conclusion is not that Americans lack imagination. Nielsen says that Americans recognize (new) junk when they see it and are satisfied with the channels (junk?) they have watched for years:

This data is significant in that it substantiates the notion that more content does not necessarily equate to more channel consumption. And that means quality is imperative — for both content creators and advertisers. So the best way to reach consumers in a world with myriad options is to be the best option.

You don’t often hear the words “quality” and “pay TV” in the same breath. Far more common is the reaction of survey respondents who rate pay-TV services only ahead of Internet services as the worst industry in the United States when rated on customer satisfaction.

Consolidation in the pay-TV industry, with Comcast Corp. (NASDAQ: CMCSA) offering to swallow Time Warner Cable Inc. (NYSE: TWC) and AT&T Inc. (NYSE: T) wanting to gobble up DirecTV (NASDAQ: DTV), is not likely to improve either the quality of pay-TV offerings nor the price that consumers pay. Pressure will intensify from consumers and lawmakers to allow pay-TV customers to subscribe to just the 17 channels they want to watch and not the 172 and more they do not care about.

That is what is known as a la carte pricing, and it is not good for the cable companies that know they will have to charge higher prices for the a la carte subscriptions, threatening their subscriber numbers, their revenues and their profits. Some consumer groups are demanding a la carte pricing, figuring that the new pricing scheme will lower consumers’ monthly bills. That could happen, but it is not guaranteed. Picking the 17 channels that the average American watches could very likely turn out to be much more expensive than paying the tab for all 189.

ALSO READ: The Nine Most Misleading Product Claims

Photo of Paul Ausick
About the Author Paul Ausick →

Paul Ausick has been writing for a673b.bigscoots-temp.com for more than a decade. He has written extensively on investing in the energy, defense, and technology sectors. In a previous life, he wrote technical documentation and managed a marketing communications group in Silicon Valley.

He has a bachelor's degree in English from the University of Chicago and now lives in Montana, where he fishes for trout in the summer and stays inside during the winter.

Featured Reads

Our top personal finance-related articles today. Your wallet will thank you later.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618